Résumés
Abstract
This article reviews Marcin Lewinski and Mark Aakhus’s Argumentation in Complex Communication (Oxford 2022).
Keywords:
- argumentation theory,
- contrastivism,
- polylogues
Résumé
Cet article passe en revue l’ouvrage de Marcin Lewinski et Mark Aakhus, Argumentation in Complex Communication (Oxford 2022).
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Aikin, Scott F. 2006. “Contrastive Self‐Attribution of Belief.” Social Epistemology 20 (1): 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720500512275.
- Aikin, Scott F. 2021a. “Argumentative Adversariality, Contrastive Reasons, and the Winners-and-Losers Problem.” Topoi 40 (5): 837–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-020-09719-w.
- Aikin, Scott F. 2021b. “Dialectical Responsibility and Regress Skepticism.” In Epistemic Duties: New Arguments, New Angles, 268–80. New York; London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Groupe.
- Aikin, Scott F., and Robert Talisse. 2019. Why We Argue (and How We Should): Guide to Disagreement in an Age of Unreason. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
- Baumann, Peter. 2008. “Problems for Sinnott-Armstrong’s Moral Contrastivism.” The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-) 58 (232): 463–70.
- Becker, Kelly. 2009. “Contrastivism and Lucky Questions.” Philosophia, January, 37 (2):245-260
- Sinnott‐Armstrong, Walter. 2008. “A Contrastivist Manifesto.” Social Epistemology 22 (3): 257–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720802546120.
- Snedegar, Justin. 2015. “Contrastivism About Reasons and Ought: Contrastivism About Reasons and Ought.” Philosophy Compass 10 (6): 379–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12231.