Documents found

  1. 161.

    Article published in Annuaire des collectivités locales (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 22, Issue 1, 2002

    Digital publication year: 2009

  2. 162.

    Article published in Revue internationale de droit comparé (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 70, Issue 4, 2018

    Digital publication year: 2022

    More information

    Whether an individual binding agreement does or does not fit into a legal category is a question seldom asked about English law and hardly associated with it. In view of the recharacterisation of a «sale » on retention of property clause as a sui generis contract by the UKSC in The Res Cogitans case, the present paper seeks to assess some of the similarities and differences between English and French reasonings where the typicality of a contract is to be decided.

  3. 163.

    Vézina, Alain

    Bête de scènes

    Article published in Séquences (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Issue 242, 2006

    Digital publication year: 2010

  4. 164.

    La Chance, Michaël

    The Matrix

    Article published in 24 images (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Issue 122, 2005

    Digital publication year: 2010

  5. 165.

    Article published in Séquences (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Issue 256, 2008

    Digital publication year: 2010

  6. 166.

    Lemieux, Philippe

    Georges Lucas

    Article published in Séquences (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Issue 238, 2005

    Digital publication year: 2010

  7. 167.

    Haradji, Helen

    Retour vers le futur

    Article published in 24 images (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Issue 177, 2016

    Digital publication year: 2016

  8. 168.

    Article published in Annuaire français de droit international (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 62, Issue 1, 2016

    Digital publication year: 2022

  9. 169.

    Article published in Québec français (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Issue 139, 2005

    Digital publication year: 2010

  10. 170.

    Article published in Revue québécoise de droit international (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 18, Issue 2, 2005

    Digital publication year: 2020

    More information

    The dispute settlement mechanism of the World Trade Organization appears as the central pillar of the multilateral trading system and main efficient tool for the implementation of the international trade law. The first part of the article aims at pointing out the main characteristics of this dispute settlement mechanism. As a global one, it has to be used by the Members in order to solve all the disputes rising among them when they apply the different WTO agreements. As an integrated mechanism, it has been established within the Organization as the only one to be used instead of taking unilateral action. That means abiding by the agreed procedures and respecting judgements. Therefore, the rule of law sounds as the ground basis of the mechanism, ensuring its efficiency and legitimacy. The second part deals with the main procedure provided by the dispute settlement understanding (DSU), which does resemble a judicial one. The different stages (consultations, panel and appeal) aim at guarantying a fair and equitable procedure based on the rule of law, in a quasi-judicial form. If condemned, the Member's measure has to be brought into conformity with WTO Law. Thus, the main originality of the mechanism relies on the possibility of taking authorized counter-measures in order to pressure the Member that fails to comply with the DSB's recommendation. The rule of law, the strict delays, and the higher automaticity in the adoption of the reports by the so-called “reversed consensus” tend to reinforce the security and the predictability of the multilateral trading system.