Résumés
Résumé
Nous avons examiné la structure des programmes de maîtrise agréés par l’American Library Association dans le but de déterminer la place accordée à l’organisation des connaissances (OC) comme discipline et comme matière au sein de la formation contemporaine en sciences de l’information. Les données montrent que l’OC demeure bien visible dans la majorité des programmes, sous forme de cours obligatoires et de cours au choix entièrement ou partiellement consacrés au catalogage descriptif, à la classification et à l’utilisation de métadonnées. Nous relevons quelques tendances à surveiller : l’élimination récente dans quelques programmes du cours obligatoire en OC, le fait qu’un cours en OC sur trois, bien que décrit dans l’annuaire des cours, n’ait pas été mis à l’horaire depuis au moins trois ans, et le fait que les deux-tiers des responsables de cours en OC ne soient pas des spécialistes du domaine.
Abstract
We examined the structure of American Library Association-accredited master’s degree programs to determine the place of Knowledge Organization (KO) as a discipline and subject within contemporary LIS education. The data show that KO remains prominent in most programmes, in the form of mandatory courses and elective courses devoted entirely or partly to descriptive cataloguing, classification and the use of metadata. A few trends to watch out for are the recent elimination of the mandatory course in KO in a few programmes, the fact that one in three KO courses, although described in the course directory, has not been scheduled for at least three years, and the fact that two-thirds of KO course leaders are not KO specialists.
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Alajmi, B., ur Rehman, S. (2016). Knowledge Organization Trends in Library and Information Education : Assessment and Analysis. Education for Information, 32 : 411-420. doi : 10.1108/LR-03-2016-0028
- American Library Association. (2021). ALA Core competencies for librarianship. Chicago, ALA. www.ala.org/educationcareers/sites/ala.org.educationcareers/files/content/education/Draft%20-%20ALA%20Core%20Competences%202021%20Update.pdf.
- Association for Library Collections and Technical Services, Cataloging Competencies Task Force. (2017). Core Competencies for Cataloging and Metadata Professional Librarians. Chicago, ALCTS. alair.ala.org/bitstream/handle/11213/7853/Core%20Competencies%20Cataloging%20Metadata%20Professional.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
- Hider, P. (2018). The Terminological and Disciplinary Origins of Information and Knowledge Organization. Education for Information, 34 : 142-148.
- Hjorland, B. (2016). Knowledge Organization (KO). Knowledge Organization, 43 : 475-484.
- Hudon, M. (2010). Teaching Classification, 1990-2010. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 48(1) : 64-82. doi : 10.1080/ 01639370903356370
- Hudon, M. (2011). Teaching Classification in the 21st Century. Knowledge Organization, 38 : 342-361.
- Hudon, M. (2014). KO and Classification Education in the Light of Benjamin Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning Objectives. Dans Knowledge Organization in the Twenty-First Century : Between Historical Patterns and Future Prospects : Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the International Society for Knowledge Organization(ISKO 2014), Krakow, Poland, 19-22 May 2014. Wurzburg, Ergon, 524-531.
- Joudrey, D., McGinnis, R. (2014). Graduate Education for Information Organization, Cataloging, and Metadata. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 52(5) : 506-550. doi :10.1080/01639374.2014.911236
- Kiel, E. (1993). Further Education in Knowledge Organization : Basic Didactic Considerations. Knowledge Organization 20 : 71-76.
- Krathwhol, D.R. (2005). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy : An Overview. Theory into practice, 41(4) : 212-218.
- Normore, L. (2012). Here Be Dragons : A Wayfinding Approach to Teaching Cataloging. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50 : 172-188. doi :10.1080/01639374.2011.651192
- Snow, K. (2019). Shifting Sands and the Prophet’s Dream : Exploring the Future of Information Organization Education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 60(2) : 139-151.
- Stortz, M. (2012). Academism versus Professionalism in LIS Programs. Public Services Quarterly, 8 : 86-90. doi :10.1080/15228959.2012. 650565