Résumés
Résumé
Les relations industrielles (RI) influencent-elles la performance des organisations ? Des données financières de même que des données traitant d’une douzaine de pratiques RI et du climat RI ont été colligées dans 241 caisses populaires faisant partie du Mouvement Desjardins au Québec afin d’estimer l’effet des RI sur trois dimensions de la performance. Les résultats sont à l’effet que lorsque l’influence des autres déterminants est tenue constante, les pratiques RI et le climat RI ont un impact significatif sur la performance organisationnelle, en particulier sur la productivité et les coûts de main-d’oeuvre.
Summary
Do industrial relations (IR) influence organizational performance? This remains a fundamental question in IR since it is a matter of credibility and “bread-and-butter” for both academics and practitioners. Economic literature has explored the union impact on organizational performance, especially on the productivity dimension of performance. More recent studies state that performance is not determined by union presence per se but rather by the workplace climate and the union influence on the practices implemented. In the human resource management (HRM) literature, the system of practices is viewed as the proper unit of analysis in order to understand and evaluate the full impact of the IR or HRM practices on performance.
This study examines the economic conception of performance through three dimensions: productivity, efficiency (production costs), and profitability. The effects of HRM-IR practices and workplace climate on these dimensions of economic performance are tested here. Three complementary economic models are used in multivariate regression analysis to verify these relationships: production and cost functions, and a profitability determination model. Designed for the banking sector, all these models have already been tested in the same sector or on the same population and they control for many variables such as capital, assets, and labour input.
The evidence put forward in this article is based on 1994 data from 241 establishments affiliated with the Desjardins’ credit union Federation. Research data came from two main sources. The first source is the Federation where access was granted to information on the financial performance of credit unions and on the work force. The second source is a questionnaire on the HRM-IR practices in effect (presence and age) and on the workplace climate prevailing in each establishment. The questionnaire was distributed to every affiliate (324) and a rate of return of 74.4% was obtained. The establishments studied provide the ideal framework for this type of research in several ways: very similar activities and technologies, autonomy of the credit unions, availability of establishment-level performance data, etc.
The following indicators have been introduced in the estimates. First, we introduced indicators of three HRM-IR practices system dimensions that were created on factor analysis conducted on the HRM-IR practices indicators (number of years since implementation). In this sample, the system of workplace practices is found to be made up of three dimensions: (1) Mobilization, involving the presence of a monetary incentive plan, social activity committee, training program, succession plan, performance appraisal and information meetings; (2) Voice, associated with problem/grievance resolution, labour-management/personnel committee, written specification of working conditions, health and safety committee, and training committee; and (3) Involvement, associated with a suggestion system and colloquium. Second, a workplace climate index, based on turnover, disciplinary actions per employee, days of absenteeism per employee, and days lost because of work accidents per employee, was also included in the estimates to test the influence of work climate.
Statistical analysis shows that all dimensions have positive and statistically significant links with productivity. None of the factors has a significant impact on production costs or on profitability. Finally, a poor workplace climate is associated significantly in all estimates with lower productivity and higher production costs as expected. The net effect of this variable on profitability is negative although not significantly. This study reveals that IR features have a significant impact on organizational performance.
The results suggest that the HRM-IR practices system and workplace climate represent more adequate and precise indicators of the IR system at the establishment level than do for instance, union presence or individual practices. In accordance with the configurational approach, the results confirm that the most substantial effect on performance is obtained when practices are considered as a system. This implies that there is no “magic bullet,” no single practice that can achieve the same kind of results. Other results suggest, based on the age of the practices implemented, that costs associated with the IR-HRM practices can be written off over time. The implication is that there is a delay before the practices achieve the desired outcomes and one must be patient before judging the value of the practices implemented. The research also suggests that the workplace climate is a determinant of the economic performance. So climate should also be considered when practitioners are looking for ways to improve their organization’s performance. The results show finally that more than one dimension of firm performance should be considered in order to understand how HRM and IR do influence the firm performance. It remains necessary to continue the research with larger data banks, collected over a longer time period, and to study other industries and individual cases in order to corroborate our original contribution to this complex but important question.
Resúmen
¿Las relaciones industriales (RI) influencian el rendimiento de las organizaciones? Las informaciones financieras y los datos concernientes a una dozena de practicas de RI y al clima de relaciones laborales provienen de 241 Cajas Populares del Movimiento Desjardins en Quebec. El objetivo del estudio es de estimar el efecto de las RI sobre tres dimensiones del rendimiento. Los resultados indican que cuando la influencia de otros factores es mantenida constante, las practicas de RI y el clima de relaciones laborales tienen un impacto significativo sobre el rendimiento organizacional, en particular sobre la productividad y los costos de mano de obra.
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Addison, J. T. et B. T. Hirsh. 1989. « Union Effects on Productivity, Profits and Growth : Has the Long Run Arrived ? ». Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 7, no 1, 72–105.
