Résumés
Abstract
There is a growing body of literature that recognizes the role Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) can play in improving access to education globally, and particularly to thousands of people in developing and developed countries. There is increasing concern, however, that the millions of displaced refugee learners throughout Europe, the Middle East, and other regions are still disadvantaged when it comes to engaging in learning through MOOCs. The reasons for this disadvantage range from a lack of appropriate infrastructure or other supporting structures, to a lack of contextualized content. So far, little attention has been paid to contextualized MOOC models, which may both impact policies and be adapted to the specific needs of these learners who often do not have the means to access many education opportunities. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to propose a frugally-engineered MOOC model that addresses the barriers of access and participation for refugees. This paper engages in an exploratory research methodology, using findings from the literature and expert opinions gathered through interviews. These findings lead to the development of what the authors call a Frugal MOOC Model which can be contextualized to meet the needs of refugee learners. The paper goes on to highlight the development of the Frugal MOOC Model as the first phase of an ongoing study. It concludes with recommendations for the next phase of the study: how to implement the newly developed model.
Keywords:
- MOOCs,
- Frugal MOOCs,
- frugal innovations,
- human rights,
- contextualized education,
- sustainability,
- cross-cultural designs,
- open educational resources,
- implementation
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Anthony, S., & Keating, M. S. (2013). The difficulties of online learning for Indigenous Australian students living in remote communities — It’s an issue of access. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 16(2), 1-10.
- Basu, R. R., Banerjee, P. M., & Sweeny, E. G. (2013). Frugal innovation: Core competencies to address global sustainability. Journal of Management for Global Sustainability, 1(2), 63-82
- Betts, A., Bloom, L., Kaplan, J., & Omata, N. (2017). Refugee economies: Forced displacement and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Blanden, J; & Machin, S. (2004). Educational inequality and the expansion of UK higher education. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 51(2), 230-249.
- Calonge, D. S., & Shah, M. A. (2016). MOOCs, graduate skills gaps, and employability: a qualitative systematic review of the literature. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5), 67-90.
- Clark, L. S. (2003). Challenges of social good in the world of grand theft auto and Barbie: A case study of a community computer center for youth. New Media & Society, 5(1), 95-116.
- Ernst and Young LLP. (2013). Higher Education in India: Vision 2030. Retreived from http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Higher-education-in-India-Vision-2030/$FILE/EY-Higher-education-in-India-Vision-2030.pdf
- European Commission. (2016). Challenges and priorities for 2016. Our world in 2016, new Europe. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/2014-2019/stylianides/announcements/challenges-and-priorities-2016-our-world-2016-new-europe-5-january-2016_en
- Forker, L. B., & Mendez, D. (2001). An analytical method for benchmarking best peer suppliers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1/2), 195-209.
- Fuchs, H. J. (2013). From “premium” to “good enough”: Frugal innovation in the emerging markets. Innovation Management.se. Retrieved from http://www.innovationmanagement.se/2015/06/23/from-premium-to-good-enough-frugal-innovation-in-the-emerging-markets/
- Fujii, S. (2006). Environmental concern, attitude toward frugality, and ease of behavior as determinants of pro-environmental behavior intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 262-268.
- Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 1-26.
- Guàrdia, L., Maina, M., & Sangrà, A. (2013). MOOC design principles: A pedagogical approach from the learner’s perspective. eLearning Papers, (33). Retrieved from https://oerknowledgecloud.org/content/mooc-design-principles-pedagogical-approach-learner-perspective
- Gunawardena, C. (2014, March 19). MOOCs: Students in the global south are wary of a “sage on the stage.” The Guardian. Retreived from http://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/mar/19/cost-barrier-students-global-south
- Hargittai, E. (2001). Second-level digital divide: Mapping differences in people’s online skills. Unpublished Manuscript TPRC 2001. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/0109068.pdf
- Hood, N., Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Context counts: How learners’ contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 91, 83-91.
- Jain, B., Gopalakrishnan, G., Mehra, L., Kennegal, M., Upadhyay, M., Pankaj, R., & Baxi, V. (2014). MOOCs and the future of Indian higher education. The Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry, 1-28.
- Johnson, W. (1978). Muddling toward frugality. Boulder, CO: Shambhala Publications, Inc.
- Khanna, T., Palepu, K. G., & Sinha, J. (2005). Strategies that fit emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 83(6), 4-19.
- Knorringa, P., Pesa, I., Leliveld, A., & Van Beers, C. (2016). Frugal innovation and development: Aides or adversaries? The European Journal of Development Research, 28(2), 148-153.
- Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 19-38.
- Lane, A., Caird, S., & Weller, M. (2014). The potential social, economic and environmental benefits of MOOCs: Operational and historical comparisons with a massive “closed online” course. Open Praxis, 6(2), 115-123.
- Lehner, A.-C., & Gausemeier, J. (2016). A pattern-based approach to the development of frugal innovations. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(3), 13-21.
- Lewin, K., & Caillods, F. (2001). Financing secondary education in developing countries: Strategies for sustainable growth. UNESCO: International Institute for Educational Planning. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001248/124844e.pdf
- Lorisika, I., Cremonini, L., & Safar Jalani, M. (2015). Study to Design a Programme/Clearinghouse Providing Access to Higher Education for Syrian Refugees and Internal Displaced Persons. European Union/PROMAN. Final report.
