Craig, Hugh, director. Craig’s Zeta test. Other

Barber, Ros

doi:https://doi.org/10.33137/rr.v44i4.38652

Barber, Ros. 2020. “BDNE Zeta Dataset.” Goldsmiths Research Online. London: Goldsmiths, University of London. doi.org/10.25602/GOLD.00028390.

Google Scholar

Barber, Ros. 2020. “Big Data or Not Enough? Zeta Test Reliability and the Attribution of Henry VI.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 36 (3):542–64. doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaa041.

Google Scholar

Burrows, John. 2007. “All the Way Through: Testing for Authorship in Different Frequency Strata.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 22 (1):27–47. dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqi067.

Google Scholar

Craig, Hugh. 2009. “The Three Parts of Henry VI.” In Craig and Kinney, 44–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar

Craig, Hugh, and Arthur F. Kinney. 2009. Shakespeare, Computers, and the Mystery of Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar

Hoover, David L. 2007. “Corpus Stylistics, Stylometry, and the Styles of Henry James.” Style 41 (2):174–203. jstor.org/stable/10.5325/style.41.2.174.

Google Scholar

Rizvi, Pervez. 2019. “The Interpretation of Zeta Test Results.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 34 (2):401–18. doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqy038.

Google Scholar

Rudman, Joseph. 2016. “Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some Caveats.” Journal of Early Modern Studies 5:307–28. doi.org/10.13128/JEMS-2279-7149-18094.

Google Scholar

Rudman, Joseph. 1997. “The State of Authorship Attribution Studies: Some Problems and Solutions.” Language Resources and Evaluation 31 (4): 351– 65.

Google Scholar

Taylor, Gary, and Gabriel Egan, eds. 2017. The New Oxford Shakespeare Authorship Companion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199591169.001.0001.

Google Scholar

Parties annexes

Bibliography

Outils de citation

Citer cet article

Exporter la notice de cet article