ror.org/03zga2b32
Résumés
Abstract
While many strategies for protecting personal privacy rely on regulatory frameworks, consent, and anonymizing data, they are not always effective. Terms and Conditions often lag behind advances in technology, software, and user behaviours, and consent to use data for a range of unclear purposes may be provided unwittingly. As the commercial market for (student) data expands, so does the number of brokers who move, share and sell data across continents and legislative environments. This paper reviews four Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) providers from different geopolitical and regulatory contexts. It explores how consent to collect and use data is described to potential users, and how that consent applies at micro, meso, and macro levels.This paper proposes a need for greater transparency around the implications of users granting consent at the point of registration. Further, it highlights that though MOOC providers have a responsibility to make clear the potential uses and sharing of user data, users themselves should also be more aware and consider how meaningful student agency can be achieved.
Keywords:
- consent,
- massive open online course (MOOC),
- micro,
- meso,
- macro,
- privacy,
- policy
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire. Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
-
Ball, K., Haggerty, K.D., & Lyon, D. (2012). Routledge handbook of surveillance studies. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Bellman, S., Johnson, E.J., & Lohse, G.L. (2001). On site: to opt in or opt-out?: It depends on the question. Communications of the ACM, 44(2), 25-27. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=359241
10.1145/359205.359241 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Bennett, C. J. (2018). The European general data protection regulation: An instrument for the globalization of privacy standards? Information Polity, (Preprint), 1-8. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3813/041fc44467933d64c54c3e39a467c2be63c3.pdf
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Bos, W., & Tarnai, C. (1999). Content analysis in empirical social research. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(8), 659-671. doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00032-4
10.1016/s0883-0355(99)00032-4 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Buckingham Shum, S. (2012). Learning analytics. UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education. Retrieved from http://iite.unesco.org/files/policy_briefs/pdf/en/learning_analytics.pdf
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Cormack, A.N. (2016). Downstream consent: A better legal framework for Big Data. Journal of Information Rights, Policy and Practice, 1(1). doi: 10.21039/irpandp.v1i1.9
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Crawford, K., & Schultz, J. (2013). Big data and due process: Towards a framework to redress predictive privacy harms. Boston College Law Review, 55(1). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2325784
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Drachsler, H., & Kalz, M. (2016). The MOOC and learning analytics innovation cycle (MOLAC): A reflective summary of ongoing research and its challenges. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 281-290. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12135
10.1111/jcal.12135 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Fairfield, J.A.T. (2017). Owned: Property, privacy, and the new digital serfdom. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5/6) 304-317. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/36374/1/IJTEL40501_Ferguson%20Jan%202013.pdf
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let's not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64-71. doi: 10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x
10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Hern, A. (2018, April 19). Facebook moves 1.5bn users out of reach of new European privacy law [Blog post]. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/19/facebook-moves-15bn-users-out-of-reach-of-new-european-privacy-law
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Kehr, F., Kowatsch, T., Wentzel, D., & Fleisch, E. (2015). Blissfully ignorant: The effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus. Information Systems Journal, 25(6), 607-635. doi: 10.1111/isj.12062
10.1111/isj.12062 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Khalil, M., Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2018, June 26-28). The unbearable lightness of consent: Mapping MOOC providers' response to consent. In Proceedings of the fifth annual ACM conference on learning at scale. London, United Kingdom: ACM. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3231659
10.1145/3231644.3231659 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Khalil, M., Taraghi, B., & Ebner, M. (2016). Engaging learning analytics in MOOCs: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and New Developments (END 2016; pp. 3-7). Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Krasnova, H., Veltri, N. F., & Günther, O. (2012). Self-disclosure and privacy calculus on social networking sites: The role of culture. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 4(3), 127-135. doi: 10.1007/s12599-012-0216-6
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Lane, J., Stodden, V., Bender, S., & Nissenbaum, H. (Eds.). (2015). Privacy, big data, and the public good. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Leitner, P., Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2017). Learning analytics in higher education - a literature review. In A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Learning analytics: Fundamentals, applications, and trends (pp. 1-23). Springer, Cham.
