Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Cohen, Y., Pepin, J., Lamontagne, E. et Duquette, A. (dir.). (2004). Les sciences infirmières : genèse d’une discipline. Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
- De Solla Price, Derek J. (1963). Little science, big science. Columbia University Press.
- Evans, J. A. et Reimer, J. (2009). Open access and global participation in science. Science, 323(5917), 1025. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154562
- Guédon, J.C. (2014). Le libre accès et la « Grande Conversation » scientifique. Dans M. Vitali-Rosati et M. E. Sinatra (dir.), Pratiques de l’édition numérique. Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, (p.111-126).
- Herzog, C., Hook, D. et Konkiel, S. (2020). Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 387-395. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00020
- Larivière, V., Haustein, S. et Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLOS One, 10(6), e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
- Larivière, V., Archambault, É., Gingras, Y. et Vignola‐Gagné, É. (2006). The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 997-1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20349
- Meadows, A. J. (1979). The scientific journal. Aslib.
- Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J.P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J. et Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6, p.e4375, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375
- Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-Garcia, N. et Castillo-Valdivieso, P. A. (2020). Open Access and Altmetrics in the pandemic age: Forescast analysis on COVID-19 literature. BioRxiv. Prépublication. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.23.057307
- Visser, M., van Eck, N. J. et Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 20-41. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112
- Wouters, P., Sugimoto, C. R., Larivière, V., McVeigh, M. E., Pulverer, B., de Rijcke, S. et Waltman, L. (2019). Rethinking impact factors: Better ways to judge a journal. Nature, 569, 621-623. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01643-3