Résumés
Abstract
Several barriers hinder students from producing clear and impactful written work. Writing assignments are often given on an individual basis, similar to homework, and without any assistance. Students in a classroom context have access to both their classmates and the teacher while they are working in groups or pairs as part of their assignments. The majority of students, however, are clueless about how to begin their homework assignments. The introduction of artificial intelligence in education may help solve this problem. The current research intended to demonstrate the effects of employing automated writing evaluation (AWE) in fostering learners’ writing skills, motivation to write, enjoyment of writing, and academic buoyancy in open and distributed English as a foreign language (EFL) learning. The participants were 86 intermediate EFL students from China. The participants in the experimental group (n = 44) received instruction and feedback from their teachers only; participants in the control group (n = 42) were exposed to their teachers’ instruction as well as AWE. The results of data analysis via one-way multivariate analysis of variance indicated that the participants in the experimental group outperformed their peers in the control group in motivation to write, enjoyment in writing, academic buoyancy, and academic success in writing. Further in-depth discussions proceed regarding the implications of the study.
Keywords:
- artificial intelligence,
- motivation to write,
- enjoyment in writing,
- academic buoyancy,
- academic success in writing,
- automated writing evaluation,
- open and distributed learning
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Alves-Wold, A., Walgermo, B. R., McTigue, E., & Per Henning Uppstad, H. P. (2023). Assessing writing motivation: A systematic review of K-5 students’ self-reports. Educational Psychology Review, 35, Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09732-6
- Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
- Cahyono, B. Y., & Rahayu, T. (2020). EFL students’ motivation in writing, writing proficiency, and gender. TEFLIN Journal, 31(2), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v31i2/162-180
- Cao, L. L. (2020). Comparison of automatic and expert teachers’ rating of computerized English listening–speaking test. English Language Teaching, 13(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n1p18
- Chapelle, C. A., Cotos, E., & Lee, J. (2015). Validity arguments for diagnostic assessment using automated writing evaluation. Language Testing, 32(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214565386
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
- Ding, J., & He, L. (2022). On the association between Chinese EFL teachers’ academic buoyancy, self-efficacy, and burnout. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.947434
- Dougherty, P. (2015). Creative writing in English and EFL students: Finding motivation in self-expression. East West Journal of Humanities, 5, 1–14. http://lib.ewubd.edu:8080/handle/2525/2785
- Hartfiel, V. F., Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraft, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., & Hughey, J. B. (1985). Learning ESL composition. Newbury House.
- Heydarnejad, T., Abdel Al Ibrahim, K. A., Abdelrasheed, N. S. G., & Rezvani, E. (2022). The effect of academic emotion regulation on EFL learners’ core of self-assessment and academic buoyancy: A structural equation modeling. Language Testing in Asia, 12, Article 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00207-z
- Jahedizadeh, S., Ghonsooly, B., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2019). Academic buoyancy in higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2018-0067
- Jin, Y. (2023). The development and validation of the English writing enjoyment scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 130(1), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125221137649
- Jin, Y. X., & Dewaele, J. M. (2018). The effect of positive orientation and perceived social support on foreign language classroom anxiety. System, 74, 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.01.002
- Lang, F., Li, S., & Zhang, S. (2019). Research on reliability and validity of mobile networks-based automated writing evaluation. International Journal of Mobile Computing and Multimedia Communications, 10(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMCMC.2019010102
- LaSalle, D. (2015). Intrinsic motivation and the five-paragraph essay: Lessons learned on practitioner research, the role of academic research in the classroom, and assessing changes in student motivation. Perspectives on Urban Education, 12(1). https://urbanedjournal.gse.upenn.edu/archive/volume-12-issue-1-spring-2015/intrinsic-motivation-and-five-paragraph-essay-lessons-learned-
- Lee, I., & Wong, K. (2014). Bringing innovation to EFL writing: The case of a primary school in Hong Kong. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(1), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0149-y
- Li, W.-Y., Kau, K., & Yi-Jiun Shiung. (2023). Pedagogic exploration into adapting automated writing evaluation and peer review integrated feedback into large-sized university writing classes. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231209087
- Li, J., Link, S., & Hegelheimer, V. (2015). Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback in ESL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.10.004
- Li, R., Meng, Z., Tian, M., Zhang, Z., Ni, C., & Xiao, W. (2019). Examining EFL learners’ individual antecedents on the adoption of automated writing evaluation in China. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 784–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1540433