- Arthur, J. B. 1994. « Effects of Human Resource Systems on Manufacturing Performance and Turnover ». Academy of Management, vol. 37, no 3, 670–687.
- Bailey, T., P. Berg et C. Sandy. 2001. « The Effect of High-Performance Work Practices on Employee Earnings in the Steel, Apparel, and Medical Electronics and Imaging Industries ». Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 54, no 2a, extra issue « Industry Studies of Wage Inequality », 525–543.
- Barbash, J. 1989. « Equity as a Function : Its Rise and Attribution ». Theories and Concepts in Comparative Industrial Relations. J. Barbash et K. Barbash, dir. Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina Press, 113–122.
- Barrette, J. et R. Ouellette. 2000. « Gestion de la performance : impact sur la performance organisationnelle de l’intégration de la stratégie et de la cohérence des systèmes de GRH ». Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations, vol. 55, no 2, 207–226.
- Becker, B. E. et B. Gerhart. 1996. « The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance : Progress and Prospects ». Academy of Management Journal, vol. 39, no 4, 779–801.
- Becker, B. et M. A. Huselid. 1998. « High Performance Work Systems and Firm Performance : A Synthesis of Research and Managerial Implications ». Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. G. Ferris, dir. Stamford, Conn. : JAI Press, vol. 16, 53–101.
- Belman, D. 1992. « Unions, the Quality of Labor Relations and Firm Performance ».Unions and Economic Competitiveness. P. Voos et L. Mishel, dir. Armonk, N.Y. : Economic Policy Institute, M. E. Sharpe, 60–99.
- Bemmels, B. 1987. « How Unions Affect Productivity in Manufacturing Plants ». Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 40, no 2, 241–253.
- Berg, P., E. Appelbaum, T. Bailey et A. L. Kalleberg. 1996. « The Performance Effects of Modular Production in the Apparel Industry ». Industrial Relations, vol. 35, no 3, 356–373.
- Betcherman, G., K. McMullen, N. Leckie et C. Caron. 1994. Les transformations du milieu de travail au Canada. Rapport final du Projet sur la gestion des ressources humaines, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont., Industrial Relations Centre (traduction).
- Boisclair, G. 1994. L’efficience dans l’allocation des frais d’exploitation dans les institutions de dépôts : une étude empirique des économies d’échelle et d’envergure chez les caisses populaires Desjardins du Québec. Université du Québec à Montréal, Chaire de coopération Guy-Bernier, Cahier 0394–060.
- Cappelli, P. et D. Neumark. 2001. « Do High Performance Work Practices Improve Establishment-Level Outcomes ? ». Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 54, no 4, 737–775.
- Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J. 1991. « The Impact on Economic Performance of a Transformation in Workplace Relations ». Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 44, no 2, 241–260.
- Dastmalchian, A., P. Blyton et R. Adamson. 1991. The Climate of Workplace Relations. London : Routledge.
- Delery, J. E. et D. H. Doty. 1996. « Modes of Theorizing in Strategic Human Resource Management : Tests of Universalistic, Contingency and Configurational Performance Prediction ». Academy of Management Journal, vol. 39, no 4, 802–835.
- Dunlop, J. T. [1958] 1993. Industrial Relations Systems. New York : Harvard Business School Press.
- Dunlop, J. T. et D. Weil. 1996. « Diffusion and Performance of Modular Production in the U.S. Apparel Industry ». Industrial Relations, vol. 35, no 3, 334–355.
- Dyer, L. et T. Reeves. 1995. « Human Resource Strategies and Firm Performance : What Do We Know and Where Do We Go ? ». The International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 6, no 2, 656–670.
- Eaton, A. E. et P. B. Voos. 1992. « Unions and Contemporary Innovations in Work Organization, Compensation, and Employee Participation ». Unions and Economic Competitiveness. P. Voos et L. Mishel, dir. Armonk, N.Y. : Economic Policy Institute, M. E. Sharpe, 173–215.
- Freeman, R. B. et J. L. Medoff. 1984. What Do Unions Do ? New York : Basic Books.
- Gerhart, B. 1999. « Human Resource Management and Firm Performance : Measurement Issues and their Effects on Causal and Policy Inferences ». Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. G. Ferris, dir. Stamford, Conn. : JAI Press, Suppl. 4, 31–51.
- Godard, J. 2001. « High Performance and the Transformation of Work ? The Implications of Alternative Work Practices for the Experience and Outcomes of Work ». Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 54, no 4, 776–805.
- Graddy, D. B. et G. Hall. 1985. « Unionization and Productivity in Commercial Banking ». Journal of Labor Research, vol. 7, no 3, 249–262.
- Hirsh, B. T. 1991. Labor Unions and the Economic Performance of Firms. Kalamazoo, Mich. : W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
- Hunter, L. W. et F. K. Pil. 1995. « How Do You Survey Firms ? ». Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association held in Washington, January 6–8 1995. P. Voos, dir. Madison, Wisc. : IRRA, 152–162.
