Documents found

  1. 1.

    Article published in Annales d'Ethiopie (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 16, Issue 1, 2000

    Digital publication year: 2009

  2. 2.

    Note published in Gallia préhistoire (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 39, Issue 1, 1997

    Digital publication year: 2010

  3. 3.

    Review published in Revue archéologique de l'ouest (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 17, Issue 1, 2000

    Digital publication year: 2011

  4. 4.

    Review published in Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 95, Issue 4, 1998

    Digital publication year: 2009

  5. 5.

    Review published in Journal des africanistes (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 73, Issue 2, 2003

    Digital publication year: 2008

  6. 6.

    Article published in Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 93, Issue 3, 1996

    Digital publication year: 2019

    More information

    ABSTRACT Building or rebuilding a megalithic monument... A few ideas and reminders concerning a demanding restoration policy that should reach a genuine compromise between optimal reasoned perservation and the many- sided complicated stakes of an in situ presentation, will be discussed first. Next, because of the recent arrival in France of "experimental megalithic building", the author will try to emphasize the potential of what could, subject to certain conditions conditionally, become a promising aspect of archaeological research development.

  7. 7.

    Review published in Revue archéologique du Centre de la France (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 17, Issue 1-2, 1978

    Digital publication year: 2010

  8. 9.

    Article published in Gallia préhistoire (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 44, Issue 1, 2002

    Digital publication year: 2013

    More information

    This article presents the results of six years of excavation at Tumulus C in the megalithic cemetery of Prissé-la-Charrière (Deux- Sèvres). This is a trapezoidal mound 115 metres long, 30 metres wide and 4 metres high, that was constructed in several stages. The earliest stage that has so far been documented consists of a small funerary monument measuring 7.2 metres east-west and 8.8 metres wide. It was built largely of earth, and contained a cist open on one side and enclosed within a circular dry-stone mass. At a later stage, the entrance to the cist was blocked and the monument extended towards the east to form a long mound 23 metres in length. This mound was entirely surrounded by an encircling ditch. Later still, the 100-metre trapezoidal long mound was built, enclosing the earlier long mound within its western terminal. This extended mound contains at least one megalithic chamber of quadrangular plan, accessed by a passage opening from the northern façade approximately 1/3 of the distance from the western terminal. The chamber has yielded Middle Neolithic material. The significance of these discoveries are discussed in relation to existing understanding of the megalithic monuments in this region of France, with particular regard to the question of origins.

  9. 10.

    Anfray, Francis

    Stèles aux épées

    Article published in Annales d'Ethiopie (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 12, Issue 1, 1982

    Digital publication year: 2009