Résumés
Abstract
Very little research has been conducted about what it is like to teach a MOOC. Given this, a mixed methods study, involving a survey of 186 MOOC instructors and 15 follow-up interviews, was conducted to explore the motivation, experiences, and perceptions of instructors who have taught massive open online courses. Findings indicate that instructors were motivated to teach MOOCs for three main reasons: (1) interest and passion, (2) publicity and marketing, or (3) benefits and incentives. Most instructors had little online teaching experience prior to teaching their first MOOC, but were satisfied with the experience. The majority believed their own MOOC provided a high quality learning experience but thought that MOOCs overall might not be as good as face-to-face courses. Concerns were raised about the future of MOOCs for online learning.
Keywords:
- massive open online courses,
- MOOCs,
- online teaching,
- online learning,
- instructional design
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Adams, C., Yin, Y., Vargas Madriz, L. F., & Mullen, C. S. (2014). A phenomenology of learning large: The tutorial sphere of xMOOC video lectures. Distance Education, 35, 202-216. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2014.917701
- Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., & Leskovec, J. (2014). Engaging with massive online courses. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 687-698). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. doi: 10.1145/2566486.2568042
- Ballester, S. (2016, November 24). Massive Open Online Course (MOOCs) types. [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://project.ecolearning.eu/mooc-types/
- Bonk, C. J., Lee. M. M., Reeves, T. C., & Reynolds, T. H. (2017). The emergence and design of massive open online courses (MOOCs). In R. A. Reiser, & J. V. Demsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed.; pp. 250-258). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX's first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8(1), 13-25. Retrieved from http://www.rpajournal.com/studying-learning-in-the-worldwide-classroom-research-into-edxs-first-mooc/
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2017). Understanding learning and teaching in MOOCs from the perspectives of students and instructors: A review of the literature from 2014 to 2016. In K. C. Delgado, P. Jermann, M. Pérez-Sanagustín, D. Seaton, & S. White (Eds.), Digital education: Out to the world and back to the campus, EMOOCs 2017. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 10254; pp. 176-181). New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-59044-8_20
- Downes, S. (2013). What the 'x' in 'xMOOC' stands for [G+ post]. Retrieved from https://plus.google.com/+StephenDownes/posts/LEwaKxL2MaM
- Dunlap, J. (2005). Workload reduction in online courses: Getting some shuteye. Performance Improvement, 44(5), 18-25. doi: 10.1002/pfi.4140440507
- Ebben, M., & Murphy, J. S. (2014). Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: A review of nascent MOOC scholarship. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 328-345. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2013.878352
- Evans, S., & Myrick, J. G. (2015). How MOOC instructors view the pedagogy and purposes of massive open online courses. Distance Education, 36, 295-311. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1081736
- Fergusen, R., Sharples, M., & Beale, R. (2015). MOOCs 2030: A future for massive online learning. In C. J. Bonk, M. M. Lee, T. C. Reeves, & T. H. Reynolds (Eds.), MOOCs and open education around the world (pp. 315-326). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC research initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 134-176. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1954
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
- Haavind, S., & Sistek-Chandler, C. (2015). The emergent role of the MOOC instructor: A qualitative study of trends toward improving future practice. International Journal on E-Learning, 14, 331-350.
- Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014a). MOOCs: Expectations and reality. Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from http://cbcse.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/MOOCs_Expectations_and_Reality.pdf
- Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014b). Resource requirements and costs of developing and delivering MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 113-133. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1901
- Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1651
- Kim, S-W. (2016). MOOCs in higher education. In D. Cvetkovic (Ed.), Virtual learning, Ch.8 [Electronic book]. Retrieved from https://www.intechopen.com/books/virtual-learning/moocs-in-higher-education
- Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 170-179). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). doi: 10.1145/2460296.2460330
- Lowenthal, P. R., & Hodges, C. (2015). In search of quality: Using quality matters to analyze the quality of massive, open, online courses (MOOCs). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 83-101. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2348
- Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Moe, R. (2015). The brief & expansive history (and future) of the MOOC: Why two divergent models share the same name. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 2(1). Retrieved from http://scholarworks.umb.edu/ciee/vol2/iss1/2/
- Najafi, H., Rolheiser, C., Harrison, L., & Haklev, S. (2015). University of Toronto instructors' experiences with developing MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 233-255. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2073
- Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). Taking the "Q" out of research: Teaching research methodology courses without the divide between quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Quality & Quantity, 39, 267-296. doi: 10.1007/s11135-004-1670-0
- Ross, J., Sinclair, C., Knox, J., Bayne, S., & Macleod, H. (2014). Teacher experiences and academic identity: The missing components of MOOC pedagogy. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10, 57-69. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no1/ross_0314.pdf
- Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm
- Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2016). A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013-2015. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17, 198-221. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2448/3655
- Wiley, D. (2015). The MOOC misstep and open education. In C. J. Bonk, M. M. Lee, T. C. Reeves, & T. H. Reynolds, T. H. (Eds.), MOOCs and open education around the world (pp. 3-11). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Wilson, B. G., Ludwig-Hardman, S., Thornam, C. L., & Dunlap, J. (2004). Bounded community: Designing and facilitating learning communities in formal courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/204/286
- Zheng, S., Wisniewski, P., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2016). Ask the instructors: Motivations and challenges of teaching massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 206-221). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). doi: 10.1145/2818048.2820082