Résoudre les tensions de la durabilité en petite entreprise : quand la gestion paradoxale devient difficilement soutenable

Sommer, Maël

doi:https://doi.org/10.7202/1088331ar

Allen, S., Marshall, J. et Easterby-Smith, M. (2015). Living with contradictions : the dynamics of senior managers’ identity tensions in relation to sustainability. Organization & Environment, 28(3), 328-348.

Google Scholar

Angus‐Leppan, T., Benn, S. et Young, L. (2010). A sensemaking approach to trade‐offs and synergies between human and ecological elements of corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 230-244.

Google Scholar

Ashforth, B.E., Rogers, K.M., Pratt, M.G. et Pradies, C. (2014). Ambivalence in organizations : a multilevel approach. Organization Science, 25(5), 1453-1478.

Google Scholar

Auberger, M.N. et Quairel, F. (2004). Des PME socialement responsables ? Économie & Humanisme, 370, 16-19.

Google Scholar

Banerjee, S.B. (2003). Who sustains whose development ? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24(1), 143-180.

Google Scholar

Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably : a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197-218.

Google Scholar

Bansal, P. et Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green : a model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736.

Google Scholar

Bardin, L. (2013). L’Analyse de contenu. Paris, Presses universitaires de France.

Google Scholar

Bérard, C., Bruyère, C. et Saleilles, S. (2015). Les PME axées sur la durabilité et à forte croissance : une approche par les paradoxes. Revue internationale PME, 28(3-4), 195-223.

Google Scholar

Berger-Douce, S. (2005). Management environnemental et PME : apports et limites d’une démarche collective. Revue internationale PME, 18(3-4), 93-123.

Google Scholar

Berger-Douce, S. (2019). Transition numérique et engagement RSE en PME : une lecture par la gestion des paradoxes ? @GRH, (4), 91-118.

Google Scholar

Biondi, V., Frey, M. et Iraldo, F. (2000). Environmental management systems and SMEs. Greener Management International, 29(29), 55-69.

Google Scholar

Bon, V., Lacroux, A., Teller, P. et Van Der Yeught, C. (2013). Les pratiques de développement durable et de RSE en région PACA : la spécificité des petites entreprises en question. Recherches en Sciences de Gestion, (3), 179-197.

Google Scholar

Brundtland, G. (1987). Our common future : report of the world commission on environment and development. Récupéré le 29 novembre 2019 sur le site : http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm.

Google Scholar

Caillaud, S. et Flick, U. (2016). Triangulation méthodologique ou comment penser son plan de recherche. Bruxelles, De Boeck.

Google Scholar

Callot, P. (2014). La difficile appropriation du concept de RSE par les TPE. Le cas de la viticulture. La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 5(269-270), 129-137.

Google Scholar

Cameron, K. et Quinn, R. (1988). Organizational paradox and transformation. Dans R. Quinn et K. Cameron (dir.), Paradox and transformation : toward a theory of change in organization and management (p. 1-18). Cambridge, États-Unis, Ballinger.

Google Scholar

Chauvey, J.N. et Naro, G. (2013). Reporting et pilotage societaux : repenser la performance globale à l’aune des paradoxes de la RSE. Dans Comptabilité sans frontières... The French Connection (p. 1-25).Montréal, Canada.

Google Scholar

Christmann, P. et Taylor, G. (2012). International business and the natural environment. Dans P. Bansal et A.J. Hoffman (dir.), Business and the natural environment (p. 50-69). Oxford, Royaume-Uni, Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar

Clegg, S.R. et Cunha, M.P. (2017). Organizational dialectics. Dans W.K. Smith, M.W. Lewis, P. Jarzabkowski et A. Langley (dir.), The handbook of organizational paradox (p. 105-124). Oxford, Royaume-Uni, Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar

Clegg, S.R., Cunha, J.V. et Cunha, M.P. (2002). Management paradoxes : a relational view. Human Relations, 55(5), 483-503.

Google Scholar

Cohen, M.D. et March, J.G. (1974). Leadership and ambiguity : the American college president. New York, McGraw Hill.

Google Scholar

Courrent, J.M. (2012). RSE et développement durable en PME : comprendre pour agir. Bruxelles, De Boeck.

Google Scholar

Courrent, J.M., Spence, M. et Gherib, J. (2016). Profil du dirigeant et adhésion à l’argument économique de la responsabilité sociale en petite entreprise. Revue internationale PME, 29(2), 31-64.

Google Scholar

Cunha, M.P. et Putnam, L.L. (2017). Paradox theory and the paradox of success. Strategic Organization, 17(1), 95-106.

Google Scholar

Denison, D.R., Hooijberg, R. et Quinn, R.E. (1995). Paradox and performance : toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524-540.

Google Scholar

Dujarier, M.A. (2006). L’idéal au travail. Paris, Presses universitaires de France.

Google Scholar

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks : the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Île Gabriola, Canada, New Society.

Google Scholar

Epstein, M.J., Buhovac, A.R. et Yuthas, K. (2015). Managing social, environmental and financial performance simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 48(1), 35-45.

Google Scholar

Fiol, C.M., Pratt, M.G. et O’Connor, E.J. (2009). Managing intractable identity conflicts. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 32-55.

Google Scholar

Ford, J.D. et Ford, L.W. (1994). Logics of identity, contradiction and attraction in change. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 756-785.

Google Scholar

Gao, J. et Bansal, P. (2013). Instrumental and integrative logics in business sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 241-255.

Google Scholar

Gebert, D., Boerner, S. et Kearney, E. (2010). Fostering team innovation : why is it important to combine opposing action strategies ? Organization Science, 21(3), 593-608.

Google Scholar

Grimand, A., Derumez, I.V. et Schäfer, P. (2014). Manager les paradoxes de la RSE. Revue française de gestion, (3), 133-148.

Google Scholar

Hahn, T. et Figge, F. (2011). Beyond the bounded instrumentality in current corporate sustainability research : toward an inclusive notion of profitability. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 325-345.

Google Scholar

Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J. et Preuss, L. (2010). Trade‐offs in corporate sustainability : you can’t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 217-229.

Google Scholar

Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J. et Preuss, L. (2018). A paradox perspective on corporate sustainability : descriptive, instrumental and normative aspects. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 235-248.

Google Scholar

Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L. et Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability : towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 297-316.

Google Scholar

Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J. et Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability : managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 463-487.

Google Scholar

Henderson, R. et Clark, K. (1990). Architectural innovation : the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9-30.

Google Scholar

Hillary, R. (2004). Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(6), 561-569.

Google Scholar

Hoffman, A.J. et Bazerman, M.H. (2007). Changing practice on sustainability : understanding and overcoming the organizational and psychological barriers to action. Dans S. Sharma, M. Starik et B. Husted (dir.), Organizations and the sustainability mosaic. Crafting long-term ecological and societal solutions (p. 84-105). Cheltenham, Royaume-Uni, Edward Elgar Publishing.

Google Scholar

Iivonen, K. (2018). Defensive responses to strategic sustainability paradoxes : have your coke and drink it too ! Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 309-327.

Google Scholar

Ingram, A.E., Lewis, M.W., Barton, S. et Gartner, W.B. (2016). Paradoxes and innovation in family firms : the role of paradoxical thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(1), 161-176.

Google Scholar

Ivory, S.B. et Brooks, S.B. (2017). Managing corporate sustainability with a paradoxical lens : lessons from strategic agility. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 347-361.

Google Scholar

Jay, J., Soderstrom, S. et Grant, G. (2017). Navigating the paradoxes of sustainability. Dans W.K. Smith, M.W. Lewis, P. Jarzabkowski et A. Langley (dir.), The handbook of organizational paradox (p. 353-372). Oxford, Royaume-Uni, Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar

Jenkins, H. (2004). A critique of conventional CSR theory : an SME perspective. Journal of General Management, 29(4), 37-57.