- Li, Z. (2021). Teachers in automated writing evaluation (AWE) system-supported ESL writing classes: Perception, implementation, and influence. System, 99, Article 102505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102505
- Liao, H. C. (2016). Using automated writing evaluation to reduce grammar errors in writing. ELT Journal, 70(3), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv058
- Lo, J., & Hyland, F. (2007). Enhancing students’ engagement and motivation in writing: The case of primary students in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.002
- MacIntyre, P. D., & Mercer, S. (2014). Introducing positive psychology to SLA. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.2
- Martin, A. J. (2013). Academic buoyancy and academic resilience: Exploring “everyday” and “classic” resilience in the face of academic adversity. School Psychology International, 34(5), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034312472759
- Martin, A. J. (2014). Academic buoyancy and academic outcomes: Towards a further understanding of students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), students without ADHD, and academic buoyancy itself. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 86–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12007
- Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., Brackett, M. A., Malmberg, L. E., & Hall, J. (2013). Academic buoyancy and psychological risk: Exploring reciprocal relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.06.006
- Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20149
- Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008). Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students’ everyday academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46(1), 53–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.01.002
- Mo, H. (2012). A study of the teaching of ESL writing in colleges in China. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n1p118
- Mohsen, M. A., & Abdulaziz, A. (2019). The effectiveness of using a hybrid mode of automated writing evaluation system on EFL students’ writing. Teaching English With Technology, 19(1), 118–131. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1204544
- Myhill, D., Cremin, T., & Oliver, L. (2023). The impact of a changed writing environment on students’ motivation to write. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1212940. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212940
- Nasihah, M., & Cahyono, B. (2017). Language learning strategies, motivation, and writing achievement of Indonesian EFL students. Arab World English Journal, 8(1), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no1.18
- Nurjamin, A., Salazar-Espinoza, D. E., Saenko, N., & Bina, E. (2023). Learner-oriented assessment matters: Testing the effects of academic buoyancy, reflective thinking, and learner enjoyment in self-assessment and test-taking anxiety management of the EFL learners. Language Testing in Asia, 13, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00247-z
- Richards, J. C. (2022). Exploring emotions in language teaching. RELC Journal, 53(1), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220927531
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). Promoting self-determined school engagement: Motivation, learning, and well-being. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 171–195). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203879498
- Sumakul, D. T. Y. G., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022a). Artificial intelligence in EFL classrooms: Friend or foe? LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 232–256. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/256723
- Sumakul, D. T. Y. G., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022b). Students’ perceptions of the use of AI in a writing class. In Proceedings of the 67th TEFLIN International Virtual Conference & the 9th ICOELT 2021 (pp. 52–57). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220201.009
- Sun, T., & Wang, C. (2020). College students’ writing self-efficacy and writing self-regulated learning strategies in learning English as a foreign language. System, 90, Article 102221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102221
- Tang, J., & Wu, Y. (2017). Impact of AWE rubrics and automated assessment on EFL writing instruction. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.2017040104
- Tian, L., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context. System, 91, Article 102247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102247
- Utami, S. P. T., Andayani, Winarni, R., & Sumarwati. (2023). Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive? Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), Article ep450. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419
- White, R., & Arndt, V. (1991). Process writing. Longman.
- Xu, X., & Wang, B. (2022). EFL students’ academic buoyancy: does academic motivation and interest matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858054
- Yun, S., Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2018). Academic buoyancy: Exploring learners’ everyday resilience in the language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(4), 805–830. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000037
- Zhai, N., & Ma, X. (2022). Automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback: A systematic investigation of college students’ acceptance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2817–2842. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1897019
- Zumbrunn, S., Marrs, S., Broda, M., Ekholm, E., DeBusk-Lane, M., & Jackson, L. (2019). Toward a more complete understanding of writing enjoyment: A mixed methods study of elementary students. AERA Open, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419850792