This article investigates the results of a book sprint experience whose main objective was the development of instructional modules for an open textbook for the teaching of Spanish as a second language. Six graduate students at a public American university participated in the project for a week, working in pairs in the creation of activities that required the incorporation of the tenets of the dual pedagogical frameworks of performance- and literacy-based instruction (as realized through learning by design). Data were collected through both an opinion survey and the assessment of samples of the participants’ products. The results of the survey showed that graduate students felt that being part of the book sprint had been beneficial both at the professional and personal levels, but they had also experienced difficulties similar to those reported in previous studies. The products analyzed pointed to a lack of connection between the required pedagogical tenets and the materials developed, which has also been reported in existing works on pre- and in-service teachers as materials developers. The article discusses how these results could have been a consequence of the structure of the book sprint, and it offers recommendations for future activities of this kind.
- book sprints,
- open education,
- OER materials,
- second language pedagogy,
- graduate student professionalization
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
- Allen, H. W., & Paesani, K. (2010). Exploring the feasibility of a pedagogy of multiliteracies in introductory foreign language courses. L2 Journal, 2, 119-142. doi: 10.5070/L2219064
- American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2012). ACTFL performance descriptors for language learners. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL. Retrieved from https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/ACTFLPerformance-Descriptors.pdf
- Banfield, R., Lombardo, C. T., & Wax, T. (2016). Design sprint: A practical guidebook for building great digital products. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
- Blyth, C. (2014). Open educational resources and the new classroom ecology. The Modern Language Journal, 98, 662-664. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/43649910
- Bouckaert, M. (2018). Current perspectives on teachers as materials developers: Why, what, and how? RELC Journal, 50, 439-456. doi: 10.1177/0033688218810549
- Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015). The things you do to know: An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design (pp. 1-36). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445. doi: 10.2307/798843
- Green, A. G. (2016). Sprinting towards an open geography. In P. Blessinger & T. J. Bliss (Eds.), Open education: International perspectives in higher education (pp. 186-189). Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers. doi: 10.11647/OBP.0103
- Hyde, A. (2010). Book sprints and booki: Re-imagining how textbooks are produced. In R. T. Scholz (Ed.), Learning through digital media: Experiments in technology and pedagogy (pp. 241-247). New York, NY: The Institute for Distributed Creativity.
- Kean, M. (2012). Open source publishing, ‘book sprints’ and possible futures. Junctures, 15, 27-32. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293070452_Open_source_publishing_'book_sprints'_and_possible_futures
- Kuzborska, I. (2011). Teachers’ decision-making processes when designing EAP reading materials in a Lithuanian university setting. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 223-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.07.003
- Rossomondo, A. (2012). The Acceso project and foreign language graduate student development. In H. Allen & H. Maxim (Eds.), Educating the future foreign language professoriate for the 21st century (pp. 128-148). Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage.
- Taylor, C. (2016). Digital scholarship and writing sprints: An academic author perspective. Insights, 29(1), 26-30. doi: 10.1629/uksg.286
- Thayer, T. (2012). Book sprints: Fast track to rigorous open educational resources. Retrieved from http://www.education4site.org/blog/2012/booksprints-fast-track-torigorous-open-educational-resources/
- Thoms, J. J., & Thoms, B. L. (2014). Open educational resources in the United States: Insights from university foreign language directors. System, 45, 138-146. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2014.05.006
- Warner, C., & Dupuy, B. (2018). Moving toward multiliteracies in foreign language teaching: Past and present perspectives…and beyond. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 116-128. doi: 10.1111/flan.12316
- Zapata, G. C. (2017). OER Materials for L2 Spanish teaching: Performance-based activities for novice and intermediate L2 Spanish students. Retrieved from https://www.gzapatatexasam.com/open-source-pedagogical-material
- Zennaro, M., Canessa, E., Fonda, C., Belcher, M., & Flickenger, R. (2007). Book sprint: A new model for rapid book authoring and content development. International Journal of the Book, 4(1), 105-109. Retrieved from http://users.ictp.it/~mzennaro/BookSprint.pdf