Résumés
Abstract
The article offers a detailed and in-depth insight into the use and meaning of the concept “modern” by Georg Simmel. From the late 1880s onwards, Simmel presents himself as part of the Naturalism movement – which he also calls “movement of the new culture” – and he continued using the word “modern”. In reviewing his oeuvre, it is noticeable that ‘modern’ was first used by him in the late 1880s, and then excessively so in the early 1890s, with a view to a concrete object, namely the “modern worldview”, or “modern philosophy of life”; from the mid-1890s ‘modern’ ceased in his works, and he now focused on “modern culture” in the broader sense and on “modern lifestyle” in “The Philosophy of Money” (1900). The positive connotation of the term ‘modern’ is almost completely lost in Simmel’s publications as well as in his private letters during the war years 1914 to 1918, and if so, the time frame of ‘modern’ extends over decades, even centuries, probably with the function of making the shortcomings of the present comprehensible. After ascertaining what Simmel meant by ‘modernity’, the author addresses three fundamental aspects of Simmel’s conception of modernity, namely his remarks on lifestyle and his method of investigation that starts directly from the simply given object or ‘thing’ and connects it with the last spiritual meanings. Two closely related characteristics of Simmel’s further work are based on this method: he was the first sociologist who was able to start with things – the handle, the frame, the ruin, the jewellery, the bridge, the door, the chair, etc. – so that he was praised as the inventor of “thing sociology”, and in the 1890s he found the type of text that seemed appropriate for his thinking: the philosophical essay.
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Literaturverzeichnis
- Bertaux F. und P. (1981). “Berlin 1880 bis 1890 – Hauptstadt des Naturalismus”. In: Hellmut Kühn (Hg.): Preußen Dein Spree-Athen. Beiträge zu Literatur, Theater und Musik in Berlin. Reinbek: Rowohlt.
- Ernst P. (1949). “Erinnerungen an Simmel”. In: Kurt Gassen/Michael Landmann (Hg.): Buch des Dankes an Georg Simmel. Briefe, Erinnerungen, Bibliographie. Zu seinem 100. Geburtstag am 1. März 1958. Stuttgart: Koehler.
- Landmann E. (1958). “Erinnerungen an Simmel”. In: Kurt Gassen/Michael Landmann (Hg.): Buch des Dankes an Georg Simmel. Briefe, Erinnerungen, Bibliographie. Zu seinem 100. Geburtstag am 1. März 1958. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
- Lange A. (1984). Berlin zur Zeit Bebels und Bismarcks zwischen Reichsgründung und Jahrhundertwende. Berlin: Dietz.
- Matthias L. (1958). “Erinnerungen an Simmel”. In: Kurt Gassen/ Michael Landmann: Buch des Dankes an Georg Simmel. Briefe, Erinnerungen, Bibliographie. Zu seinem 100. Geburtstag am 1. März 1958. Stuttgart: Koehler.
- Mauthner F. (1918). “Georg Simmel. Geboren 1. März 1858, gestorben 26. September 1918”. In: Vossische Zeitung vom 18. Okt. 1918.
- Mommsen W. J. (Hg.) (1969). Das Zeitalter des Imperialismus. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer.
- Rosenberg H. (1967). Große Depression und Bismarkzeit. Wirtschaftsablauf, Gesellschaft und Politik in Mitteleuropa. Berlin: de Gruyter.
- Scheu R. (1898). “Kinder des Positivismus”. In: Die Zeit, Nr. 201 vom 6. Wien.
- Schutte J. und Sprengel P. (Hg.). (1987). Die Berliner Moderne 1885-1914. Stuttgart: Reclam.
- Simmel G. (1989-2015). Georg Simmel Gesamtausgabe (here cited as GSG). Ed. by Otthein Rammstedt et al. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 24 volumes.
Parties annexes
Biographical note
Otthein Rammstedt came to the Faculty of Sociology at Bielefeld University in 1968 as Niklas Luhmann’s first assistant. In 1980 he became professor of Sociology, in particular Social history and Social philosophy. Rammstedt’s best-known work is the historical study of German sociology 1933-1945. He was the editor of the 24-volume critical complete edition of the works of Georg Simmel. The material collected in Bielefeld in the Georg Simmel Archive is available to all interested for further research.