Abstracts
Abstract
A key step in understanding different ways of experiencing the world, consists in exploring the limits of the human mind and the languages we use to make sense of our surrounding worlds. The concept of boundary is central in this endeavor. When we think of a boundary in the broadest sense, we think of an entity (or event) demarcated from its surroundings. Whether these boundaries reflect the structure of the world or just the organizing activity of our mind is a matter of intense philosophical debate. In this paper, human spatial thinking is a starting point to further explore our interactions with and within our environment. I argue that biosemiotics offers the most suitable framework for doing so, as it integrates humans in the larger communication network flow. Yet the spatial aspect of communication has received only limited attention in the biosemiotic literature. Furthermore, basing myself on my recent crossover practice in art/science, I argue that an embodied-embedded approach is necessary to dissolve and redefine spatial categories, allowing the investigation and potential crossing of the boundaries of our perceptual worlds.
Keywords:
- Spatial Language,
- Biosemiotics,
- Multimodal Objects,
- Embodiment
Résumé
Une étape clé dans la compréhension des différentes façons d’expérimenter le monde, consiste à explorer les limites de l’esprit humain et les langages employés pour donner un sens aux mondes qui nous entourent. Le concept de frontière est central à cette entreprise. Lorsque nous pensons à une frontière au sens large, nous pensons à une entité (ou à un événement) démarquée de son milieu. À savoir si ces frontières reflètent la structure du monde ou si elles reflètent simplement l’activité organisatrice de notre esprit, est un sujet de débat philosophique intense. Dans cet article, la pensée spatiale humaine est le point de départ pour explorer plus avant notre interaction avec notre environnement. J’affirme que la biosémiotique offre le cadre le plus approprié pour y parvenir, puisqu’elle intègre les humains à même le flux des réseaux de communication. Pourtant, l’aspect spatial de la communication n’a reçu que peu d’attention dans la littérature biosémiotique. En outre, sur la base de ma pratique actuelle à l’intersection des arts et des sciences, je soutiens qu’une approche incorporée est nécessaire pour dissoudre et redéfinir des catégories spatiales, permettant ainsi d’investiguer et potentiellement de franchir les limites de nos mondes perceptuels.
Mots-clés :
- Langage spatial,
- biosémiotique,
- objets multimodaux,
- mode de réalisation
Appendices
Bibliography
- BAŞDOĜAN, Ç.; & BOWEN LOFTIN, R. (2009) “Multimodal Display Systems : Haptic, Olfactory, Gustatory, and Vestibular”. In Nicholson, D., Schmorrow, D., & Cohn, J. (eds.), The PSI Handbook of Virtual Environments for Training and Education : Developments for the Military and Beyond, Volume 2 : Components and Training Technologies. Westport, CT : Praeger Security International : 116-134.
- BINFORD, L. R. (1962) “Archaeology as Anthropology”. In American Antiquity (28)2 : 217-225.
- BIRNBAUM, D. (2008) The Hospitality of Presence : Problems of Otherness in Husserl’s Phenomenology. New York : Sternberg Press.
- BOUZY, B. (1995) “Toward Spatial Reasoning about ‘Natural’ Objects”. Online http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.20.512&rep=rep1&type=pdf
- BROWN, S.; GAO, X.; TISDELLE, L.; EICKHOFF, S. B.; & LIOTTI, M. (2011) “Naturalizing Aesthetics : Brain Areas for Aesthetic Appraisal across Sensory Modalities”. In NeuroImage Journal (58)1 : 250-258. doi : 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.012
- CABLITZ, G. H. (2008) “When “What” is “Where” : A Linguistic Analysis of Landscape Terms, Place Names and Body Part Terms in Marquesan (Oceanic, French Polynesia)”. In Language Sciences (30)2/3 : 200-226.
- CLIFTON, P. G.; CHANG, J. S.-K.; YEBOAH, G.; DOUCETTE, A.; CHANDRASEKHARAN, S.; NITSCHE, M.; & MAZALEK, A. (2016) “Design of Embodied Interfaces for Engaging Spatial Cognition”. In Cognitive Research : Principles and Implications 1(1) : 1-15.
