Abstracts
Abstract
Although the importance of formative assessment has been recognized worldwide, the theoretical foundation is insufficiently captured within a broader sociocultural context that promotes teachers and students building an assessment culture. This study proposes a theoretical framework that supports the claim that formative assessment aims to accelerate an agentic process of transforming and improving the teaching–learning activity systems rather than helping teachers mold students with traditional values and cultural discourses. The characteristics of formative assessment were organized for each of the learning metaphors: acquisition, participation, and expansion. In this paper, assessment for expansion is defined as a form of formative assessment to facilitate expansive learning toward a process of making teaching–learning better, of which the functional core is sociocultural feedback with reference to situational criteria. Next, the theoretical discussions demonstrate that assessment for expansion emerges from making a third space and forming a culturally fitted tool for realistic and sustainable practical judgements. These conditions, which work within a continuum of problematic, ends-in-view, and expanded contexts, recognize the impact of assessments in associating a single student’s voice with a school- and community-wide problem. In conclusion, the possibilities and challenges of assessment for expansion are discussed from theoretical and practical perspectives.
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- Absolum, M., Lester, F., Hattie, J., Hipkins, R., & Reid, I. (2009). Directions for assessment in New Zealand: Developing students’ assessment capabilities. Ministry of Education, Wellington. https://assessment.tki.org.nz/Assessment-for-learning/Assessment-position-papers-readings-and-resources
- Adie, L., Addison, B., & Lingard, B. (2021). Assessment and learning: An in-depth analysis of change in one school’s assessment culture. Oxford Review of Education, 47(3), 404–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1850436
- Allal, L., & Ducrey, G. P. (2000). Assessment of—or in—the zone of proximal development. Learning and Instruction, 10, 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00025-0
- Arimoto, M. (2017). The prospect of educational assessment as a secret ingredient of effective pedagogy in the context of Japanese kizuki (with-it-ness) based on evidence-informed principles for effective teaching and learning. Annual Bulletin, Graduate School of Education, Tohoku University, 3, 10–35. http://hdl.handle.net/10097/00113174
- Asghar, M. (2013). Exploring formative assessment using cultural historical activity theory. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 4(2), 18–32.
- Baird, J., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: Fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 317–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337
- Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2018). From “seeing through” to “seeing with”: Assessment criteria and the myths of transparency. Frontiers in Education, 3(96), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00096
- Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
- Birenbaum, M. (2014). Conceptualizing assessment culture in school. In C. Wyatt-Smith, V. Klenowski, & P. Colbert (Eds.), The enabling power of assessment: Vol. 1. Designing assessment for quality learning (pp. 285–302). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5902-2_18
- Birenbaum, M. (2016). Assessment culture versus testing culture: The impact on assessment for learning. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 275–292). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_16
- Birenbaum, M., DeLuca, C., Earl, L., Heritage, M., Klenowski, V., Looney, A., Smith, K., Timperley, H., Volante, L., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2015). International trends in the implementation of assessment for learning: Implications for policy and practice. Policy Futures in Education, 13(1), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210314566733
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2003). In praise of educational research: Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192032000133721
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
- Bond, E., Woolcott, G., & Markopoulos, C. (2020). Why aren’t teachers using formative assessment? What can be done about it? Assessment Matters, 14, 112–136. https://doi.org/10.18296/am.0046
- Broadfoot, P. (1990). Towards Curssessment: The symbiotic relationship between curriculum and assessment. In N. Entwistle (Ed.), Handbook of educational ideas and practices (pp. 647–657). Routledge.
- Burner, T. (2019). Aligning assessment and learning using cultural-historical activity theory. Assessment Matters, 13, 91–112. https://doi.org/10.18296/am.0039
- Christodoulou, D. (2017). Making good progress? The future of assessment for learning. Oxford University Press.
- Clark, I. (2015). Formative assessment: Translating high-level curriculum principles into classroom practice. The Curriculum Journal, 26(1), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2014.990911
- Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109–1136. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20440
- Cole, M. (1985). The zone of proximal development: Where culture and cognition create each other. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 146–161). Cambridge University Press.
