Résumés
Abstract
The correspondence of Erasmus and Guillaume Budé represents an exemplary performance of the kind of intellectual exchange prized in humanistic circles of their day, though its sudden collapse has continued to puzzle interpreters. The design of this essay is to examine the prospects and perils of this epistolary venture set against the cultural, political, and religious circumstances of the time, and thus to show that this humanist project floundered not so much because of differences in personal character as due to fissures concealed in the rhetorical landscape over which these correspondents wished to travel. This rich and intricate theatre of humanist letters thereby illustrates both the noble aspirations and the inherent fragility of humanist discourse.
Keywords:
- Guillaume Budé,
- Erasmus,
- Correspondence,
- Humanism,
- Fragility
Résumé
La correspondance d’Érasme et de Guillaume Budé représente une performance exemplaire du type d’échange intellectuel prisé dans les cercles humanistes de leur époque, même si son effondrement soudain continue de laisser les interprètes perplexes. Cet article se donne pour fin d’examiner les perspectives et les périls de cette aventure épistolaire dans le contexte culturel, politique et religieux de l’époque, afin de montrer que ce projet humaniste a échoué non pas tant en raison de différences de caractère qu’à cause de failles dissimulées dans le paysage rhétorique que ces correspondants souhaitaient parcourir. Ce théâtre riche et complexe de lettres humanistes illustre ainsi à la fois les nobles aspirations et la fragilité inhérente au discours humaniste.
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Beaulieu, Benoît. “Utilité des lettres, selon Érasme.” Études littéraires 4, no. 2 (August 1971): 163–74. https://doi.org/10.7202/500180ar.
- Bietenholz, P. G. Basle and France in the Sixteenth Century: The Basle Humanists and Printers in Their Contacts with Francophone Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1971. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487571917.
- Budé, Guillaume. Guillaume Budé: Correspondance. Vol. 1, Les lettres Grecques. Translated by Guy Lavoie. Sherbrooke, QC: Université de Sherbrooke, 1977.
- Budé, Guillaume. L’étude des lettres: Principes pour sa juste et bonne institution. Translated by Marie-Madeleine de La Garanderie. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1988.
- Carrington, J. Laurel. “The Writer and His Style: Erasmus’ Clash with Guillaume Budé.” Erasmus of Rotterdam Society Yearbook 10 (1990): 61–84.
- Charlier, Yvonne. Érasme et l’amitié: D’après sa correspondance. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1977.
- Delaruelle, Louis. Répertoire analytique et chronologique de la correspondance de Guillaume Budé. Toulouse: Edouard Privat, 1907. Reprint, New York: B. Franklin, 1962.
- Delaruelle, Louis. “Une amitié d’humanistes. Étude sur les relations de Budé et d’Érasme d’après leur correspondance.” Musée Belge 9 (1905): 321–52.
- Eden, Kathy. Friends Hold All Things in Common: Tradition, Intellectual Property, and the Adages of Erasmus. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001.
- Erasmus, Desiderius. Collected Works of Erasmus [CWE]. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974–.
- Erasmus, Desiderius. Desiderii Erasmi Roterodami opera omnia. Edited by J. Leclerc. 10 vols. Leiden: P. van der Aa, 1703–6.
- Erasmus, Desiderius. Opera omnia Desiderii Erasmi Roterodami [ASD]. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing, 1969–.
- Erasmus, Desiderius. Opus epistolarum Des. Erasmi Roterodami [Allen]. Edited by P. S. Allen, H. M. Allen, and H. W. Garrod. 12 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1906–58.
- Fantazzi, Charles. “The Evolution of Erasmus’ Epistolary Style.” Renaissance and Reformation 25, no. 3 (1989): 263–88. https://doi.org/10.33137/rr.v25i3.12055.
- Farge, James K. Orthodoxy and Reform in Early Reformation France: The Faculty of Theology of Paris, 1500–1543. Leiden: Brill, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004475069.
- Farge, James K., ed. Religion, Reformation, and Repression in the Reign of Francis I: Documents of the Parlement of Paris, 1515–1547. Vol. 1, Documents: 1515–1543. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 2015.
- Gadoffre, Gilbert. La révolution culturelle dans la France des Humanistes: Guillaume Budé et François Ier. Geneva: Droz, 1997.
- Gray, Hanna H. “Renaissance Humanism: The Pursuit of Eloquence.” Journal of the History of Ideas 24, no. 4 (October 1963): 497–514. https://doi.org/10.2307/2707980.