- Huselid, M. A. 1995. « The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance ». Academy of Management Journal, vol. 38, no 3, 635–672.
- Huselid, M. A. et B. E. Becker. 1996. « Methodological Issues in Cross Sectional and Panel Estimates of the Human Resource-Firm Performance Link ». Industrial Relations, vol. 35, no 3, 400–422.
- Ichniowski, C. 1986. « The Effects of Grievance Activity on Productivity ». Industrial and LaborRelations Review, vol. 40, no 1, 75–89.
- Ichniowski, C. 1990. Human Resource Management Systems and the Performance of U.S. Manufacturing Businesses. Cambridge, Mass. : National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 3449.
- Ichniowski, C., T. A. Kochan, D. Levine, C. Olson et G. Strauss. 1996. « What Works at Work : Overview and Assessment ». Industrial Relations, vol. 35, no 3, 299–333.
- Ichniowski, C., K. Shaw et G. Prennushi. 1997. « The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity : A Study of Steel Finishing Lines ». American Economic Review, vol. 87, no 3, 291–313.
- Jalette, P. 1997. The Impact of Human Resource Management and Industrial Relations Practices on the Organizational Performance of Credit Unions in Québec. Human Resources Development Canada, Applied Research Branch, Strategic Policy, Working Paper W–97–6E.
- Katz, H. C., T. A. Kochan et K. Gobeille. 1983. « Industrial Relations Performance, Economic Performance and QWL Programs : An Interplant Analysis ». Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 37, no 1, 3–17.
- Katz, H. C., T. A. Kochan et M. R. Weber. 1985. « Assessing the Effects of Industrial Relations Systems and Efforts to Improve the Quality of Working Life on Organizational Effectiveness ». Academy of Management Journal, vol. 28, no 3, 509–526.
- Katz, H. C., T. A. Kochan et J. H. Keefe. 1987. « Industrial Relations and Productivity in the U.S. Automobile Industry ». Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 3, 685–715.
- Kelley, M. R. 1996. « Participative Bureaucracy and Productivity in the Machined Products Sector ». Industrial Relations, vol. 35, no 3, 374–399.
- Kleiner, M. M., G. Nickelsburg et A. Pilarski. 1995. « Monitoring, Grievances, and Plant Performance ». Industrial Relations, vol. 34, no 2, 169–189.
- Kochan, T. A., H. C. Katz et R. B. McKersie. [1986] 1994. The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. New York : ILR Press.
- Laflamme, D. 1993. Un modèle économétrique de la marge bénéficiaire des institutions de dépôt sises au Canada et au Québec. Université du Québec à Montréal, Chaire de coopération Guy-Bernier, Cahier 0493–049.
- LeLouarn, J.-Y. et A. Gosselin. 2000. « GRH et profits : y a-t-il un lien ? ». Effectif, avril-mai, 18–23.
- MacDuffie, J. P. 1995. « Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance : Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry ». Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 48, no 2, 197–221.
- Mefford, R. N. 1986. « The Effect of Unions on Productivity in a Multinational Manufacturing Company ». Industrial Relations and Labor Review, vol. 40, no 1, 105–114.
- Meltz, N. M. 1989. « Industrial Relations : Balancing Efficiency and Equity ». Theories and Concepts in Comparative Industrial Relations. J. Barbash et K. Barbash, dir. Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina Press, 109–113.
- Morin, E. M., A. Savoie et G. Beaudin. 1994. L’efficacité de l’organisation : théories, représentations et mesures. Montréal : Gaëtan Morin Éditeur.
- Norsworthy, J. R. et C. A. Zabala. 1985. « Worker Attitudes, Worker Behavior, and Productivity in the U.S. Automobile Industry, 1959–1976 ». Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 38, no 4, 544–557.
- Pil, F. K. et J. P. MacDuffie. 1996. « The Adoption of High-Involvement Work Practices ». Industrial Relations, vol. 35, no 3, 423–455.
- Rogers, E. W. et P. M. Wright. 1998. Measuring Organizational Performance in Strategic Human Resource Management : Looking beyond the Lamppost. Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Department of Human Resource Studies, Working Paper 98–24.
- Steers, R. M. 1977. Organizational Effectiveness : A Behavioral View. Santa Monica, Calif. : Goodyear Publishing Company.
- Stephen, M. D. 1993. Collective Bargaining Outcomes and the Performance of the Firm. Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, Centre for Industrial Relations.
- Théoret, R. 1991. « Un modèle économétrique des marges bénéficiaires des caisses populaires Desjardins du Québec et des banques à charte canadiennes ». L’Actualité économique, vol. 67, no 1, 58–79.
- Walton, R. E. et R. B. McKersie. [1965] 1993. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations : An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. New York : McGraw-Hill.