Résumés
Abstract
This paper demonstrates the impact of the participation of corporate venture capital (CVC) funds and independent venture capital (IVC) funds in syndicated investments. We examine the dynamics of the impact of these syndications and the channels (industry fit and location fit) that improve innovation effectiveness. Based on the main sample of 5182 US. funded companies between 1998 and 2017, there is strong evidence of an existing superiority of CVC engagement in syndications (CVC/IVC) that can further boost the innovation output contribution. Additionally, the results show that industry and location fit augment the innovation output of the entrepreneurial companies.
Keywords:
- Innovation,
- Independent Venture Capital,
- Corporate Venture Capital,
- Syndicates,
- Location Fit,
- Industry Fit
Résumé
Cet article démontre l’impact de la participation des fonds de capital-risque d'entreprise (CVC) et des fonds de capital-risque indépendants (IVC) dans les investissements syndiqués. Nous examinons la dynamique de l’impact de ces syndications et les canaux (ajustement industriel et ajustement géographique) qui améliorent l’efficacité de l’innovation. Basé sur l’échantillon un échantillon de 5182 entreprises américaines financées entre 1998 et 2017, nous démontrons une supériorité des engagements de CVC dans les syndications (CVC/IVC) qui peut encore stimuler la contribution à la production d'innovation. De plus, les résultats montrent que l’adéquation entre l’industrie et l’emplacement géographique augmente la production d’innovation des entreprises entrepreneuriales.
Mots-clés :
- innovation,
- capital-risque indépendant,
- capital-risque d'entreprise,
- syndication,
- adéquation géographique,
- adéquation sectorielle
Resumen
Este artículo demuestra el impacto de la participación de fondos de capital de riesgo corporativo (CVC) y fondos de capital de riesgo independiente (IVC) en inversiones sindicadas. Examinamos la dinámica del impacto de estas sindicaciones y los canales (ajuste industrial y Location fit and industry fit mechanisms ajuste geográfico) que mejoran la eficiencia de la innovación. Basado en la muestra principal compuesta por 5182 EE. UU. Empresas que fueron financiadas entre 1998 y 2017, existen pruebas fehacientes de la superioridad de la participación de los CVC en las sindicaciones (CVC/IVC), lo cual puede impulsar aún más la contribución a la producción de innovación. Además, los resultados muestran que la combinación industria-ubicación aumenta la producción de innovación de las empresas emprendedoras.
Palabras clave:
- innovación,
- capital riesgo independiente,
- capital riesgo corporativo,
- sindicatos,
- location fit,
- industry fit
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Alkhanbouli, A., Estay, C., Tsagdis, D., 2020. Modèles d’affaires et modèles d’affaires innovants au sein des zones franches: une approche qualitative. Manag. Int. Int. Manag. Gestiòn Int. 24, p. 97-108. https://doi.org/10.7202/1069097ar
- Alvarez-Garrido, E., Dushnitsky, G., 2016. Are entrepreneurial venture’s innovation rates sensitive to investor complementary assets? Comparing biotech ventures backed by corporate and independent VCs: Comparing Biotech Ventures Backed by Corporate and Independent VCs. Strateg. Manag. J. 37, p. 819-834. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2359
- Anokhin, S., Örtqvist, D., Thorgren, S., Wincent, J., 2011. Corporate Venturing Deal Syndication and Innovation: the Information Exchange Paradox. Long Range Plann. 44, p. 134-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.12.005
- Barney, J., 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. J. Manag. 17, p. 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
- Basu, S., Phelps, C., Kotha, S., 2011. Towards understanding who makes corporate venture capital investments and why. J. Bus. Ventur. 26, p. 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.001
- Bertoni, F., Colombo, M. G., Grilli, L., 2013. Venture capital investor type and the growth mode of new technology-based firms. Small Bus. Econ. 40, p. 527-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9385-9
- Block, Z., A. Ornati, O., 1987. Compensating corporate venture managers. J. Bus. Ventur. p. 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90018-8
- Block, Z., MacMillan, I. C., 1993. Corporate Venturing: Creating New Businesses Within the Firm. Harvard Business School Press.