- CHITTKA, L.; & BROCKMANN, A. (2005) “Perception Space – The Final Frontier”. In PLoS Biol (3)4 : e137. doi : 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030137
- CRITTENDEN, A. N. (2011) “The Importance of Honey Consumption in Human Evolution”. In Food and Foodways (19) 4 : 257-273. doi : 10.1080/07409710.2011.630618
- DEACON, T. (2010) “Excerpts from The Symbolic Species”. In Favareau, D., Essential Readings in Biosemiotics Anthology and Commentary. http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=763619
- EGENHOFER, M. J.; & GOLLEDGE, R. G. (Eds.) (1998) Spatial and Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Information Systems. New York : Oxford University Press.
- EVERAERT-DESMEDT, N. (2011) “Peirce’s Semiotics”. In Louis Hébert (dir.), Signo [online]. http://www.signosemio.com/peirce/semiotics.asp.
- FARINA, A. (2016) Soundscape Ecology. [S.l.] : Springer.
- FAVAREAU, D. (2010) Essential Readings in Biosemiotics Anthology and Commentary.Online http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=763619
- FRISCH, K. von (1970) The Dancing Bees : An Account of the Life and Senses of the Honey Bee. London : Methuen & Co.
- GALTON, A.; & MIZOGUCHI, R. (2009) “The Water Falls but the Waterfall Does Not Fall : New Perspectives on Objects, Processes and Events”. InApplied Ontology (4)2 : 71-107.
- GIBSON, J. J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston : Houghton Mifflin.
- GLASS, L. (2001) “Synchronization and Rhythmic Processes in Physiology”. In Nature (410) : 277-284.
- GRINDE, B.; & GRINDAL PATIL, G. (n.d.) “Biophilia : Does Visual Contact with Nature Impact on Health and Well-Being?”. In Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI).
- HARRINGTON, J. P. (1916) The Ethnography of the Tewa Indians Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. Washington : Smithsonian Institution : 29-636.
- HASKELL, D. G. (2017) The Songs of Trees, Stories from Nature’s Great Connections. Penguin/Random House.
- HEGARTY, M.; MONTELLO, D. R.; RICHARDSON, A. E.; ISHIKAWA, T.; & LOVELACE, K. (2006) “Spatial Abilities at Different Scales : Individual Differences in Aptitude-Test Performance and Spatial-Layout Learning”. In Intelligence (34)2 : 151–176. doi : 10.1016/j.intell.2005.09.005
- HIGUCHI, T. (1983) The Visual and Spatial Structure of Landscapes. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.
- HOFFMEYER, J. (2012) The Natural History of Intentionality : A Biosemiotic Approach. http://curapp02pl.unicph.domain:8080/portal/da/publications/the-natural-history-of-intentionality(8b3ea6c2-e2ad-4f33-bc37-ca12810466ce).html
- HOLOPAINEN, J.K.; & BLANDE, J.D. (2012) “Molecular Plant Volatile Communication”. Sensing in Nature. C. Lopez-Larea, Landes Bioscience and Springer Sciences.
- HOPE, J. (2010) “Umwelträume and Mulitsensory Integration. Mirror Perspectives on the Subject-Object Dichotomy”. In Biosemiotics (3) : 93-105.
- HOPFIELD, J.J. (1991) Olfactory Computation and Object Perception. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=52105
- HOROWITZ, S. S. (2013) The Universal Sense : How Hearing Shapes the Mind. New York, N.Y. : Bloomsbury.
- IRELAND, T. (2015) “The Spatiality of Being”. In Biosemiotics (8) : 381-401.
- KRAUSE, B. L. (1993) “The Niche Hypothesis : A Virtual Symphony of Animal Sounds, the Origins of Musical Expression and the Health of Habitats”. In The Soundscape Newsletter (June).
- KRAUSE, B.; & FARINA, A. (2016) “Using Ecoacoustic Methods to Survey the Impacts of Climate Change on Biodiversity”. In Biological Conservation Biological Conservation (195) 36 : 245-254.
- KRESS, G. (2010) Multimodality : A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London and New York : Routledge.
- LEVINSON, S. C. (2003) Space in Language and Cognition : Explorations in Cognitive Diversity (5). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
- LOTMAN, J.; & CLARK, W. (2005) “On the Semiosphere”. In Sign Systems Studies (33)1 : 205-226.
