Résumés
Abstract
The rise of new social movements has produced an emerging discourse on activist scholarship. There is considerable ambiguity about what the term means. In this article I draw on my work as a trade unionist, political activist, and activist lawyer in Mumbai, and later as a social justice activist in New Zealand to reflect on the meaning of activist scholarship, interrogate the institutional contexts for knowledge, and the relationship of knowledge to emancipatory structural social transformations. Although based on personal experiences, this article provides a theoretically oriented meta-analysis of activist scholarship.
Résumé
La montée des nouveaux mouvements sociaux a provoqué l’émergence d’un discours novateur sur l’activisme étudiant. Il persiste cependant une grande ambiguïté quand à la signification de ce terme. Dans cet article, je m’inspire de mes travaux comme militante syndicale, activiste politique et avocate engagée à Mumbai, ainsi que de mon expérience en tant que activiste en justice sociale en Nouvelle-Zélande pour réfléchir sur le sens à donner à l’activisme étudiant, m’interroger sur les contextes institutionnels du savoir, et sur la relation existant entre le savoir et les transformations structurelles d’émancipation. Bien que prenant appui sur mes expériences personnelles, cet article étaye une méta-analyse théorique de l’activisme étudiant.
Parties annexes
References
- Banerjee, S. (1984). India’s simmering revolution: The Naxalite uprising. London: Zed Books.
- Bannerjee, S. (1980). In the wake of Naxalbari. Calcutta: Subernarekha.
- Bhagwati, J. P. N. (1985). Law Day speech by the chief justice of the Supreme Court of India. Supreme Court Cases, 1, 1.
- Bhagwati, J. P. N. (1986). Law Day speech by the chief justice of the Supreme Court of India. Supreme Court Cases, 1, 46.
- Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. London: Verso.
- Ci, J. (1999). Justice, freedom, and the moral bounds of capitalism. Social Theory and Practice, 25(3), 409-438.
- D’Souza, R. (2004). Carnivals in the era of “globalisation.” Retrieved February 07, 2004 from http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2004-02/07d’souza_.cfm
- Ghosh, S. (1974). The Naxalite movement: A Maoist experiment. Calcutta: Firma K.L Mukhopadhyay.
- Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Holloway, J. (2002). Change the world without taking power. London, Sterling; Virgina: Pluto Press.
- Jordan, S. (2003). Who stole my methodology? Co-opting PAR. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1(2), 185-200.
- Kothari, R. (1988). Rethinking development: In search of humane alternatives. Delhi: Ajanta.
- Passavant, P. A., & Dean, J. (Eds.). (2004). Empire’s new clothes: Reading Hardt and Negri. New York: London: Routledge.
- Shah Commission. (1978). Shah Commission of Inquiry interim report I & II. Delhi: Government of India.
- Tambiah, S. J. (1990). Magic, science, religion, and the scope of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wallerstein, I. (2002). New revolts against the system. New Left Review, Second Series 18, 29-39.
- Zizek, S. (2001). Did somebody say totalitarianism? Five interventions in the (mis)use of a notion. London New York: Verso.
- Zizek, S. (2002a). A plea for Leninist intolerance. Critical Inquiry, 28 (Winter), 542-566.
- Zizek, S. (Ed.). (2002b). Revolution at the gates: A selection of writings from February to October 1917: V. I. Lenin. (Foreword and afterword by Slavoj Zizek). London : New York: Verso.