Résumés
Abstract
Dr. John Polidori’s appropriative rewriting of Lord Byron’s unfinished “Fragment” as The Vampyre has long been of interest to the field of Gothic studies for its representation of the first coherent vampire in English Literature. In recent years, the inscription of sexual rhetoric in both texts has attracted further critical attention. Featuring men who traverse the explosively tense line between compulsory homosocial relations and the culturally prohibited horrors of homoerotic desire, these texts can certainly be read in the light of Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s identification of the homophobic “paranoid gothic.” However, considered together, The Vampyre and the “Fragment” reveal more than anxieties about male bonding. In this essay, I explore the nexus of concerns raised by The Vampyre, its relation to the “Fragment,” and the perceived relationship between Polidori and Byron with the aim of working towards a repositioning of these marginal Gothic works as indeed both disquieting and deeply queer. The “Fragment” represents Byron’s contribution to the now mythical “ghost story competition” at Villa Diodati in 1816 which also inspired the writing of Frankenstein. The man Mary Shelley dubbed “Poor Polidori” stands on the margins of this famous gathering, but he and his story remain a haunting presence in more than one respect. Focussing upon the way in which modern sexual discourse has helped make the author into an object of sexual interest, I propose that the production of Polidori as a strange, sexually suspect figure strikingly illustrates how the Gothic rhetoric of the sexual “unspeakable” can reverberate out from the text and into our thinking about the author.
Parties annexes
Works Cited
- Barbour, Judith. “Dr. John William Polidori, Author of the Vampyre.” Imagining Romanticism: Essays on English and Australian Romanticisms. Ed. Deirdre Coleman and Peter Otto. West Cornell, CN: Locust Hill, 1992. 85-110.
- Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author.” Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader. Ed. David Lodge. London: Longman, 1988. 167-172.
- Bersani, Leo. “Is the Rectum a Grave?” Aids: Cultural Analysis, Cultural Activism. Ed. Douglas Crimp. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT P, 1988. 197-222.
- Boone, Troy. “Mark of the Vampire: Arnod Paole, Sade, Polidori.” Nineteenth-Century Contexts 18 (1995): 349-366.
- Butler, Judith. “Critically Queer.” GLQ 1 (1995): 17-32.
- Byron, George Gordon. “Fragment.” The Vampyre and Other Tales of the Macabre. Ed. Robert Morrison and Chris Baldick. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1997. 246-251.
- Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. “Monster Culture (Seven Theses).” Monster Theory: Reading Culture. Ed. Jeffrey Jerome Cohen. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1996. 1-25.
- Crompton, Louis. Byron and Greek Love: Homophobia in Nineteenth-century England. Berkeley: U of California P, 1985.
- Dinshaw, Carolyn. “Chaucer’s Queer Touches/A Queer Touches Chaucer.” Exemplaria 7.1 (Spring 1995): 75-92.
- Dyer, Richard. “Children of the Night: Vampirism as Homosexuality and Homosexuality as Vampirism.” Sweet Dreams: Sexuality, Gender and Popular Fiction. Ed. Susannah Radstone. London: Lawrence, 1988. 47-72.
- Edelman, Lee. Homographesis: Essays in Gay Literary and Cultural Theory. New York: Routledge, 1994.
- Foucault, Michel. “What is an Author?” Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader. Ed. David Lodge. London: Longman, 1988. 197-210.
- ———. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: The Will to Knowledge. Trans. Robert Hurley. London: Penguin, 1998.
- ———. “Of Other Spaces.” Diacritics 16.1 (Spring 1986): 22-27.
- Frankenstein: The True Story. Dir. Jack Smight. T.V. Film, Universal, 1973.
- Frayling, Christopher. Vampires: From Lord Byron to Count Dracula. London: Faber, 1991.
- Friedman, Geraldine. “Pseudonymity, Passing and Queer Biography: The Case of Mary Diana Dods.” Romanticism on the Net 23 (Aug. 2001). 1 Aug. 2002. <http://www.erudit.org/revue/ron/2001/v/n23/005985ar.html>.
- Gelder, Ken. Reading the Vampire. London: Routledge, 1994.
- Greven, David. “Flesh in the Word: Billy Budd, Sailor, Compulsory Homosociality and the Uses of Queer Desire.” Genders 37 (2003). 18 June 2003. <http://www.genders.org/g37/g37_greven.html>.
- Gothic. Dir. Ken Russell. Virgin Visions, 1986.
- Hanson, Ellis. “Undead.” Inside/Out: Lesbian Theories, Gay Theories. Ed. Diana Fuss. London: Routledge, 1991. 324-340.
- Lavelley, Albert J. “The Stage and Film Children of Frankenstein: A Survey.” The Endurance of Frankenstein: Essays on Mary Shelley’s Novel. Ed. George Levine. Berkeley: U of California P, 1979. 243-289.
- Macdonald, D. L. Poor Polidori: A Critical Biography of the Author of the Vampyre. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1991.
- McGavran, James Holt. “‘Insurmountable Barriers to Our Union’: Homosocial Male Bonding, Homosexual Panic, and Death on the Ice in Frankenstein.” European Romantic Review 10 (1999): 46-67.
- Morrill, David. F. “‘Twilight is not good for Maidens’: Uncle Polidori and the Psychodynamics of Vampirism in Goblin Market.” Victorian Poetry 28.1 (Spring 1990): 1-16.
- Morrison, Robert, and Chris Baldick, eds. The Vampyre and Other Tales of the Macabre. By John Polidori. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1997.
- Polidori, John. The Vampyre and Other Tales of the Macabre. Ed. Robert Morrison and Chris Baldick. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1997.
- Rieger, James. “Dr. Polidori and the Genesis of Frankenstein.” Studies in English Literature 3 (1963): 461-472.
- Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia UP, 1985.
- ———. Epistemology of the Closet. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991.
- ———. Tendencies. Durham: Duke UP, 1993.
- ———. “Gender Criticism: What Isn’t Gender?” The Homepage of Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick at Duke University. 21 Nov. 2002. <http://www.duke.edu/~sedgwic/WRITING/gender.htm>.
- Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Ed. Maurice Hindle. London: Penguin, 1992.
- Skarda, Patricia. “Vampirism and Plagiarism: Byron’s Influence and Polidori’s Practice.” Studies in Romanticism 28 (Summer 1989): 249-69.