- MAJID, A.; BOWERMAN, M.; KITA, S.; HAUN, D. B. M.; & LEVINSON, S. C. (2004). “Can Language Restructure Cognition? The Case for Space”. In TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences (8)3 : 108-114.
- MARK, D. M.; & TURK, A.G.. (2003) “Landscape Categories in Yindjibarndi : Ontology, Environment, and Language”. In M. W. Werner Kuhn & Sabine Timpf (Ed.), Spatial Information Theory : Foundations of Geographic Informations Systems, International Conference, COSIT 2003, Kartause Ittingen, Switzerland, September 24-28, 2003, Proceedings (2825) : 398. Berlin : Springer.
- MARK, D. M.; TURK, A.G.; BURENHULT, N.; & STEA D. (Eds.) (2011) Landscape in Language : Transdisciplinary Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company : 381-393.
- McFREDERICK, Q.S.; FUENTES, J.D.; ROULSTON, T.; KAHILANKAL, J.C.; & LERDAU, M. (2009) “Effects of Air Pollution on Biogenic Volatiles and Ecological Interactions”. In Oecologia (160) : 411-420.
- MILLENIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT, (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being : Synthesis. Washington DC : Island Press. Available here : https://www.milleniumassessment.org/documents/document.456.aspx.pdf (Accessed May 2019).
- PALMER, B. (2015) “Topography in Language. Absolute Frame of Reference and the Topographic Correspondence Hypothesis”. In R. de Busser & R. LaPolla eds. Language Structure and Environment. London : Benjamins.
- PICKERING, J. (2005) “On Whitehead, Embodied Cognition and Biosemiotics”. InChromatikon : Annales de la philosophie en procès / Yearbook of Philosophy in Process (1) : 195-215.
- SCHAFER, R. M. (1994) The Soundscape : Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. Rochester, Vt.; [United States] : Destiny Books; Distributed to the book trade in the United States by American International Distribution Corp.
- SMITH, B. (1996) “Mereotopology : A Theory of Parts and Boundaries”. In Data and Knowlegde Engineering (20) : 287-303.
- SMITH, L. B.; & SHEYA, A. (2010) “Is Cognition Enough to Explain Cognitive Development?”. In TOPS, Topics in Cognitive Science (2)4 : 725-735.
- SPLIVALLO, R.; KARLOVSKY, P.; OTTONELLO, S.; & MELLO, A. (2011) “Truffle Volatiles : From Chemical Ecology to Aroma Biosynthesis”. In New Phytologist (189)3 : 688-699.
- STEIN, B. E.; & MEREDITH, M. A. (1993) The Merging of the Senses. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.
- STROGATZ, S.H.; & STEWART, I. (1993) “Coupled Oscillators and Biological Synchronization”. In Scientific American (December) : 102-109.
- TURIN, L. (1996). “A Spectroscopic Mechanism for Primary Olfactory Reception”. In Chemical Senses (21)6 : 773-791.
- TVERSKY, B. (2003) “Navigating by Mind and Body”. In C. Freska, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition III (2685) : 1-10. Heidelberg : Springer.
- VAN DER ELST, J. (2010) “Exploring Cognitive Landscapes : Toward an Understanding of the Relationship between Space/Time Conceptualization and Cultural Material Expression”. Cyberarchaeology, ed. M. Forte, BAR International Series, Oxford : England : Archaeopress.
- VAN DER ELST, J. (2016) Contemplating Greenness. Online essay, Noema Lab Science and Technology. www.noemalab.org
- VAN DER ELST, J.; RICHARDS-RISSETTO, H.; & DIAZ KOMMONEN, L. (2018) “Rural Sense : Value, Heritage, and Sensory Landscapes, a Design Approach”. In Landscape Review.
- van der elst, J. (Forthcoming) “Surfing the Semiosphere : Encounter in Kilpisjärvi”. Notes on Field Notes Series. CAA Art Journal Open.
- VON UEXKÜLL, J. (2010) “The Theory of Meaning”. In Favareau, D. Essential Readings in Biosemiotics Anthology and Commentary. http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=763619
- WILSON, A.; GOLONKA, S. (2013) “Embodied Cognition is Not What You Think It Is”. In Frontiers in Psychology (4).