Résumés
Abstract
This article investigates how and why the Gothic can be described as camp. Examining the ascription of ‘camp’ by Susan Sontag and others to describe the Gothic, it suggests that the Gothic is camp because it is queer. Moving away from a reading of camp as a style stripped of its queer meanings (in particular the reading of the Gothic as camp because it is ‘theatrical’, ‘hyperbolical’ or ‘artificial’) a reading of camp is offered that uses queer theory which questions the naturality and authenticity of gender. In particular, Fabio Cleto’s idea of how camp represents a crisis of reading the signs of naturality can be applied to the Gothic’s use of the supernatural. The queer valency of Gothic writing, especially in texts such as The Monk, emerges in how the body can be misinterpreted. In The Monk, the voice and the gaze as conduits of desire and phobia are those signifiers of the body that are shown to disturb a sex-gender binary and to provoke a crisis of reading. This anxiety about seeing and understanding desire in not-so-easily visible bodies (like the supernatural) connects to socio-cultural anxieties about how reading gender to read same-sex desire is unstable in the early nineteenth century. An overview of how queer helps us to understand why the Gothic is camp is offered, and then a specific analysis of where the camp effects occur in The Monk is provided through a close reading.
Parties annexes
Works Cited
- Blakemore, Stephen. “Matthew Lewis’s Black Mass: Sexual, Religious Inversion in The Monk.” Studies in the Novel 30 (1998): 521-539.
- Brewer, William D. “Transgendering in Matthew Lewis’s The Monk.” Gothic Studies 6.2 (2004): 192-207.
- Booth, Mark. “Campe-Toi!: On the Origins and Definitions of Camp.” Camp: Queer Aesthetics and the Performing Subject: A Reader. Ed. Fabio Cleto. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999. 66-79.
- Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge, 1990.
- Cleto, Fabio. “Introduction: Queering the Camp.” Camp: Queer Aesthetics and the Performing Subject: A Reader. Ed. Fabio Cleto. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999. 1-42.
- Collings, David and Michael O’Rourke. “Introduction: Queer Romanticisms: Past, Present and Future.” Romanticism on the Net 36-37 (November 2004 -February 2005) <http://www.erudit.org/revue/ron/2004/v/n36-37/011132ar.html>.
- Crompton, Louis. Byron and Greek Love: Homophobia in 19th Century England. Swafham: The Gay Men’s Press, 1985.
- Doty, Alexander. Flaming Classics: Queering the Film Canon. London and New York: Routledge, 2000.
- Grantley, Darryll. ‘ “What means this shew?” Theatricalism, Camp and Subversion in Doctor Faustus and The Jew of Malta.”Christopher Marlowe and English Renaissance Culture. Ed. Grantley, Darryll and Peter Roberts. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1996.
- Hanson, Ellis. Decadence and Catholicism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997.
- Hogle, Jerold E. “The Ghost of the Counterfeit—and the Closet—in The Monk.” Romanticism on the Net 8 (November 1997) <http://www.erudit.org/revue/ron/1997/v/n8/005770ar.html>.
- Jagose, Annamarie. Queer Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press, 1996.
- Lewis, Matthew. The Monk. Ed. Christopher MacLachlan. London: Penguin, 1998.
- McCarthy, Fiona. Byron: Life and Legend. London: John Murray, 2002.
- McCormick, Ian. Ed. Secret Sexualities: A Sourcebook of 17th and 18th Century Writing. London: Routledge, 1997.
- MacDonald, D. L. Monk Lewis: A Critical Biography. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000.
- Meyer, Moe. The Politics and Poetics of Camp. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.
- Miles, Robert. “Ann Radcliffe and Matthew Lewis.” A Companion to the Gothic. Ed. David Punter. Oxford: Blackwells Publishing, 2000.
- Mowl, Timothy. Horace Walpole: The Great Outsider. London: John Murray, 1996.
- ———. William Beckford: Composing for Mozart. London: John Murray, 1998.
- Mulman, Lisa Noami. “Sexuality on the Surface: Catholicism and the Erotic Object in Lewis's The Monk.” Bucknell Review 42.1 (1998): 98-110.
- O’Donnell, Katherine and Michael O’Rourke. Queer Masculinities: Siting Same-Sex Desire in the Early Modern World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
- Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Tendencies. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.
- ———. The Coherence of Gothic Conventions. 1980. London: Methuen, 1986.
- Tobin, Robert. Warm Brothers: Queer Theory and the Age of Goethe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000.
- Tuite, Clara. “Cloistered Closets: Enlightenment Pornography, The Confessional State, Homosexual Persecution and The Monk.” Romanticism on the Net 8 (November 1997) <http://www.erudit.org/revue/ron/1997/v/n8/005766ar.html>.