Documents found

  1. 191.

    Published in: Internationales observation analyse et perspectives , 2004 , Pages 367-379

    2004

  2. 192.

    Published in: Internationales observation analyse et perspectives , 2004 , Pages 617-630

    2004

  3. 193.

    Published in: Enfants d’aujourd’hui, diversité des contextes, pluralité des parcours , 2002 , Pages 20-34

    2002

  4. 194.

    Groupe de recherche sur l'intégration continentale (GRIC)

    2006

  5. 195.

    Bréchet, Jean-Pierre, Journé-Michel, Hélène and Schieb-Bienfait, Nathalie

    Figures de la conception et de l'innovation dans l'artisanat

    Article published in Revue internationale P.M.E. (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 21, Issue 2, 2008

    Digital publication year: 2009

    More information

    AbstractIf design and innovation have been largely studied by researchers in management, this question is relatively less adressed in the craft context. This article deals with the design and innovation figures, identified after three years of work within a regional club associating both different craftsmen and researchers.Based on an empirical study of 15 craft firms in several sectors (sometimes traditional sector) results put into light several various shapes and stages in design and innovation processes.After the presentation of the different theoretical approaches of design and innovation and their limits in the craft context, we expose the research methodology and this original approach of regional club. Afterwards, the proposal of a typology of design and innovation couple is discussed and considered to characterize the cratfman as an original figure of project manager.

    Keywords: Conception, Innovation, Artisanat, Projet, Management, Entreprise artisanale

  6. 196.

    Other published in Assurances et gestion des risques (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 74, Issue 2, 2006

    Digital publication year: 2022

    More information

    We clarify the foundations of project evaluation under multiple risk sources and we showthat the way the NPV method is typically applied in most firms and organizations violatessome fundamental principles of value creation such as the additivity and absence of arbitrageprinciples. Project evaluation must be done through (i) decomposing the projectcash flows into components corresponding to the different sources of risk and (ii) obtainingthe present value of each component with a specific risk-adjusted discount rate. Thevalue of the project is obtained as the sum of the present values so obtained. Alternatively,the different components can be corrected for their respective risk to obtain theircertainty equivalents. The value of the project is then obtained as the sum of those certaintyequivalents discounted at the unique, observable, identical, risk free rate.

    Keywords: évaluation de projet, risques multiples, project evaluation, multiple risks

  7. 197.

    Published in: Internationales observation analyse et perspectives , 2004 , Pages 93-107

    2004

  8. 198.

    Tardif, Carole, Klein, Juan-Luis and Lévesque, Benoît

    Le développement régional aux États-Unis et en Europe : Neuf études de cas

    ARUC-ÉS

    2001

  9. 199.

    Published in: Population et travail, dynamique démographique et travail , 2006 , Pages 1283-1306

    2006

  10. 200.

    LeBlanc, Patrice, Jean, Bruno, Lafontaine, Danielle and Marceau, Richard

    Le modèle et les indicateurs de suivi et d'évaluation du dispositif du Pacte rural - Rapport no.1

    Centre de recherche sur le développement territorial (CRDT), en collaboration avec le Centre de recherche et d'expertise en évalutaion (CREXE)

    2007