- Mendenhall, M., Russell, S. G., & Buckner, E. (2017). Urban Refugee Education: Strengthening Policies and Practices for Access, Quality, and Inclusion, Columbia University Academic Commons. doi: 10.7916/D8R49WGP
- Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. CA: SAGE.
- Moser-Mercer, B. (2014). MOOCs in fragile contexts. In Proceedings of the European MOOCs Stakeholders Summit (pp.114-121). Lausanne.
- Mukerjee, K. (2012). Frugal innovation: the key to penetrating emerging markets. Ivey Business Journal, 76(4).
- Palin, A. (2014, March 10). MOOCs: Young students from developing countries are still in the minority. The Financial Times Limited. Retrieved from http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/8a81f66e-9979-11e3-b3a2-00144feab7de.html#axzz3IMu1apRT
- Pansera, M., & Sarkar, S. (2016). Crafting sustainable development solutions: frugal innovations of grassroots entrepreneurs. Sustainability, 8(1), 51.
- Pathak, R., Pandey, D. K., & Vashisht, A. (2016). Importance of Indian higher education and industrial realations in global economy. Global Journal of Engineering, Science & Social Science Studies, 2(5), 1-10.
- Patton, M.W. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Perris, K. (2014, Sptember 12). MOOC on MOOCs? A novel yet pragmatic approach. University World News. Retrieved from http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20140903154113518
- Pityana, N. B. (2009). Open distance learning in the developing world: Trends, progress and challenges. Retrieved from http://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/411/ICDEMaastricht250609.pdf;sequence=1
- Radjou, N., & Prabhu, J. (2014, December 10). What frugal innovators do. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2014/12/what-frugal-innovators-do
- Ratwatte, C. (2013 December 24). MOOCs and the developing world. Colombo Telegraph. Retrieved from https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/moocs-and-the-developing-world/
- Rodriguez, C. O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford-like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 15(2). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ982976.pdf
- Santandreu, D. (2017). Have disruptive innovations arrived at the gates of academia? (Doctoral thesis, University of West England). Available from http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/27223/
- Sen Gupta, A. K., & Parekh, V. (2009). Excellence in higher education in India: Way forward. Journal of Emerging Knowledge on Emerging Markets, 1(1), 171-180. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=jekem
- Shah, M.A. (2020). MOOCs without borders. Investigating the dynamics of a contextualised approach to scalable online learning. (Doctoral thesis, Lancaster University). Avaliable from https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk
- Shah, M., Wagner, C., & Oztok, M. (2015). Drivers of MOOC sustainability: A comparison of the US and India. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 18(1), 1-8.
- Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63-75. doi: 10.3316/QRJ1102063
- Talwar, K. (2003). The price of truth: Frugality in truthful mechanisms. In STACS. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/3-540-36494-3_53
- Tiwari, R., Fischer, L., & Kalogerakis, K. (2016). Frugal innovation in scholarly and social siscourse: An assessment of trends and potential societal implications. Leipzig. Retrieved from http://www.global-innovation.net/publications/PDF/Tiwari_et_al_2016_Frugal_Innovation_BMBF_ITA.pdf
- Trucano, M. (2014, December 19). How many schools are connected to the internet? [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://blogs.worldbank.org/edutech/how-many-schools-are-connected-internet
- Tyson, J. (2016, March 22). 7 ways to apply tech to refugee education. Devex.com. Retrieved from http://www.devex.com/news/7-ways-to-apply-tech-to-refugee-education-87809
- UNCESCR. (1999). United Nations committee on economic, social and cultural rights. general comment No. 13: The right to education (Art. 13 of the Covenant), para. 6. (Doc. E/C.12/1999/10.) (CESCR General Comment 13). Retrieved from http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838c22.pdf
- United Nations High Commission for Refugees. (2019). Figures at a glance. Retreived from https://www.unhcr.org/figures-at-a-glance.html
- United Nations High Commission for Refugees. (2016a). Connecting refugees: How internet and mobile connectivity can improve refugee well-being and transform humanitarian action, 2016, s. 33. Retrieved from http://www.unhcr.org/5770d43c4
- United Nations High Commission for Refugees. (2016b). Missing out: Refugee education in crisis. Retrieved from http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/missing-out-refugee-education-in-crisis_unhcr_2016-en.pdf
- Wells, D. (2013, July 19). MOOCs on the move from colleges to companies [Blog post]. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/insights/2013/07/moocs-on-the-move-from-colleges-to-companies/
- Winkler, K. (2014). MOOCs in India = Indian MOOCs? EDUKWEST. Retrieved from http://www.edukwest.com/moocs-india-indian-moocs/
- Yuan, L., Powell, S., & Cetis, J. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. Cetis White Paper. Retrieved from http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2013/667
- Zeschky, M., Widenmayer, B., & Gassmann, O. (2011). Frugal innovation in emerging markets. Research-Technology Management, 54(4), 38-45. doi: 10.5437/08956308X5404007