Google Scholar

Jenkins, H. (2009). A ‘business opportunity’ model of corporate social responsibility for small‐and medium‐sized enterprises. Business Ethics, 18(1), 21-36.

Google Scholar

Joffre, P. et Koenig, G. (1992). Gestion stratégique : l’entreprise, ses partenaires-adversaires et leur univers. Paris, Litec.

Google Scholar

Julien, P.A. (1990). Vers une typologie multicritères des PME. Revue internationale PME, 3(3-4), 411-425.

Google Scholar

Kitzinger, J., Markova, I. et Kalampalikis, N. (2004). Qu’est-ce que les focus groups ? Bulletin de psychologie, 471(3), 237-243.

Google Scholar

Koenig, G. (1996). Management stratégique : paradoxes, interactions et apprentissages. Paris, Éditions Nathan.

Google Scholar

Labelle, F., Spence, M. et Courrent, J.M. (2016). A practice-based typology of sustainable SMEs : development of a sustainability compass. Revue de l’organisation responsable, 11(2), 5-23.

Google Scholar

Lepoutre, J. et Heene, A. (2006). Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility : a critical review. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 257-273.

Google Scholar

Lewis, M.W. (2000). Exploring paradox : toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760-776.

Google Scholar

Lewis, M.W. et Smith, W.K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective : sharpening the focus and widening the scope. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 127-149.

Google Scholar

Lozano, R. (2013). Are companies planning their organisational changes for corporate sustainability ? An analysis of three case studies on resistance to change and their strategies to overcome it. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(5), 275-295.

Google Scholar

Lüscher, L.S. et Lewis, M.W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking : working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221-240.

Google Scholar

March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87.

Google Scholar

Margolis, J.D. et Walsh, J. (2003). Misery loves companies : rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.

Google Scholar

Miles, M.B. et Huberman, A.M. (2003). Analyse des données qualitatives. Bruxelles, De Boeck.

Google Scholar

Miron-Spektor, E., Gino, F. et Argote, L. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks : enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 229-240.

Google Scholar

Miron-Spektor, E., Ingram, A., Keller, J., Smith, W.K. et Lewis, M.W. (2018). Microfoundations of organizational paradox : the problem is how we think about the problem. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 26-45.

Google Scholar

Newton, T.J. (2002). Creating the new ecological order ? Elias and actor-network theory. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 523-540.

Google Scholar

Ondoua Biwolé, V. (2017). Nouvelles voies théoriques et méthodologiques pour une meilleure compréhension de l’engagement des PME à la RSE : état de l’art de 2005 à 2015. Revue internationale PME, 30(2), 115-143.

Google Scholar

O’Reilly, C.A. et Tushman, M.L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability : resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206.

Google Scholar

Paradas, A. (2008). La position des petites entreprises face à la responsabilité sociale. Revue de l’organisation responsable, 3(1), 39-52.

Google Scholar

Paradas, A. (2011). Développement durable en petites entreprises. La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, (1), 129-137.

Google Scholar

Perret, V. (2003). Les paradoxes du changement organisationnel. Dans V. Perret et E. Josserand (dir.), Le Paradoxe : penser et gérer autrement les organisations. Paris, Ellipses.

Google Scholar

Perret, V. et Josserand, E. (2003). Le Paradoxe : penser et gérer autrement les organisations. Paris, Ellipses.

Google Scholar

Pinkse, J. et Kolk, A. (2009). International business and global climate change. New York, Routledge.

Google Scholar

Poole, M.S. et Van de Ven, A.H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562-587.

Google Scholar

Porter, M.E. et Kramer, M.R. (2011). The big idea, creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1-2), 62-77.

Google Scholar

Quairel, F. et Auberger, M.N. (2005). Management responsable et PME : une relecture du concept de « responsabilité sociétale de l’entreprise ». La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 40(211-212), 111.

