Résumés
Résumé
La rétroaction suite à l’évaluation du rendement est un processus qui favorise l’actualisation de soi et le rendement. Toutefois, les employés peuvent percevoir ce processus comme contrôlant et ainsi occasionner une baisse de motivation au travail. Cet article vise à augmenter l’incidence de la rétroaction sur la motivation des employés. Un cadre comportemental fondé sur la théorie de l’auto-détermination et que les gestionnaires peuvent mettre en pratique est proposé. L’application du cadre contribue à la satisfaction des besoins, ce qui, comme le prédit la théorie, augmente la motivation autonome, le bien-être et le rendement.
Mots-clés :
- évaluation du rendement,
- rétroaction,
- motivation,
- besoins psychologiques fondamentaux
Abstract
Performance appraisal and feedback is a crucial process aiming at maximizing individual growth and performance. However, this process may be perceived as controlling by employees which can decrease their motivation at work. The present paper aims at improving the impact of performance feedback on worker motivation. A behavioral framework based on self-determination theory and that managers can implement is presented. The framework helps increase employees’ needs satisfaction, which the theory predicts, increases employees’ autonomous motivation, well-being and performance at work.
Keywords:
- Performance appraisal,
- feedback,
- motivation,
- basic psychological needs
Resumen
La retroacción que sigue a una evaluación del rendimiento es un proceso que favorece la actualización de sí y el rendimiento. Sin embargo, los empleados pueden percibir ese proceso como un control y esto puede producir una disminución de la motivación para el trabajo. Este artículo apunta a aumentar la incidencia de la retroacción sobre la motivación de los empleados. Se propone un cuadro comportamental basado en la teoría de la autodeterminación y que los gestores pueden llevar la práctica. La aplicación de l cuadro contribuye a la satisfacción de necesidades lo que, como avanza la teoría, aumenta la motivación autónoma, el bienestar y el rendimiento.
Palabras clave:
- Evaluación del rendimiento,
- retroacción,
- motivación,
- necesidades psicológicas fundamentales
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Algera, Jen A; Kleingeld, Ad; van Tuijl, Harrie (2002). « Enhancing performance through goal-setting and feedback intervention », dans S.Sonnentag (sous la direction de), Psychological Management of Individual Performance. Chichester, West Sussex, England : Wiley, p. 229-248.
- Alvero, M. Alicia; Bucklin, R. Barbara; Austin, John (2001). « An objective review of the effectiveness and essential characteristics of performance feedback in organisational settings (1985-1998) », Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, vol. 21, n° 1, p. 3-29.
- Arnolds, C. A; Boshoff, Christo (2002). « Compensation, esteem valence and job performance: an empirical assessment of Alderfer’s ERG theory », International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 13, n° 4, p. 697-719.
- Ashford, Susan, J. (1986). « Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective », The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 29, n° 3, p. 465-487.
- Ashford, Susan, J.; Cummings, Larry, L. (1983). « Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information », Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, vol. 32, n° 3, p. 370-398.
- Ashford, Susan, J.; Blatt, Ruth; VandeWalle, Don (2003). « Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behaviour in organizations », Journal of Management, vol. 29, n° 6, p. 773-799.
- Baard, Paul P. (2002). « Intrinsic need satisfaction in organizations: A motivational basis of success in for-profit and not-for-profit settings », dans E.L. Deci et R.M. Ryan, (sous la direction de), Handbook of self-determination research, Rochester NY : University of Rochester Press, chap. 12, p. 255-275.
- Baard, Paul, P.; Deci, Edward, L.; Ryan, Richard, M. (2004). « Intrinsic need satisfaction: a motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings », Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 34, n° 10, p. 2045-2068.
- Bandura, Albert (1997). Self-efficacy - The exercise of control. New York : W.H. Freeman and Company.
- Baumeister, Roy (1999). « The self », dans D. Gilbert, S. Fiske et G. Lindzey (sous la direction de), Handbook of social psychology, vol. 1, New-York, McGraw-Hill, p. 680-740.
- Blader, Steve L.; Tyler, Tom R. (2005). « How can theories of organizational justice explain the effects of fairness ? », Dans J. Greenberg et J.A. Colquitt (sous la direction de), Handbook of organizational justice, New Jersey, LEA, p. 329-354.
- Black, Aaron E.; Deci, Edward L. (2000). « The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective », Science Education, vol. 84, n° 4, p. 740-756.
