You are on Érudit's new platform. Enjoy! Switch to classic view

Notes

The Rock and Boulder Gardens: a Rock Labyrinth in the Rocky Mountains

  • Karen D. Hincks and
  • David M. Cruden

…more information

  • Karen D. Hincks
    AMEC Earth & Environmental, 221 18th Street SE, Calgary, Alberta T2E 6J5
    khincks@amec.com

  • David M. Cruden
    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 220 Civil Engineering Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G7.
    dcruden@ualberta.ca

Article body

Introduction

A rock labyrinth, known as the Rock and Boulder Gardens occurs in the Colin Range of the Rocky Mountains at a latitude of 52° 55’ 38” W and a longitude of 118° 00’ 50” N at an elevation of 1 060 m asl, 5 km northeast of Jasper, in Jasper National Park (Fig. 1). The labyrinth is similar to those described by Sokolov (1961), in which blocks separated along joints by translation along bedding surfaces. Simmons and Cruden (1980) described a similar rock labyrinth in the Front Ranges of the Rocky Mountains.

The structural geology and slope, that control the mode of movement in the labyrinth, and the possible modes of rock slope movement are discussed.

Geology

The Rock and Boulder Gardens are developed towards the top of the Palliser Formation (Fig. 1), a thickly-bedded Devonian limestone with dolomitic mottling (Mountjoy and Price, 1985). The upper section of the Palliser contains beds with indistinct, thin to medium bedding.

The dip of bedding ranges from 14° to 47°, toward 198° to 270°, with an average 24° dip. The average dip was calculated using the program Dips (Hoek and Diederichs, 1989), using weighted contouring of the data points. Two sets of joints occur perpendicular to bedding, one parallel to the strike of the beds, the other parallel to their dip.

Labyrinth

The boulders in the labyrinth are all rectangular prisms with little rounding; they appear to have broken apart along joint surfaces, and some of these have karren on them. The average bedding dip within the labyrinth is 24° toward 224°, yet the range of dip angles and dip directions (Fig. 2) indicate that some of the blocks have rotated. Dip angles range from 18° to 45° for the blocks that are not obviously rotated, and up to 65° for the blocks that do appear to have rotated. Dip directions in the labyrinth range from 198° to 270° for the blocks that do not appear to be rotated, and up to 300° for blocks that are not in their original orientation. Joint orientations for the labyrinth show two preferred orientations about the strike and dip of the bedding.

A map of the labyrinth produced by traverses along the joints shows the nature of the deposit (Fig. 2). The largest block within the labyrinth, the Big Boulder, is 11.1 m high, 12.0 m wide in the direction of dip, and 19.2 m wide in the direction of strike of the bedding within the block (Fig. 2). The separation of joints ranges up to 9.0 m with the common spacing between 1 and 2 m. Where the blocks are separated along joints, pine needles, rock and boulder debris, fallen trees, moss and other vegetation fill in the gaps (Hincks, 2003).

Scarp and Sink

The sink of the Rock and Boulder Gardens is the wedge-shaped depression visible on aerial photos. The depression is bounded to the south by a subvertical rock wall, the Rock Gardens, which trends east-west. A much gentler slope of 14° to 47° to the southwest, the scarp, bounds the feature to the north and the east. The sink is bounded to the west by a transitional area, filled with boulders in different orientations, into the labyrinth. The boundary between the sink and the labyrinth is marked by large, displaced blocks in the depression and is densely forested.

Figure 1

Bedrock geology in the vicinity of the Rock and Boulder Gardens, the scarp and sink, the labyrinth and the colluvium.

Géologie du substratum dans le secteur de Rock and Boulder Gardens, escarpement, cuvette, labyrinthe et colluvions.

-> See the list of figures

Figure 2

Map of the labyrinth and some orientations of other boulders down slope, at a scale of 1:500.

Carte du labyrinthe et orientation de quelques gros blocs en bas de pente, à l’échelle de 1/500.

-> See the list of figures

Other Examples of Rock Labyrinths and Rock Cities

Sokolov (1961) defined a labyrinth as “a very distinctive type of block slide, related in a general way with settling on slopes” (p. 72). The labyrinth that he described from the Caucasus involved rocks with dips between 10° and 23° on slopes of 30° to 40° into the Khosta River canyon. The labyrinth formed in limestones that were 5.5 m thick, and movement occurred in three directions (Sokolov, 1961).

Simmons and Cruden (1980) described a rock labyrinth in Mississippian, Pennsylvanian and Permian rocks in the Front Ranges of the Rocky Mountains in Alberta, west of the Red Deer River (Table I). The average dip of the rocks in the area was 22°, with two sets of joints perpendicular to bedding, formed in chert and sandstone. Simmons and Cruden (1980) proposed that the labyrinth was formed by the dilation of joints through the formation of ice wedges.

Another labyrinth in the Canadian Rocky Mountains was described by Stepanek (1992). Stepanek stated that “it is believed that this type of movement is more widespread than previously considered.” (p. 231). The rock slide occurs in Cretaceous sandstone interbedded with shale, with dips ranging between 9° and 24°. Stepanek (1992) concluded that ice wedging under periglacial conditions and high pore-pressures were probably involved in the development of this rock slide.

While Jackson (2002) has pointed out that the labyrinth type of movement occurs where resistant rock overlies less resistant rock, our example indicates all that is necessary is the presence of very thickly bedded, resistant rock with widely-spaced perpendicular joints.

Discussion

The northeast slope of the scarp area is a dip slope and the slope of the hanging valley into the Athabasca Valley is to the west, oblique to the dip direction of bedding (Fig. 3). For a translational slide to occur on bedding, slope movement needed to occur on the south scarp first to create kinematic freedom in the dip direction (Fig. 4). Once the most southerly blocks had moved to the south and the west, toppling over the crest of the west slope, blocks behind were then kinematically free to move out from the scarp, creating the freedom for the upgradient northern blocks to slide as well. Blocks that reached the break in slope have toppled over the slope, and subsequently have been deposited as talus along the slope or within the Maligne River.

We suggest that the south wall of the feature, the Rock Gardens, was formed by the collapse of a cave system. As Kruse (1980) discussed, the Maligne cave system is fed from Medicine Lake at the current time; springs that issue from this cave system occur along the Maligne River as well as at Beauvert Lake. As the cave system collapsed, blocks to the northeast would be kinematically free to slide, allowing other blocks further upslope to move, creating the labyrinth.

Figure 3

Cross-section A-A’ as marked on Figure 1, showing the labyrinth, colluvium and alluvial sediments.

Coupe transversale A-A’ (dont l’emplacement est indiqué à la fig. 1) montrant le labyrinthe, les colluvions et les sédiments alluviaux.

-> See the list of figures

Table I

Labyrinths in the Canadian Rocky Mountains

Labyrinths in the Canadian Rocky Mountains

-> See the list of tables

Figure 4

General trend of the slope break and resulting kinematically free blocks.

Orientation générale de la rupture de pente et des blocs libérés.

-> See the list of figures

In the rock labyrinth, blocks have slid from a scarp along bedding planes, or weak layers within the stratigraphy. Cruden and Hu’s (1988) study of the frictional properties of carbonates in the Rocky Mountains found that the friction angles of carbonates range from 21° to 41°. Dolostones such as those in the Palliser had lower angles of friction and were more brittle than limestones. Many blocks inclined at 26° are not sliding at present, indicating angles of friction at least this high. Thus translational sliding at this site required assisting forces such as water pressure, snow pressure, or ice wedge growth. It is thus likely that this rock labyrinth formed under periglacial conditions following the retreat of the Maligne and Athabasca glaciers (Mountjoy, 1974; Simmons and Cruden, 1980; and Stepanek, 1992). The blocks that did not experience sufficient water, frost or snow pressure to slide the entire distance to the break in the slope formed the labyrinth proper, which thus comprises some of the last blocks to move.

Conclusions

The rock labyrinth formed by the sliding of blocks along bedding planes initially triggered by the development of a collapsed cavern feature defining the south of The Sink. Movement of the rock within the labyrinth probably occurred post-glacially, under periglacial conditions with abundant water. Based on the sizes of the blocks moved in this slide, and the distance that these blocks were moved, abundant pressures would be required to drive the movement in this slide, which would take place over an extended time period, perhaps hundreds of years. The feature is no longer active, with the exception of occasional rock fall or rock topples from the steep slope south wall.

Appendices