Résumés
Abstract
This paper discusses my position as an Arab Muslim woman researcher who is affiliated with a Western university, researching Arab Muslim Canadian women. I discuss how reflexivity has emerged as an element of my research endeavours. Various notions of reflexivity in educational research have been expressed in the literature, yet I focus on what it means to me as an insider-outsider researcher and how it characterizes my research endeavours. In this paper, I explore the complexity of occupying these multiple subjectivities.
Résumé
Cet article explore ma position comme chercheure musulmane arabe affiliée à une université occidentale étudiant la vie des femmes canadiennes musulmanes arabes. J’y examine de quelle manière la réflexivité a émergé comme élément de mes projets de recherche. Bien que diverses notions de réflexivité aient été soulevées dans la littérature, je cible ce que cela signifie pour moi en tant que chercheure initiée et observatrice ainsi que de quelle manière cela teinte mes recherches. J’y analyse la complexité d’incarner ces multiples subjectivités.
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire. Télécharger
Parties annexes
Notes biographiques
AMANI HAMDAN is an adjunct professor at the University of Ottawa. She received the first Canadian Society for the Study of Women in Education (CASWE) award for her PhD dissertation (University of Western Ontario, 2006). Her dissertation was published in 2009 under the title Muslim women speak: A tapestry of lives and dreams (Toronto: Women’s Press).
AMANI HAMDAN est professeure adjoint à l’Université d’Ottawa. Elle a reçu le premier prix de l’Association canadienne pour l’étude sur les femmes et l’éducation (ACÉFÉ) pour sa thèse de doctorat (Université Western Ontario, 2006). Ce travail de recherche a été publié en 2009 sous le titre Muslim women speak: A tapestry of lives and dreams à la maison d’édition torontoise Women’s Press.
References
- Abdo, D. (2002). Uncovering the harem in the classroom. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 30(1/2), 227-238.
- Abu-Lughod, L. (Ed.). (1998). Remaking women: Feminism and modernity in the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Abu-Lughod, L. (1990). Can there be a feminist ethnogrpahy? Women and Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory, 5(1), 7-27.
- Atkinson, R. (1998). The life story interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Berger, P. (1963). Invitation to sociology. Garden city, NY: Doubly.
- Bjorklund, K., & Olsson, A. (2005). Glass ceiling for women in academia. Retrieved April, 4, 2005, from http://web.bk.tudelft.nl/b-nieuws/forum/1.html
- Brown, L., Tappan, M., Gilligan, C., Miller, B., & Argyris, D. (1989). Reading for self and moral voice: A method for interpreting narratives of real-life, moral conflict and choice. In M. Packer & R. Addison (Eds.), Entering the circle: Hermeneutic investigation in psychology (pp. 141-164). Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Chaudhry, L. (1997). Researching “my people,” researching myself: Fragments of reflexive tale. Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(4), 441-453.
- Chaudhry, L. (2000). Researching “my people,” researching myself: fragments of a reflexive tale. In W. Pillow (Ed.), Working the ruins: Feminist post-structural research and practice in education (pp. 96–113). New York: Routledge.
- DeLuca, S. (1996). Uncovering the passion: the reclaiming of self in the teaching lives of nurse educators. Unpublished M.A., University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.
- Douglas, J. (1976). Investigative social research: Individual and team field research (Vol. 29). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
- El Saadawi, N. (1999). A daughter of Isis: The autobiography of Nawal El Saadawi (S. Hetata, Trans.). London, New York: Zed Books.
- El-Solh, C. (1988). Gender, class and origin: Aspects of role during fieldwork in Arab society. In S. Altorki & C. El-Solh (Eds.), Arab women in the field: studying your own society. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
- Gadamer, H. (1975). Truth and method (G. Barden, Cumming, J., Trans.). New York: Seabury Press.
- Ghazalla, I., & Sabagh, G. (1986). Arab sociology today: A View from within. Annual Reviews, 12, 373-399.
- Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261-280.
- Hamnett, M., Porter, D., Singh, A., & Kumar, K. (Eds.). (1984). Ethics, politics, and international social science research. Honolulu: University Hawaii Press.
- Harding, S. (1991). “Strong objectivity” and socially situated knowledge. In S. Harding (Ed.), Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking for women’s lives (pp. 138-163). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Hertz, R. (Ed.). (1997). Reflexivity and voice. London: Sage.
- Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Shapira, T. (2005). Muslim women’s life stories: Building leadership. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36(2), 165.
- Hessini, L. (1994). Wearing the hijab in contemporary Morocco: choice and identity. In F. Göçek & S. Balaghi (Eds.), Reconstructing gender in the Middle East: Tradition, identity, and power (pp. 40-56). New York: Columbia University Press.
- Hirschmann, N. (1998). Western feminism, Eastern veiling, and the question of free agency. Constellations, 5(3), 345-368.
- hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory from margin to center. Boston, MA: South End Press.
- Hurd, T. (1998). Process, content, and feminist reflexivity: One Researcher’s Exploration. Journal of Adult Development, 5(3), 195-203.
- Jansen, W. (1998). Contested identities: Women and religion In Algeria and Jordan. In K. Ask & M. Tjomsland (Eds.), Women and Islamization. Oxford: Berg.
- Jawad, H. (1998). The rights of women In Islam: An authentic approach. London: Macmillan .
- Lather, P. (1991a). Feminist research in education: Within/against. Geelong, Vic: Deakin University.
- Lather, P. (1991b). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York & London: Routledge.
- Lather, P. (1996). Troubling clarity: The politics of accessible language. Harvard Educational Review, 66(3), 525–545.
- Leistyna, P. (2004). Presence of mind in the process of learning and knowing: A dialogue with Paulo Freire. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(1), 17.
- Lieblich, A. (1996). Some unforeseen outcomes of conducting narrative research with people of one’s own culture. In A. Lieblich & R. Jossleson (Eds.), Narrative study of lives. Thousands Oak, CA: Sage.
- Luttrel, W. (2000). “Good enough” methods for ethnographic research. Harvard Educational Review, 70(4), 499-523.
- Lynch, M. (2000). Against reflexivity as an academic virtue source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(3), 26-54.
- Mathner, N., & Doucet, A. (1997). Reflections on a voice-centered relational method: Analysing maternal and domestic voices. In R. J. & R. Edwards (Eds.), Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research: Public knowledge and private lives. (pp. 119-146). London: Sage.
- McGraw, L., Zvonkovic, A., & Walker, M. (2000). Studying postmodern families: A feminist analysis of ethical tensions in work and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(1), 68-77.
- Mehdid, M. (1993). the Western invention of Arab womenhood: the ‘oriental’ female. In H. Afshar (Ed.), Women in the Middle East : perceptions, realities, and struggles for liberation. New York: Macmillan.
- Merryfield, M. (2001a). Moving the center of global education: From imperial world views that divide the world to double consciousness, contrapuntal pedagogy, hybridity and cross-cultural competence. In W. Stanley (Ed.), Critical issues in social studies research for the 21st century. Greenwich, CT: Information publication.
- Merryfield, M. (2001b). Re-evaluating global education: Opinions from the field. Issues in Global Education., Dec, 2001, from http://www.globaled.org
- Merryfield, M., & Subedi, E. (2000). Decolonising the mind of world-centred global education. In W. Ross (Ed.), Curriculum considerations in social studies. New York: State University of New York Press.
- Mishler, E. (1979). Meaning in the context: Is there any other kind? Harvard Educational Review, 53, 125-145.
- Moghissi, H. (1999). Away from home: Iranian women, displacement cultural resistance and change. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 30, 207-217.
- Morawski, J. G. (1994). Practicing feminism, reconstructing psychology: Notes on a liminal science. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
- Naples, N. (2003). Feminism and method: Ethnography, discourse analysis, and activist research. New York; London: Routledge.
- Nixon, J., Walker, M., & Clough, P. (2003). Research as thoughtful practice. In P. Sikes, J. Nixon & W. Carr (Eds.), The moral foundations of educational research: Knowledge, inquiry, and values. Buckingham, England & Philadelphia: Open University Press.
- Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175-196.
- Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist method in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Ribbens, J. (1998). Hearing my Feeling Voice? An Autobiographical Discussion of Motherhood. In J. Ribbens & R. Edwards (Eds.), Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research: public knowledge and private lives (pp. 24-38). London: Sage.
- Robertson, C., & James, S. (2002). Genital cutting and transnational sisterhood: Disputing U. S. polemics. Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
- Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative Analysis (Vol. 30). London: SAGE Publication.
- Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
- Said, E. (1993). Culture and Imperialism. New York: Alfred A Knopf.
- Said, E. (2000). Reflections on exile and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Sandelowski, M. (1987). the problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 27-37.
- Shami, S. (1988). Studying Your Own: the Complexities of a Shared Culture. In S. Altorki & C. El-Solh (Eds.), Arab Women in the Field: Studying your own Society. Syracuse, N.Y: Syracuse University Press.
- Slack, A. (1988). Female circumcision: A critical appraisal. Human Rights Quarterly, 10(4), 437-486.
- Smith, D. (1987). The Everyday World as problematic: A feminist Sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
- Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
- Stone, P. (1962). Appearance and the self. In A. Rose (Ed.), Human behaviours social processes: An Interactionist approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
- Subedi, B. (2006). Theorizing a ‘halfie’ researcher’s identity in transnational fieldwork. International Journal of Qualita tive Studies in Education, 19(5), 573–593.
- Tohidi, N. (1998). The issues at hand. In H. Bodman & N. Tohidi (Eds.), Women in Muslim societies: Diversity within unity (pp. 277-294). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
- Usher, R. (1996). Textuality and reflexivity in educational research. In R. Usher & D. Scott (Eds.), Understanding educational research (pp. 52-73). London: Routledge.
- Villenas, S. (2000). This ethnography called my back: Writings of the exotic gaze, “othering” Latina, and recuperating Xicanisma. In W. Pillow (Ed.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural research and practice in education. (pp. 74–95). New York: Routledge.
- Wadud, A. (1999). Qur’an and Woman; Re-Reading the Sacred Text from a Woman’s Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Wasserfall, L. (1997). Reflexivity, feminism, and differences. In R. Hertz (Ed.), Reflexivity and voice, (pp. 150-168). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Zine, J. (2003). Staying on the ‘Straight Path’: A Critical Ethnography of Islamic Schooling in Ontario. Unpublished PhD, University of Toronto, Toronto.