- Brander, J.A., Amit, R., Antweiler, W., 2002. Venture-Capital Syndication: Improved Venture Selection vs. The Value-Added Hypothesis. J. Econ. Htmlent Glyphamp Asciiamp Manag. Strategy 11, p. 423-452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.2002.00423.x
- Braune, E., Lantz, J.-S., Sahut, J.-M., Teulon, F., 2019. Corporate venture capital in the IT sector and relationships in VC syndication networks. Small Bus. Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00264-4
- Catalini, C., 2018. Microgeography and the Direction of Inventive Activity. Manag. Sci. 64, p. 43484364. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2798
- Cefis, E., Marsili, O., Rigamonti, D., 2020. In and Out of Balance: Industry Relatedness, Learning Capabilities and Post-Acquisition Innovative Performance. J. Manag. Stud. 57, p. 210-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12441
- Chemmanur, T.J., Loutskina, E., Tian, X., 2014. Corporate Venture Capital, Value Creation, and Innovation. Rev. Financ. Stud. 27, p. 2434-2473. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu033
- Chesbrough, H. W., 2002. Making Sense of Corporate Venture Capital 10.
- Colombo, M. G., Murtinu, S., 2017. Venture Capital Investments in Europe and Portfolio Firms’ Economic Performance: Independent Versus Corporate Investors. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 26, p. 35-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12170
- Cumming, D., Dai, N., 2012. The Role of Geographic Proximity in Venture Capital. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195391596.013.0031
- Dai, N., Nahata, R., 2016. Cultural differences and cross-border venture capital syndication. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 47, 140-169. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2015.32
- Das, T. K., Teng, B.-S., 2000. A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances. J. Manag. 26, p. 31-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600105
- De Clercq, D., Dimov, D., 2004. Explaining venture capital firms’ syndication behaviour: A longitudinal study. Venture Cap. 6, 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369106042000277688
- DeCarolis, D.M., Deeds, D.L., 1999. The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strateg. Manag. J. 20, p. 953-968. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199910)20:10%3C953::AID-SMJ59%3E3.0.CO;2-3
- Dimov, D., Milanov, H., 2010. The interplay of need and opportunity in venture capital investment syndication. J. Bus. Ventur. 25, p. 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.002
- Dushnitsky, G., 2012. Corporate Venture Capital in the Twenty-First Century: an Integral Part of Firms’ Innovation Toolkit. Oxf. Handb. Venture Cap. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195391596.013.0006
- Dushnitsky, G., Shaver, M., 2009. Limitations to Inter-Organizational Knowledge Acquisition: The Paradox of Corporate Venture Capital (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1,402,951). Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.
- Eisenhardt, K. M., Schoonhoven, C. B., 1996. Resource-Based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms. Organ. Sci. 7, p. 136-150. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.2.136
- Espenlaub, S., Khurshed, A., Mohamed, A., 2012. IPO Survival in a Reputational Market. J. Bus. Finance Account. 39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2012.02280.x
- Ferrary, M., 2010. Syndication of Venture Capital Investment: The Art of Resource Pooling. Entrep. Theory Pract. 34, 885-907. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00356.x
- Fleming, L., King, C., Juda, A. I., 2007. Small Worlds and Regional Innovation. Organ. Sci. 18, p. 938954. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0289
- Friedman, Y., 2006. Science Business: The Promise, the Reality, and the Future of Biotech. By Gary P. Pisano. Biotechnol. J. 1, p. 1474-1474. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.200690142
- Fulghieri, P., Sevilir, M., 2009. Organization and Financing of Innovation, and the Choice between Corporate and Independent Venture Capital. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 44, p. 1291-1321. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109009990391
- Gompers, Lerner, J. (Eds.), 2000. The Determinants of Corporate Venture Capital Success Organizational Structure, Incentives, and Complementarities, A National Bureau of Economic Research conference report. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. https://doi.org/10.3386/w6725
- Gompers, P., Kovner, A., Lerner, J., 2009. Specialization and Success: Evidence from Venture Capital. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 18, p. 817-844. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00230.x
- Griliches, Z., 1990. Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey (Working Paper No. 3301). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3301
- Guo, B., Lou, Y., Pérez-Castrillo, D., 2015. Investment, Duration, and Exit Strategies for Corporate and Independent Venture Capital-Backed Start-Ups: Investment, Duration, and Exit Strategies. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 24, p. 415-455. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12097
- Howell, A., 2020. Industry relatedness, FDI liberalization and the indigenous innovation process in China. Reg. Stud. 54, p. 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1623871
- Jääskeläinen, M., 2012. Venture Capital Syndication: Synthesis and future directions. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 14, p. 444-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00325.x
- Keil, T., Maula, M.V.J., Wilson, C., 2010. Unique Resources of Corporate Venture Capitalists as a Key to Entry Into Rigid Venture Capital Syndication Networks. Entrep. Theory Pract. 34, p. 83-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00366.x
- Lerner, J., 2012. The Architecture of Innovation.