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Long, P., & Siemens, G. (2011a). Message from the LAK 2011 general & program chairs. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on learning analytics & knowledge. Alberta, Canada: ACM. Retrieved from https://portalparts.acm.org/2100000/2090116/fm/frontmatter.pdf?ip=129.177.96.37
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Long, P., & Siemens, G. (2011b). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30-32. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2011/9/penetrating-the-fog-analytics-in-learning-and-education
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Meyer, R. (2018, March 20). The Cambridge Analytica scandal, in three paragraphs [Blog post]. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/03/the-cambridge-analytica-scandal-in-three-paragraphs/556046/
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Miltgen, C. L., & Smith, H. J. (2015). Exploring information privacy regulation, risks, trust, and behaviour. Information & Management, 52(6), 741-759. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2015.06.006
10.1016/j.im.2015.06.006 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Miyazaki, D., & Fernandez, A. (2000). Internet privacy and security: An examination of online retailer disclosures. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(1), 54-61. doi: 10.1509/jppm.19.1.54.16942
10.1509/jppm.19.1.54.16942 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society. The secret algorithms that control money and information. London: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. A. (2014). Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 49-64. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.17.4.49.pdf
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Payne, R. (2014). Frictionless sharing and digital promiscuity. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 11(2), 85-102. doi: 10.1080/14791420.2013.873942
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2015, March). Student privacy self-management: Implications for learning analytics. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 83-92). ACM. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2723576.2723585
10.1145/2723576.2723585 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2017). Ethics and learning analytics: charting the (un)charted. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. Wise, & D. Gašević (Eds.), Learning analytics handbook (pp. 49-57). Edmonton, AB, Canada: Society of Learning Analytics.
10.18608/hla17.004 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Rule, P., & John, V. (2011). Case study research. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Russell, N.C., Reidenberg, J.R., Martin, E., & Norton, T.B. (June 6, 2018). Transparency and the marketplace for student data. Virginia Journal of Law and Technology, Forthcoming. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3191436
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Sclater, N. (2017a, February 16). Consent for learning analytics: some practical guidance for institutions [Blog post]. Jisc. Retrieved from https://analytics.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2017/02/16/consent-for-learning-analytics-some-practical-guidance-for-institutions/
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Sclater, N. (2017b, June 30). Consent and the GDPR: What approaches are universities taking? [Blog post]. Jisc. Retrieved from https://analytics.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2017/06/30/consent-and-the-gdpr-what-approaches-are-universities-taking/
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Sclater, N. (2018, June 1). GDPR and learning analytics - Frequently asked questions [Blog post]. Jisc. Retrieved from https://analytics.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2018/06/01/gdpr-and-learning-analytics-frequently-asked-questions/
10.3139/9783446432826.018 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380-1400. doi: 10.1177/0002764213498851
10.1177/0002764213498851 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist 57(10), 1509-1528. doi: 10.1177/0002764213479366
10.1177/0002764213479366 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Solove, D. J. (2004). The digital person: Technology and privacy in the information age. New York, USA: New York University Press.
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Solove, D.J. (2013). Introduction: Privacy self-management and the consent dilemma. Harvard Law Review 126(7), 1880-1904.
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Tene, O., & Polonetsky, J. (2012). Big data for all: Privacy and user control in the age of analytics. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 239, 1-36. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nwteintp11&id=265&collection=journals
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Thomas, G. (2011). How to do your case study: A guide for students and researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Young, E. (2014). Educational privacy in the online classroom: FERPA, MOOCs, and the big data conundrum. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 28(2), 549-592. Retrieved from http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/articles/pdf/v28/28HarvJLTech549.pdf
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
-
Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B.M. (2009) Qualitative analysis of content. In B. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in Information and library science (pp. 308-319). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar