Résumés
Abstract
These “Notes from the Field” describe one doctoral student’s public visual fieldnotes practice during her data collection for her dissertation. In the creation of a public digital space for participants and the public to engage with the fieldnotes through online comments and in-person conversations, this shifts the practice of keeping the researcher’s initial thoughts private and separate from the research participants. In an attempt to address a critique of her own Master’s work, and the potentially exclusionary practice of private fieldnotes writing in participatory research, the piece raises questions about positionality and ethical concerns in relation to a digital archive of public visual fieldnotes as reflexive ethnographic practice.
Résumé
Ce texte décrit la démarche de diffusion publique de notes de terrain visuelles par une étudiante au doctorat au cours de l’étape de collecte de données pour sa thèse. Celle-ci a créé un espace numérique public permettant aux participants et au public de réagir aux notes, par le biais de commentaires en ligne ou d’échanges en personne. Ce faisant, elle a modifié la pratique de garder privées et hors de portée des participants les réflexions initiales du chercheur. Cette note se veut une démarche critique de son travail de maîtrise et de la pratique potentielle d’exclusion que constituent les notes de terrain gardées privées dans le contexte d’un projet de recherche participative. Ce texte soulève des questions sur le positionnement du chercheur et des préoccupations éthiques en lien avec l’archivage numérique de notes de terrain visuelles en tant que pratique ethnographie réflexive.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Burawoy, M. (2003). Revisits: An outline of a theory of reflexive ethnography. American Sociological Review, 68, 645-679.
- Burawoy, M. (2009). Extended case method: Four countries, four decades, four great transformations, and one theoretical tradition. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
- Burkholder, C. (2013). “Just the school makes us non-Chinese”: Contrasting the discourses of Hong Kong’s Education Bureau with the lived experiences of its non-Chinese speaking secondary school population. Journal of Educational Research for Social Change, 2(2), 43-58.
- Burkholder, C. (2015a, January 27). On managing isolation in the field. [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://caseyandthefield.wordpress.com/2015/01/27/on-managing-isolation-in-the-field/
- Burkholder, C. (2015b, January 28). Pok Fu Lam (after). [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://caseyandthefield.wordpress.com/2015/01/28/pok-fu-lam-after/
- Burkholder, C. (2015c, February 3). On coffee with Khan. [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://caseyandthefield.wordpress.com/2015/02/03/on-coffee-with-khan/
- Cunha, M. I., & Lima, A. (2010). Ethnography and the public sphere: Summarizing questions. Etnografica, 14(1), 61-69.
- Dockney, J., Tomaselli, K., & Hart, T. B. (2010). Cellphilms, mobile platforms and prodsumers: Hyper-individuality and film. The citizen in communication: Revisiting traditional, new and community media practices in South Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: Juta Press.
- Gubrium, A., & Harper, K. (2013). Participatory visual and digital methods. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
- Mitchell, C., & De Lange, N. (2013). What can a teacher do with a cellphone? Using participatory visual research to speak back in addressing HIV & AIDS. South African Journal of Education, 33(4), 1-13.
- Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2013). The big six historical thinking concepts. Scarborough, ON: Nelson Education.
- Thompson, J. (2014). On writing notes in the field: Interrogating positionality, emotion, participation and ethics. McGill Journal of Education, 49(1), 247-254.
10.7202/1025781ar