- Button, Scott B.; Mathieu, John E. et Aikin, Kathryn J. (1996). « An examination of the relative impact of assigned goals and self-efficacy on personal goals and performance », Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 25, n°12, p. 1084-1103.
- Cawley, Brian C.; Keeping, Lisa M.; Levy, Paul E. (1998). « Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations », Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 83, n° 4, p. 615-633.
- Deci, Edward L.; Ryan, Richard M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, Plenum, University of Rochester, New York, 371 p.
- Deci, Edward L.; Connell, James P.; Ryan, Richard M. (1989). « Self-Determination in a Work Organization », Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 74, n° 4, p. 580-590.
- Deci, Edward L.; Koestner, Richard; Ryan, Richard M. (1999). « A meta-analytic review of experiements examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation », Psychological Bulletin, vol. 125, n° 6, p. 627-668.
- Deci, Edward L.; Ryan, Richard M. (2000). « The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior », Psychological Inquiry, vol. 11, n° 4, p. 227-268.
- Deci, Edward L.; Ryan, Richard M. (2008). « Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health », Canadian Psychology, vol. 49, n° 3, p. 182-185.
- DeNisi, Angelo S.; Pritchard, Robert D. (2006). « Performance appraisal, performance management and improving individual performance: A motivational framework », Management and Organization Review, vol. 2, n° 2, p. 253-277.
- De Waal, André A. (2003). « Behavioral factors important for the successful implementation and use of performance management systems », Management Decision, vol.41, n° 8, p. 688-697.
- Drewes, Gesa; Runde, Bernd (2002). « Performance appraisal », dans S.Sonnentag (sous la direction de), Psychological Management of Individual Performance. Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex, England, p. 137-154.
- Dweck, Carol S.; Leggett, Ellen L. (1988). « A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality », Psychological Review, vol. 95, n°2, p. 256-273.
- Elicker, Joelle D.; Levy, Paul E.; Hall, Rosalie J. (2006). « The role of leader-member exchange in the performance appraisal process », Journal of Management, vol. 32, n° 4, p. 531-551.
- Gagné, Marylène; Deci, Edward L. (2005). « Self-determination theory and work motivation », Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 26, p. 331-362.
- Gagné, Marylène; Donia, Magda; Bérubé, Nicole (2007). « Relationships between organizational justice and different motivational orientations », Acte de congrès. SIOP Congress, New York, USA.
- Gagné, Marylène; Forest, Jacques, (2008). « The study of compensation systems through the lens of Self-determination theory: Reconciling 35 years of debate », Canadian Psychology, vol. 49, n° 3, p. 225-232.
- Gagné, Marylène; Sénécal, Caroline; Koestner, Richard (1997). « Proximal job characteristics, feelings of empowerment, and intrinsic motivation: A multidimensional model », Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1222-1240.
- Gillet, Nicolas; Vallerand, Robert J.; Amoura, Sofiane; Baldes, Brice (2010). « Influence of coaches’ autonomy support on athletes’ motivation and sport performance: A test of the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation », Psychology of Sport and Exercise, vol. 11, p. 155-161.
- Grenier, Simon; Gilbert, Marie-Hélène; Savoie, André (2010). « La Justice Procédurale comme Variable Prévisionnelle de la Motivation Intrinsèque au Travail », Psychologie du travail et des organisations, vol. 16, n° 2, p. 126-142.
- Ilgen, Daniel R.; Fisher, Cynthia D.; Taylor, Susan (1979). « Consequences of individual feedback on behaviour in organizations », Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 64, n° 4, p. 349-371.
- Illies, Remus; Judge, Timothy A. (2005). « Goal regulation across time: the effects of feedback and affect », Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 90, n° 3, p. 453-467.
- Illies, Remus; Judge, Timothy A.; Wagner, David T. (2010). « The influence of cognitive and affective reaction to feedback on subsequent goals: role of behavioral inhibition/activation », European Psychologist, vol. 15, n°2, p. 121-131.
- Judge, Timothy A.; Kammeyer-Mueller, John D. (2011). « Happiness as a societal value », The Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 25, n°1, p. 30-41.
- Kluger, Avraham N.; DeNisi, Angelo (1996). « The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback interventions theory », Psychological Bulletin, vol. 119, n° 2, p. 254-284.
- Kuvaas, Bard (2006). « Performance appraisal satisfaction and employee outcomes: mediating and moderating roles of work motivation », International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 17, n° 3, p. 504-522.
