Documents found
-
494.More information
AbstractTo allocate roles has become self-evident: to the writer, the voice, to the critic, reflexive knowledge. On the one hand, the writer's mystique, often dominant today, on the other, the scientific obsession. In the tradition of French critical writing, this simplistic dualism is not without consequences. Too often, it reduces the exercise of thought to the impersonal construction of a discourse where subjectivity is no longer accepted. Leiris, Quignard, Barthes, Sartre, Calvino, Adorno have, in turn, questioned the relation between voice and knowledge, between the subject and the grammar, calling forth a critical discourse in which a rigorous analysis does not clash with rhythm, in which a singular voice, alive and well-informed addresses the reader within a relationship both speculative and emotional.
-
495.
-
496.
-
497.
-
499.