- Ma, S., 2020. The Life Cycle of Corporate Venture Capital. Rev. Financ. Stud. 33, p. 358-394. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz042
- Manigart, S., Lockett, A., Meuleman, M., Wright, M., Landström, H., Bruining, H., Desbrières, P., Hommel, U., 2006. Venture Capitalists’ & Decision to Syndicate. Entrep. THEORY Pract. 23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00115.
- Maula, M., Autio, E., Murray, G., 2005. Corporate Venture Capitalists and Independent Venture Capitalists: What do they know, Who do They Know and Should Entrepreneurs Care? Venture Cap. 7, p. 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369106042000316332
- Nahata, R., 2004. The Determinants of Venture Capital Exits: An Empirical Analysis of VC-backed Portfolio Companies. Vanderbilt Univ.
- Polanyi, M., 1967. The tacit dimension. Anchor Books, Garden City, N.Y.
- Rosen, R.J., 2006. Merger Momentum and Investor Sentiment: The Stock Market Reaction to Merger Announcements. J. Bus. 79, p. 987-1017. https://doi.org/10.1086/499146
- Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B., 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70, p. 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
- Rumelt, 1984. Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm. Competitive Strategic Management.
- Sapienza, H. J., 1992. When do venture capitalists add value? J. Bus. Ventur. 7, p. 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(92)90032-M
- Shuwaikh, F., Dubocage, E., 2022. Access to the Corporate Investors’ Complementary Resources: A Leverage for Innovation in Biotech Venture Capital-Backed Companies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 175, 121,374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121374
- Silverman, B. S., 1999. Technological Resources and the Direction of Corporate Diversification: Toward an Integration of the Resource-Based View and Transaction Cost Economics. Manag. Sci. 45, p. 1109-1124. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.8.1109
- Sorenson, O., Stuart, T. E., 2001. Syndication Networks and the Spatial Distribution of Venture Capital Investments. Am. J. Sociol. 106, p. 1546-1588. https://doi.org/10.1086/321301
- Stein, J., 1997. Internal Capital Markets and the Competition for Corporate Resources. J. Finance LII, p. 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03810.x
- Tian, X., 2012. The Role of Venture Capital Syndication in Value Creation for Entrepreneurial Firms*. Rev. Finance 16, p. 245-283. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfr019
- Tian, X., Kou, G., Zhang, W., 2020. Geographic distance, venture capital and technological performance: Evidence from Chinese enterprises. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 158, p. 120,155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120155
- Wadhwa, A., Phelps, C., Kotha, S., 2016. Corporate venture capital portfolios and firm innovation. J. Bus. Ventur. 31, p. 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.04.006
- Wallmeroth, J., Wirtz, P., Groh, A. P., 2018. Venture Capital, Angel Financing, and Crowdfunding of Entrepreneurial Ventures: A Literature Review. Found. TrendsR Entrep. 14, p. 1-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/0300000066
- Wernerfelt, B., 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 5, p. 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
- Wright, M., Lockett, A., 2003. The Structure and Management of Alliances: Syndication in the Venture Capital Industry (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 467,754). Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00412.x
- Zhang, L., Guo, Y., Sun, G., 2019. How patent signals affect venture capital: The evidence of bio-pharmaceutical start-ups in China. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 145, p. 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.013