- Langfred, Claus, W.; Moye, Neta, A (2004). « Effects of task autonomy on performance: An extended model considering motivational, informational and structural mechanisms », Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 89, n° 6, 934-945.
- Levy, Paul E.; Williams, Jane R. (2004). « The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future », Journal of Management, vol. 30, n° 6, p. 881-905.
- Locke, Edwin A.; Latham, Gary P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance, Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall, 540 p.
- Locke, Edwin A.; Latham, Gary P. (2002). « Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation », American Psychologist, vol. 57, n° 9, p. 705-717.
- Mageau, Geneviève A; Vallerand, Robert J. (2003). « The coach-athlete relationship: A motivational model », Journal of Sports Sciences, vol. 21, p. 883-904.
- Mohrman, Allan M.; Lawler, Edward E. (1983). « Motivation and Performance appraisal behavior », dans F. Landy, S. Zedeck et J. Cleveland (sous la direction de), Performance Measurement and theory, Hillsdale, New Jersey, Lea Publishers, p. 173-189.
- Morgeson, Frederick P.; Delaney-Klinger, Kelly; Hemingway, Monica A. (2005). « The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability, and job-related skill for predicting role breadth and job performance », Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 90, n° 2, p. 399-406.
- Rao, T. V. (2004). Performance Management and Appraisal Systems. New Delhi : Response Books – Sage, 330 p.
- Rhoades, Linda; Eisenberger, Robert (2002). « Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature », Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 87, n° 4, p. 698-714.
- Rhoades Shanock, Linda; Eisenberger, Robert (2006). « When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance », Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 91, n° 3, p. 689-695.
- Ryan, Richard M.; Deci, Edward L. (2000). « Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being », American Psychologist, vol. 55, n° 1, p. 68-78.
- Rynes, Sara L.; Gerhart, Barry; Minette, Kathleen A. (2004). « The importance of pay in employee motivation: Discrepancies between what people say and what they do », Human Resource Management, vol. 43, n° 4, p. 381-394.
- Sheldon, Kennon M. (2002). « The self-concordance model of healthy goal striving: when personal goals correctly represent the person », dans E. L. Deci et R. M. Ryan (sous la direction de), Handbook of Self-determination theory, New York, The University of Rochester Press, p. 65-86.
- Sheldon, Kennon, M.; Elliot, Andy J. (1998). « Not all personal goals are personal: comparing autonomous and controlled reasons as predictors of effort and attainment », Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 24, p. 546-557.
- Slocum, John W. (1971). « Motivation in managerial levels: relationship of need satisfaction to job performance », Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 55, n° 4, p. 312-316.
- Sparr, Jennifer L; Sonnentag, Sabine (2008). « Fairness perception of supervisor feedback, LMX, and employee well-being at work », European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, vol. 17, n° 2, p. 198-225.
- Steers, Richard M., Mowday, Richard T.; Shapiro, Debra L. (2004). « The future of work motivation theory », Academy of Management Review, vol. 29, n° 3, p. 379-387.
- St-Onge, Sylvie (1994). « Reconnaître la performance », Dans A. Gosselin et S. St-Onge (sous la direction de), Gérer la performance au travail : tendances et conditions de succès, Montréal, Collection Racines du Savoir, Revue gestion internationale, p. 264-284.
- Taylor, Ian M.; Ntoumanis, Nikos (2007). « Teacher motivational strategies and student self-determination », Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 99, n° 4, p. 747-760.
- Tyler, Tom R.; Lind, E. A. (1992). « A relational model of authority in groups », Advances in Experimental Psychology, vol. 25, p. 115-191.
- Van den Broeck, Anja; Vansteenkiste, Maarten; De Witte, Hans; Soenens, Bart; Lens, Willy (2010). « Capturing autonomy, compentence, and relatedness at work: construction and initial validations of the work-related basic need satisfaction scale », Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, vol. 83, p. 981-1002.
- VandeWalle, Don; Ganesan, Shankar; Challagalla, Goutam, N.; Brown, Steven (2000). « An integrated model of feedback-seeking behavior: Disposition, context, and cognition », Journal of Applie Psychology, vol. 85, n° 6, p. 996-1003.
- Vansteenkiste, Maarten; Simons, Joke; Lens, Willy; Sheldon, Kennon M.; Deci, Edward L. (2004). « Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: the synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts », Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 87, n° 2, p. 246-260.
- Zigon, Jack (2002). How to Measure Employee Performance, Media, PA : Zigon Performance Group, 178 p.