Résumés
Abstract
It is well known that there are disparities in access to education around the world, with developed countries generally having better educational resources and opportunities compared to developing countries. Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have been proposed as a way to bridge this gap by providing free or low-cost online education to anyone with an Internet connection. This study aimed to better understand the effects of location, both country and region, on the use of MOOCs, using data from 3.5 million learners who registered for MOOCs offered by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). The data set provided a broad picture of how MOOCs are being used around the globe. The results of the study indicated significant differences in the use of MOOCs among students from different countries and their corresponding economic levels. In order to address these differences and improve access to education through MOOCs, the study suggested several actions that could be taken. These include providing better infrastructure and support for MOOC learners in developing countries, increasing awareness of and access to MOOCs in these regions, and working to improve the quality and relevance of MOOC offerings. Overall, the study highlighted the potential of MOOCs to bridge the educational gap between developed and developing countries, but also emphasized the need for continued efforts to remove barriers and improve access to these resources.
Keywords:
- massive open online courses,
- geographic region,
- country's income level,
- distance education,
- online learning
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire. Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Aboshady, O. A., Radwan, A. E., Eltaweel, A. R., Azzam, A., Aboelnaga, A. A., Hashem, H. A., Darwish, S. Y., Salah, R., Kotb, O. N., Afifi, A. M., Noaman, A. M., Salem, D. S., & Hassouna, A. (2015). Perception and use of massive open online courses among medical students in a developing country: Multicentre cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006804Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Arpaci, I., Al-Emran, M., & Al-Sharafi, M. A. (2020). The impact of knowledge management practices on the acceptance of massive open online courses (MOOCs) by engineering students: A cross-cultural comparison. Telematics and Informatics, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101468Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Cagiltay, N. E., Cagiltay, K., & Celik, B. (2020). An analysis of course characteristics, learner characteristics, and certification rates in MITx MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4698Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Castillo, N. M., Lee, J., Zahra, F. T., & Wagner, D. A. (2015). MOOCs for development: trends, challenges, and opportunities. Information Technologies and International Development, 11(2).Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Chaker, R., & Bachelet, R. (2020). Internationalizing professional development: Using educational data mining to analyze learners’ performance and dropouts in a French MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(4), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i4.4787Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. (2013). The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes massive open online courses and why? SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2350964Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3(18). https://doi.org/10.5334/2012-18Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Dell’Acqua, S. (2014). Massive open online courses (MOOCs): Is it real democracy? European Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v1no2a4Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Du, Z., Wang, F., Wang, S., & Xiao, X. (2022). Online listening responses and e-learning performance. Information Technology & People. (Early Access). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-09-2021-0687Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- El Said, G. R. (2017). Understanding how learners use massive open online courses and why they drop out: Thematic analysis of an interview study in a developing country. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(5), 724–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116681302Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Emanuel, E. J. (2013). MOOCs taken by educated few. Nature, 503, 342–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/503342aGoogle Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Essex, C., & Cagiltay, K. (2001). Evaluating an online course: Feedback from “distressed” students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(3), 233–239.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., &Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (Vol. 7). McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Frane, A. V. (2015). Power and type I error control for univariate comparisons in multivariate two-group designs. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.968836Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Gameel, B. G., & Wilkins, K. G. (2019). When it comes to MOOCs, where you are from makes a difference. Computers and Education, 136, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.014Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Garrido, M., Koepke, L., Anderson, S., & Mena, A. F. (2016). The Advancing MOOCs for Development Initiative: An examination of MOOC usage for professional workforce development outcomes in Colombia, the Philippines, & South Africa (TASCHA Report). Seattle: University of Washington Information School. Retrieved from https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/bitstream/handle/1773/35647/Advancing_MOOCs_for_Development_Final_Report_2016_Final.pdfGoogle Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Ho, A. D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S. O., Seaton, D. T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., & Chuang, I. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses, Fall 2012–Summer 2013. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2381263Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Kizilcec, R. F., Saltarelli, A. J., Reich, J., & Cohen, G. L. (2017). Closing global achievement gaps in MOOCs. Science, 355(6322), 251–252. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2063Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Lee, J., Hong, A., & Hwang, J. (2018). A review of massive open online courses : MOOC’s approach to bridge the digital divide. 22nd Biennial Conference of the International Telecommunications Society, Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202–227. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Ma, L., & Lee, C. S. (2019). Understanding the barriers to the use of MOOCs in a developing country: An innovation resistance perspective. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118757732Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Olson, C. L. (1979). Practical considerations in choosing a MANOVA test statistic: A rejoinder to Stevens. Psychological Bulletin, 86(5), 1350–1352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.6.1350Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533–544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-yGoogle Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Rohs, M., & Ganz, M. (2015). MOOCs and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by empirical data. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2033Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Shah, D., Pickard, L., & Ma, R. (2022). Massive list of MOOC platforms around the world in 2023. https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-platforms/Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Shavelson, R. J., Brophy, M., & Obemeata, J. O. (1985). Evaluation of nonformal education programs: The applicability and utility of the criterion-sampling approach. UNESCO Institute for Education.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Shcherbinin, M., Kruchinin, S. V., & Ivanov, A. G. (2019). MOOC and MOOC degrees: new learning paradigm and its specifics. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 10, 1-14. https://tuengr.com/V10A/10A19K.pdfGoogle Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Stevens, J. P. (1980). Power of the multivariate analysis of variance tests. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 728–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.728Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Pearson Education.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Tahirsylaj, A., Mann, B., & Matson, J. (2018). Teaching creativity at scale: Overcoming language barriers in a MOOC. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 4(2), 1-9.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Tong, T., & Li, H. (2018). Demand for MOOC: An application of big data. China Economic Review, 51, 194–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.05.007Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Warusavitarana, P. A., Lokuge Dona, K., Piyathilake, H. C., Epitawela, D. D., & Edirisinghe, M. U. (2014). MOOC: A higher education game changer in developing countries. In B. Hegarty, J. McDonald, & S.-K. Loke (Eds.), Rhetoric and reality: Critical perspectives on educational technology. Proceedings ascilite Dunedin 2014 (pp. 359-366). https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/dunedin2014/files/fullpapers/321-Warusavitarana.pdfGoogle Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar

