Résumés
Abstract
Aiming to extend sociocultural theory about the teaching and learning of literacies, this article reports on data from a qualitative study underpinned by a sociocultural framework (Rogoff, 1990; Vygotsky, 1986). Conducted in an Australian university community, the project tracked a group of pre-service teachers engaging in scaffolded literacy events, such as face-to-face and on-line discussions and shared reading experiences with children. Highlighting the importance of examining the teaching and learning of literacies across formal and informal settings, results offer information about how these pre-service teachers constructed understandings and situated identities (Gee, 1990, 2000-2001) through scaffolding. Pedagogical implications for pre-service teacher education are discussed.
Résumé
L’objectif de cet article est d’élargir la portée de la théorie socioculturelle de l’enseignement et de l’apprentissage de la littératie. Il fait le compte-rendu des données tirées d’une étude qualitative étayée dans un cadre socioculturel (Rogoff, 1990; Vygotsky, 1986). Pilotée par une communauté universitaire d’Australie, ce projet a suivi un groupe de futurs enseignants participant à des événements de soutien à l’apprentissage de la littératie, telles que des discussions face à face et en ligne ainsi que des expériences de lecture partagée avec des enfants. Soulignant l’importance d’analyser l’enseignement et l’apprentissage de la littératie dans des contextes formels et informels, les résultats présentent des informations sur la manière dont les futurs enseignants élaborent leur compréhension et situent leur identité professionnelle (Gee, 1990, 2000-2001) à l’aide du soutien à l’apprentissage. Les implications pédagogiques pour la formation des futurs enseignants sont exposées.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Ajayi, L. (2009). An exploration of pre-service teachers’ perceptions of learning to teach while using asynchronous discussion board. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 86-100.
- Albright, J. (2006). Literacy education after Bourdieu. The American Journal of Semiotics. 22(1-4), 109 -132.
- Albright, L. (2002). Bringing the Ice Maiden to life: Engaging adolescents in learning through picture book read-alouds in contents areas. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 45(5), 418– 429
- Allington, R. (2006). What really matters for struggling readers. Designing research-based programs. (2nd ed). New York, NY: Allyn & Unwin
- Anstey, M., & Bull, G. (2004). The literacy labyrinth (2nd ed). French’s Forest, AU: Pearson Education.
- Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (2012). The shape of the Australian curriculum. Version 3. Retreived from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/The_Shape_of_the_Australian_Curriculum_V3.pdf
- Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (M. Holquist Ed., V.W. McGee Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
- Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (E. Emerson, & M. Holquist Eds., V. McGee Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
- Barnett, M. (2006). Using a web-based professional development system to support pre-service teachers in examining authentic classroom practice. Journal of Technology and TeacherEducation,14(4), 701- 728.
- Barr, R. Watts-Taffe, S., Yokota, J., Ventura, M. & Caputi, V. (2000). Preparing teachers to teach literacy: Re-thinking pre-service literacy education. Journal of Literacy Research, 32, 463- 470.
- Black, A. (2005). The use of asynchronous discussion: Creating a text of talk. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(1), 1 -15.
- Bourdieu, P. (1990). Language and symbolic power (J. Thompson Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
- Britzman, D. (1991). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning how to teach. Albany, NY: SUNY.
- Brown, A. L. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. American Psychologist, 52(4), 399-413.
- Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. New York, NY: Norton.
- Chambers Cantrell, S. (2002). Promoting talk: A framework for reading discussions in teacher education courses. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(7), 642-652.
- Cho, C., & Taylor, L. (2012). Re/mediating social justice education: Using on-line digital Aaimation Sotware to foster pre-service student engagement with equity issues. In S. Van Nuland, & J. Greenlaw (Eds.), Social media: teacher learning. (pp. 25-36). Oshawa, ON: University of Ontario Institute of Technology
- Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). The new teacher education: For better or worse? Educational Researcher, 34(7), 3-18.
- Comber, B. (2003). Literacy interrupted: ADHD, absence and mobility. In. B. Comber & J. Barnett (Eds.), Look again. Longitudinal studies of children’s literacy learning (pp 21-33). Newtown, AU: PETA
- Commonwealth of Australia (2005). Department of Education , Science and Training). Teaching reading. Report from National Literacy Inquiry Committee. Canberra,
- Commmonwealth of Australia (2007). Top of the class: Report on the inquiry into teacher education. Retreived 3/1/13 from Parliament, House of Representatives, Standing Committee on Education and Vocational Training http://www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/evt/teachereduc/report.htmwww.appa
- Cooper, K., & Olson, M. (1996). The multiple “Is” of teacher identity. In M. Kompf, D. Dworet & R. Boark (Eds.), Changing research and practice (pp. 78-89). London, UK: Falmer Press.
- Courtney, A. M., & King, F. B. (2009). Online dialogue discussion: A tool to support pre-service teacher candidates’ understanding of literacy teaching and practice. Contemporary Issues in Technologyand Teacher Education [On-line serial], 9(3), 226-256.
- Cumming-Potvin, W. (2009) Social justice, pedagogy and multiliteracies: Developing communities of practice for teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 34(1), 82-99.
- Cumming Potvin, W. (2012). Critical engagement with literacy and qualitative research: Toward socially just pedagogy in the teacher education classroom. In B. Down, & J. Smyth (Eds.), Critical voices in teacher education: Teaching for social justice in conservative times (pp. 197-209). New York, NY: Springer.
- Cumming-Potvin, W., Renshaw, P., & Van Kraayenoord, C. (2003). Scaffolding and bilingual shared reading experiences: Promoting primary school students’ learning and development. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(2), 54-68.
- Davidson-Shivers, G., Tanner, E., & Muilenburg, L. (2000). On-line discussion: How do students participate? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Retreived from ERIC database (ED443410).
- Day, C., Kington, A., Stobart, G., & Sammons, P. (2006). The personal and professional selves of teachers: Stable and unstable identities. British Educational Research Journal, 32(4), 601-616.
- Deacon, A. (2003). Beegu. London, UK: Random House.
- Dean, D., & Grierson, S. (2005). Re-envisioning reading and writing through combined-text picture books. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(6), 456 -469.
- Durrant, C. (2006). Connecting without bitterness (Foreword). In B. Doecke, M. Howie, & W. Sawyer (Eds.), Only connect: English teaching, school and community (pp.vii-ix). Kensington Gardens, AU: The Australian Association for the Teaching of English.
- Durrant, C. (2012). Whispering to the hippopotamus about the ‘Literacy Boomerang:’ Literacy wars and rumours of wars. In B. Down, & J. Smyth (Eds.), Critical voices in teacher education. Teaching for social justice in conservative times (pp 185-195). New York, NY: Springer.
- Dysthe, O., Samara, A., & Westrheim, K. (2006). Multivoiced supervision of master’s students: A case study of alternative supervision practices in higher education. Studies in Higher Education,31(3), 299-318
- Flores, M. (2007). Navigating contradictory communities of practice in learning to teach for social justice. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 38(4), 380-404.
- Franzak, J. (2002). Developing a teacher identity: The impact of critical friends practice on the student teacher. English Education. Urbana, 34(4), 258-281.
- Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Gee, J. (1990) Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourse. New York, NY: Falmer Press.
- Gee, J. (1999). An Introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London, UK: Routledge.
- Gee, J. (2000-2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education. 25, 99-125.
- Gee, J. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Gillham, B. (2000). Case study research methods. London, UK: Continuum.
- Graham, B. (2001). Let’s Get a Pup. London, UK: Blackbird Design Pty.
- Greenbank, P. (2003). The role of values in educational research: The case for reflexivity. British Educational Research Journal,29(6), 791-801.
- Grisham, D.L. (2000). Reader response in graduate school: Veteran teachers’ experiences with LRCs. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, retrieved 3/1/11 from http://www.aare.edu.au/02pap/woo02113.htm.
- Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942-1012.
- Groundwater-Smith, S. (2005). Work Matters: The Professional Learning Portfolio? Retreived from Department of Education and Training, New South Wales http://www.schools.nsw.edu.au/edu_leadership/prof_read/portfolios/smith.php
- Groundwater-Smith, S., & Nias, J. (Eds.). (1988). The enquiring teacher: Supporting and sustaining teacher research. London, UK: Falmer Press
- Guk, I., & Kellogg, D. (2007). The ZPD and whole class teaching: Teacher-led and student-led interactional mediation of tasks, Language Teaching Research, 11(3), 281-300.
- Hatano, G., & Wertsch, J. (2001). Sociocultural approaches to cognitive development: The constitutions of culture in mind. Human Development, 44(2-3), 77-83.
- Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher re-education: Toward definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 33-49.
- Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Ivanic, R., Edwards, R., Satchwell, C., & Smith, J. (2007). Possibilities for pedagogy in further education: Harnessing the abundance of literacy. British Educational Research Journal, 33(5), 703-721.
- Jetton, T. (2004). Using computer-mediated discussion to facilitate pre-service teachers’ understanding of literacy assessment and instruction. Journal of Research on Technology inEducation. Eurgene, 36(2), 171-191.
- Kasworm, C. (2003). Adult meaning making in the undergraduate classroom. Adult Education Quarterly, 53, 81-98.
- Knowles, J., & Holt-Reynolds, D. (1991). Shaping pedagogies through personal histories in pre-service teacher education. Teachers College Record, 93(1), 87-113.
- Kooy, M., & de Freitas, E. (2007). The diaspora sensibility in teacher identity: Locating self through story. Canadian Journal of Education 30(3), 865-880.
- Lapadat, J. (2000). Teaching on-line: Breaking new ground in collaborative thinking. Paper presented at the 28thAnnual conference of the Canadian Society of the Study of Education Congress of the Social Sciences and Humanities, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED443420).
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Levin, B., He, Y., & Robbins, H. (2006). Comparative analysis of pre-service teachers’ reflective thinking in synchronous versus asynchronous on-line case discussions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 439- 461.
- Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1999). A map of possible practices: Further notes on the resources model. Practically primary, 4(2), 5-9.
- Lupton, D. (1992). Discourse analysis: A new methodology for understanding the ideologies of health and illness, Australian Journal of Public Health, 16(2), 145-150.
- Lutz, S., Guthrie, J., & Davis, M. (2006). Scaffolding for engagement in elementary school reading instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 100(1), 3-20.
- Lytle, S., & Cochran-Smith, M. (1992). Teacher research as a way of knowing. Harvard Educational Review, 62(4), 447-475.
- MaKinster, G., Barab, S., Harwood, W., & Anderson, H. (2006). The effect of social context on the reflective practice of pre-service science teachers: Incorporating a web-supported community of teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 543-579.
- Maloch, B., Seely Flint, A., Eldrige, D., Harmon, J., Loven, R., Fine, J., Bryant-Shanklin, M. & Martinez, M. (2003). Understandings, Beliefs, and Reported Decision Making of First-Year Teachers from Different Reading Teacher Preparation Programs. The Elementary School Journal, 103 (5), 431-444.
- Martino, W. (1999). ‘Cool boys’, ‘party animals’, ‘squids’ and ‘poofters’: Interrogating the dynamics and politics of adolescent masculinities in school. British Journal of Sociologyof Education, 20(2), 239-264.
- Martino, W., & Pallotta-Chiarolli, M. (2003) So what’s a boy? Addressing issues of masculinity and schooling. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
- Martino, W. & Cumming-Potvin, W. (2011). “They didn’t have out there gay parents — they just looked like normal regular parents:” Investigating teachers’ approaches to addressing same-sex parenting and non-normative sexuality in the elementary school classroom. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(4), 480-500.
- Mitchell, J. Murray, S., & Nuttall, J. (2006). Teacher education. What are its prospects? In B. Doecke, M. Howie, & W. Sawyer (Eds.), Only connect: English teaching, schooling and community (pp. 321-334). Kent Town, AU: Wakefield Press.
- Munsch, R. (1986). Love You Forever. London, UK: Random House.
- New London Group (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In B. Cope, & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of socialfutures (pp. 9-39). Youth Yarra, AU: MacMillan.
- Nicholson, S., & Bond, A. (2003). Collaborative reflection and professional community building: An analysis of pre-service teachers’ use of an electronic discussion board. Journal ofTechnology and Teacher Education, 11(2), 259- 280.
- Noor, K. B. M. (2008). Case Study: A Strategic Research Methodology. AmericanJournal of Applied Sciences, 5(11), 1602-1604.
- Norton, A. (2012). Mapping Australian Higher Education. Melbourne, AU: Gratton Institute.
- O’Brien, J. (2001). Children reading critically: A local history. In B. Comber, & A. Simpson (Eds.), Negotiating critical literacies in classrooms (pp. 37-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Paris, S., & Cross, D. (1988). The zone of proximal development: Virtues and pitfalls of a metaphorical representation of children’s learning. The Genetic Epistemologist, XVI(1), 27-38.
- Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Pearson, P. (2001). Learning to teach reading: The status of the knowledge base. In C. Roller (Ed.), Learning to teach reading: Setting the research agenda (pp. 4-19). Newark, NJ: International Reading Association.
- Pentimonti, J., & Justice, L. (2010). Teachers’ use of scaffolding strategies during read alouds in the preschool classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal,37, 241–248.
- Ranker, J. (2009). Learning nonfiction in an ESL class: The interaction of situated practices and teacher scaffolding in a genre study. A first-grade teacher ESL teacher used a complex combination of both expert guidance and collaborative experiences when exploring nonfiction in her class. The Reading Teacher, 62(7), 580- 589.
- Reisberg, R., Brander, B. & Gruenewald, D. (2006). Your place or mine? Reading art, place and culture in multicultural picture books. Teaching Education Quarterly, Winter, 117-133.
- Rogers, T., Marshall, E., & Tyson, C. (2006). Dialogic narratives of literacy, teaching, and schooling: Preparing literacy teachers for diverse settings. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(2), 202-224.
- Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
- Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Sleeter, C., Torres, M., & Laughlin, P. (2004). Scaffolding conscientization through inquiry in teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, Winter, 1-14.
- Smagorinsky, P. (2008). The method section as conceptual epicentre in constructing social science reports. Written Communication,25(3), 389-411.
- Smith, E. (2003). Failing boys and moral panics: Perspectives on the underachievement debate. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(3), 282-295.
- Smith, E. (2007). Raising standards in american schools: Problems with improving yeacher quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 610-622.
- Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1988). Understanding and conducting qualitative research. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing.
- Stone, C. A. (1993). What is missing in the metaphor of scaffolding? In E. Forman, N. Minick, & C. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 169-183). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Strong-Wilson, T. (2007). Moving horizons: Exploring the role of stories in decolonizing the literacy education of White teachers. International Education, 37(1), 114-131.
- Tama, C., & Peterson, K. (1991). Reflectivity through literature. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 22-28.
- Thomas, L., & Beauchamp, C. (2011). Understanding new teachers’ professional identities through metaphor. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 762-769.
- Tierney, R. (2006). Global/cultural teachers: Creating possibilities. Reading worlds, reading selves and learning to teach. Pedagogies: An International Journal. 1(1), 77-87.
- Tsui, A. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Verity, D. (2005). Vygotskyan Concepts for Teacher Education. In (Eds) P. Ross, T. Newfields, Y. Ishida, M. Chapman, K. & M. Kawate-Mierzejewska Proceedings of the 4thAnnual Conference on Lifelong Learning JALT Pan: SIG, Tokyo Keizai University, Tokyo, Japan (pp. 1-9).
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Walter, M. (2010). The nature of social science research. In. M. Walter (Ed.) Social Research Methods (pp 3-30). South Melbourne, AU: Oxford University Press.
- Wells, G. (1990). Studying literature study groups in the university classroom. In N.D. Padak (Ed.), Challenges in reading:The 12thyearbook of the College Reading Association (pp.132- 140). Coral Gables, FL: College Reading.
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Whipp, J. (2003). Scaffolding critical reflection in on-line discussions: Helping prospective teachers think deeply about field experiences in urban schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 321-334.
- Williams, N., & Owens, R. (1997). Benefits of using literature discussion groups in teacher education courses. Education. Chula Vista, 117(3), 415-420.
- Wittgenstein, L. (1974). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
- Wood, D., Bruner, J. & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
- Yee, W.C. & Andrews, J. (2006). Professional researcher or a ‘good guest’? Ethical dilemmas involved in researching children and families in the home setting. Educational Review 58(4), 397–413.
- Yin, R., (1989). Case study research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.