Google Scholar

Quairel-Lanoizelée, F. (2011). La RSE est-elle soluble dans la concurrence ? Dans F. Chavy, N. Postel et R. Sobel (dir.), La responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise. Nouvelle régulation du capitalisme ? (p. 129-149). Villeneuve-d’Ascq, France, Presses universitaires du Septentrion.

Google Scholar

Quinn, R.E. et Cameron, K.S. (1988). Paradox and transformation : toward a theory of change in organization and management. Cambridge, Ballinger.

Google Scholar

Reynaud, E., Depoers, F., Gauthier, C., Gond, J.P. et Schneider-Maunoury, G. (2011). Le Développement durable au coeur de l’entreprise. Paris, Dunod.

Google Scholar

Schad, J., Lewis, M.W., Raisch, S. et Smith, W.K. (2016). Paradox research in management science : looking back to move forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5-64.

Google Scholar

Scherer, A.G. et Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility : business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096-1120.

Google Scholar

Scherer, A.G. et Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world : a review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899-931.

Google Scholar

Scherer, A.G., Palazzo, G. et Seidl, D. (2013). Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments : sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 259-284.

Google Scholar

Slawinski, N. et Bansal, P. (2012). A matter of time : the temporal perspectives of organizational responses to climate change. Organization Studies, 33(11), 1537-1563.

Google Scholar

Slawinski, N. et Bansal, P. (2015). Short on time : intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organization Science, 26(2), 531-549.

Google Scholar

Smith, K.K. et Berg, D.N. (1987). Paradoxes of group life : understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

Google Scholar

Smith, W.K. (2014). Dynamic decision making : a model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1592-1623.

Google Scholar

Smith, W.K. et Lewis, M.W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox : a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381-403.

Google Scholar

Smith, W.K., Lewis, M.W. et Tushman, M.L. (2011). Organizational sustainability : organization design and senior leadership to enable strategic paradox. Dans K. Cameron et G. Spreitzer (dir.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (p. 798-810). New York, États-Unis, Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar

Smith, W.K. et Tushman, M.L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions : a top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522-536.

Google Scholar

Spence, M., Gherib, J. et Ondoua Biwolé, V. (2007). Développement durable et PME : une étude exploratoire des déterminants de leur engagement. Revue internationale PME, 20(3-4), 17-42.

Google Scholar

Sundaramurthy, C. et Lewis, M.W. (2003). Control and collaboration : paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397-415.

Google Scholar

Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. et Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.

Google Scholar

Temri, L. et Fort, F. (2009). Partage des bonnes pratiques de développement durable : le cas des PME agroalimentaires du Languedoc-Roussillon. Innovations, 29(1), 103-125.

Google Scholar

Torrès, O. (2015). Petitesse des entreprises et grossissement des effets de proximité. Revue française de gestion, 41(253), 333-352.

Google Scholar

Tracy, S.J. (2004). Dialectics, contradiction, or double bind ? Analyzing and theorizing employee reactions to organizational tension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 119-146.

Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. et Cunha, M.P. (2017). On organizational circularity. Dans W.K. Smith, M.W. Lewis, P. Jarzabkowski et A. Langley (dir.), The Handbook of organizational paradox. Oxford, Royaume-Uni, Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar

Van der Byl, C.A. et Slawinski, N. (2015). Embracing tensions in corporate sustainability : a review of research from win-wins and trade-offs to paradoxes and beyond. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 54-79.

Google Scholar

Vince, R. et Broussine, M. (1996). Paradox, defense and attachment : accessing and working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change. Organization Studies, 17(1), 1-21.

Google Scholar

Vogel, D. (2005). Is there a market for virtue ? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47(4), 19-45.

Google Scholar

Vogel, D. (2008). Le Marché de la vertu. Paris, Economica.

Google Scholar

Welsh, J.A. et White, J.F. (1981). A small business is not a little big business. Harvard Business Review, 59(4), 18-32.

Google Scholar

Zuindeau, B. (2007). Territorial equity and sustainable development. Environmental Values, 16(2), 253-268.

Google Scholar