- Cowie, B. (2005). Pupil commentary on assessment for learning. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170500135921
- Cowie, B., Harrison, C., & Willis, J. (2018). Supporting teacher responsiveness in assessment for learning through disciplined noticing. The Curriculum Journal, 29(4), 464–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1481442
- Crossouard, B. (2012). Classroom assessment and education: Challenging the assumptions of socialisation and instrumentality. Education Inquiry, 3(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v3i2.22027
- Davis, A., Busick, K., Herbst, S., & Sherman, A. (2014). System leaders using assessment for learning as both the change and the change process: Developing theory from practice. The Curriculum Journal, 25(4), 567–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2014.964276
- DeLuca, C., Luu, K., Sun, Y., & Klinger, D. A. (2012). Assessment for learning in the classroom: Barriers to implementation and possibilities for teacher professional learning. Assessment Matters, 4, 5–29. https://doi.org/10.18296/am.0104
- Dewey, J. (1920). Reconstruction in philosophy. Holt and Company.
- Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. The Macmillan Company.
- Dewey, J. (1939). Theory of valuation. University of Chicago Press.
- Elwood, J., & Murphy, P. (2015). Assessment systems as cultural scripts: A sociocultural theoretical lens on assessment practice and products. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1021568
- Engeström, Y. (1991). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Multidisciplinary Newsletter for Activity Theory, 7/8, 14–15.
- Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
- Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139814744
- Engeström, Y. (2016). Studies in expansive learning: Learning what is not yet there. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316225363
- Engeström, Y. (2017). Expanding the scope of science education: An activity-theoretical perspective. In K. Hahl, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, A. Uitto, & J. Lavonen (Eds.), Cognitive and Affective Aspects in Science Education Research: Contributions from Science Education Research (Vol. 3, pp. 357–370). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_26
- Engeström, Y. (2020). Concept formation in the wild: Towards a research agenda. Éducation & Didactique, 14, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.4000/educationdidactique.6816
- Engeström, Y., & Miettinen, R. (1999). Introduction. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 1–16). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774
- Fleer, M. (2015). Developing an assessment pedagogy: The tensions and struggles in re-theorizing assessment from a cultural-historical perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(2), 224–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1015403
- Gipps, C. (2008). Sociocultural aspects of assessment. In H. Wynne (Ed.), Student assessment and testing (Vol. 1) (pp. 252–291). Sage.
- Gladovic, C., Tai, J. H., & Dawson, P. (2022). Qualitative approaches to researching evaluative judgement in pedagogical activities: A case study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(2), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1901854
- Gutiérrez, K. D., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 445–472. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.65.3.r16146n25h4mh384
- Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2009). The complexity of teachers’ conceptions of assessment: tensions between the needs of schools and students. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319745
- Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
- Hughes, G. (2014). Ipsative assessment: Motivation through marking progress. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137267221
- James, M. (2008). Assessment and learning. In S. Swaffield (Ed.), Unlocking assessment: Understanding for reflections and application (pp. 20–36). Routledge.
- James, M. (2017). (Re)viewing assessment: Changing lenses to refocus on learning. Assessment in Education Principles Policy & Practice, 24(3), 404–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1318823
- James, M., McCormick, R., Black, P., Carmichael, P., Drummond, M. J., Fox, A., MacBeath, J., Marshall, B., Pedder, D., Procter, R., Swaffield, S., Swann, J., & Wiliam, D. (2007). Improving learning how to learn: Classrooms, schools and networks. Routledge.
- Klenowski, V. (2012). Raising the stakes: The challenges for teacher assessment. The Australian Educational Researcher, 39(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-012-0057-9
- Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625510
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
- Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035003003
- Marshall, B., & Drummond, M. J. (2006). How teachers engage with Assessment for Learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520600615638
- Marx, K. (1867). Das kapital: Kritik der politischen oekonomie [Capital: A critique of political economy]. Verlag von Otto Meisner.
- McKnight, L., & Whitburn, B. (2020). Seven reasons to question the hegemony of Visible Learning. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 41(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1480474
- Miettinen, R. (2001) Artifact mediation in Dewey and in cultural-historical activity theory. Mind Culture and Activity, 8(4), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0804_03
- Muller, J. Z. (2018). The tyranny of metrics. Princeton University Press.
- Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559
- Nishizuka, K. (2020). A critical review of formative assessment research and practice in Japan. International Journal of Curriculum Development and Practice, 22(1), 15–47. https://doi.org/10.18993/jcrdaen.22.1_15
- Nishizuka, K. (2021). Formative assessment as a process of practical judgment: Return to theory of valuation by John Dewey. Japanese Journal of Evaluation Studies, 21(2), 117–130. http://evaluationjp.org/files/Vol21_No2.pdf
- Nishizuka, K. (2022a). How can assessment for learning be useful for self-regulated learning? Four approaches to change of assessment conceptions from individualistic to contextualistic. Pedagogy and the Human Sciences, 8(1). https://scholarworks.merrimack.edu/phs/vol8/iss1/2
- Nishizuka, K. (2022b). The role of asynchronous formative intervention in formative assessment practices: Focusing on the “contemporary society” subject committee as a third space. Japanese Association for Research on Activity Theory, 7, 17–41. http://kandai.sakura.ne.jp/jarat/wordpress_katsudo/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/JATR-7-02_nishiduka.pdf
- Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557–576. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074004557
- Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we go there, and where we are going. Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y
- Parr, J. M., & Timperley, H. S. (2016). Teachers and assessment: Enhancing assessment capability. In G. T. L. Brown, & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 95–108). Routledge.
- Pryor, J., & Crossouard, B. (2008). A sociocultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701476386
- Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
- Rogoff, B., Mistry, J., Goncu, A., & Mosier, C. (1993). Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(8), v–179. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166109
- Roth, W. M., & Radford, L. (2011). A cultural-historical perspective on mathematics teaching and learning. Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-564-2
- Rømer, T. A. (2019). A critique of John Hattie’s theory of Visible Learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(6), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1488216
- Sadler, D. R. (1985). The origins and functions of evaluative criteria. Educational Theory, 35(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1985.00285.x
- Sadler, D. R. (2020). Assessment tasks as curriculum statements: A turn to attained outcomes. The Japanese Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29, 91–109. https://doi.org/10.18981/jscs.29.0_91
- Sato, M. (2000). Essential properties and challenges of teachers’ competence in comprehending students’ learning: Centering on the qualitative method of evaluation for “integrated studies.” Japanese Association of School Education, 15, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.20576/bojase.KJ00008132130
- Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176193
- Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029007004
- Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3
- Thanh Pham, T. H., & Renshaw, P. (2015). Formative assessment in Confucian heritage culture classrooms: Activity theory analysis of tensions, contradictions and hybrid practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.886325
- Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120095780
- Valsiner, Y. (2007). Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. Sage Publication.
- van der Veer, R. (1996). The concept of culture in Vygotsky’s thinking. Culture & Psychology, 2, 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9600200302
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
- Webb, M., & Jones, J. (2009). Exploring tensions in developing assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903075925
- Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1pncrnd
- Wiliam, D. (2017). Assessment and learning: Some reflections. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 394–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1318108
- Wiliam, D. (2018). Commentary: How can assessment support learning? A response to Wilson and Shepard, Penuel, and Pellegrino. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 42–44. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/emip.12192
- Willis, J. (2010). Assessment for learning as a participative pedagogy. Assessment Matters, 2, 65–84. https://doi.org/10.18296/am.0079
- Willis, J., Adie, L., & Klenowski, V. (2013). Conceptualising teachers’ assessment literacies in an era of curriculum and assessment reform. Australian Educational Researcher, 40(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0089-9
- Willis, J., & Cowie, B. (2014). Assessment as a generative dance. In C. Wyatt-Smith, V. Klenowski, & P. Colbert (Eds.), Designing assessment for quality learning, pp. 23–37. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5902-2
- Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
- Wyatt-Smith, C., & Klenowski, V. (2013). Explicit, latent and meta-criteria: Types of criteria at play in professional judgement practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(1), 350–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.725030
- Yamazumi, K. (2021). Activity theory and collaborative intervention in education: Expanding learning in Japanese schools and communities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367823542