- Greenblatt, Stephen. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
- Gueudet, Guy. L’Art de la lettre humaniste. Edited by Francine Wild. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2004. https://doi.org/10.15122/isbn.978-2-37312-620-4.
- Guillén, Claudio. “Notes toward the Study of the Renaissance Letter.” In Renaissance Genres: Essays on Theory, History, and Interpretation, edited by Barbara K. Lewalski, 70–110. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.
- Halkin, Léon-E. “Érasme et l’Europe.” In Érasme: Sa pensée et son comportement, 82–101. London: Variorum Reprints, 1988.
- Halkin, Léon-E. Erasmus ex Erasmo: Érasme éditeur de sa correspondance. Aubel: P. M. Gason, 1983.
- Henderson, Judith Rice. “Erasmus on the Art of Letter Writing.” In Renaissance Eloquence: Studies in the Theory and Practice of Renaissance Rhetoric, edited by James J. Murphy, 331–55. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.
- Henderson, Judith Rice. “Humanist Letter Writing: Private Conversation or Public Forum?” In Self-Presentation and Social Identification: The Rhetoric and Pragmatics of Letter Writing in Early Modern Times, edited by Toon Van Houdt, Jan Papy, Gilbert Tournoy, and Constant Matheeussen, 17–38. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2002.
- Henderson, Judith Rice. “On Reading the Rhetoric of the Renaissance Letter.” In Renaissance Rhetorik / Renaissance Rhetoric, edited by Heinrich F. Plett, 143–62. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857184.143.
- Horace. Satires; Epistles; The Art of Poetry. Translated by H. Rushton Fairclough. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
- Jardine, Lisa. Erasmus, Man of Letters: The Construction of a Charisma in Print. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.
- La Garanderie, Marie-Madeleine de. Christianisme et lettres profanes: Essai sur l’Humanisme français (1515–1535) et sur la pensée de Guillaume Budé. Paris: Honoré Champion, 1995.
- La Garanderie, Marie-Madeleine de, ed. La correspondance d’Érasme et de Guillaume Budé. Paris: J. Vrin, 1967.
- La Garanderie, Marie-Madeleine de. “Qui était Guillaume Budé?” Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 2 (June 1967): 192–211. https://doi.org/10.3406/bude.1967.2975.
- Mann, Margaret. Érasme et les débuts de la réforme française, 1517–1536. Paris: H. Champion, 1934.
- Martin, Terence J. Truth and Irony: Philosophical Meditations on Erasmus. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt18z4hst.
- McNeil, David O. Guillaume Budé and Humanism in the Reign of Francis I. Geneva: Droz, 1975.
- Mesnard, Pierre. “Le commerce épistolaire comme expression sociale de l’individualisme humaniste.” In Individu et société à la Renaissance: Colloque international tenu en avril 1965, 15–31. Brussels: Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles, 1967.
- More, Thomas. The Complete Works of St. Thomas More. Vol. 15, In Defense of Humanism: Letters to Dorp, Oxford, Lee, and a Monk. Edited by Daniel Kinney. New Haven, CT: Yale University, 1986.
- Najemy, John M. Between Friends: Discourses of Power and Desire in the Machiavelli-Vettori Letters of 1513–1515. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691194615.
- Phillips, Margaret Mann. “Erasmus and the Art of Writing.” In Scrinium Erasmianum, edited by J. Coppens, 335–50. Vol. 1. Leiden: Brill, 1969.
- Rummel, Erika. Erasmus and His Catholic Critics. Vol. 2, 1523–1536. Nieuwkoop: De Graaf, 1989.
- Sanchi, Luigi-Alberto. Les commentaires de la langue grecque de Guillaume Budé: L’œuvre, ses sources, sa préparation. Geneva: Droz, 2006.
- Thompson, Craig R. “Erasmus as Internationalist and Cosmopolitan.” Archiv für Reformationgeschichte 46 (1955): 167–95. https://doi.org/10.14315/arg-1955-jg13.
- Vaillancourt, Luc. La lettre familière au XVIe siècle: Rhétorique humaniste de l’épistolaire. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2003.
- Wallace, Joseph. “The Merits of Being Obscure: Erasmus and Budé Debate the Style, Shape, and Audience of Humanist Scholarship.” Moreana 46, no. 177–78 (2009): 199–229. https://doi.org/10.3366/more.2009.46.2-3.11.
10.7202/500180ar