Résumés
Abstract
Mobile devices are increasingly coming to penetrate people's daily lives. Mobile learning (m-learning) is viewed as key to the coming era of electronic learning (e-learning). In the meantime, the use of mobile devices for learning has made a significant contribution to delivering education among higher education students worldwide. However, while m-learning is being widely adopted in developed countries, the adoption of such an approach in developing countries is still immature and underdeveloped. Developing countries are facing several challenges and lagging behind in terms of adopting m-learning in higher education. Thus, this paper explores the factors that have an impact on students’ intentions and readiness to adopt m-learning in higher education in Jordan. Based on the data collected from the field, we examine Jordanian students' requirements and preferences in terms of m-learning design, and we also investigate their concerns about adopting m-learning. This empirical study collected data from students using a paper-based questionnaire. The results reveal that students' intentions to adopt m-learning is influenced by several factors that include the relative advantage, complexity, social influence, perceived enjoyment, and the self-management of learning. By providing a picture of students' willingness to adopt m-learning, this study offers useful and beneficial implications for developers of m-learning applications and for educational providers to guide the design and implementation of comprehensive m-learning systems.
Keywords:
- mobile learning,
- m-learning adoption,
- e-learning,
- technology acceptance,
- perceived enjoyment,
- self-management of learning,
- developed countries
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Abar, B., & Loken, E. (2010). Self-regulated learning and self-directed study in a pre-college sample. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(1), 25-29.
- Abbasi, M., Tarhini, A., & Hassouna, M. (2015). Social, organizational, demography and individuals' technology acceptance behaviour: a conceptual model. European Scientific Journal, 11(9), 48-76.
- Abu-al-aish, A., & Love, S. (2013). Factors influencing students' acceptance of m-learning: An investigation in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(5), 83-108.
- Al-Adwan, A. (2015). Exploring physicians' behavioural intention toward the adoption of electronic health records: an empirical study from Jordan. The International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management, 15(2), 89-111.
- Al Adwan, A. (2017). Case study and grounded theory: a happy marriage? An exemplary application from healthcare informatics adoption research. International Journal of Electronic Healthcare, 9(4), 294-318.
- Al-Adwan, A. S., Al-Adwan, A., & Berger, H. (2018). Solving the mystery of mobile learning adoption in higher education. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 16(1), 24-49.
- Al-Adwan, A., Al-Adwan, A., & Smedley, J. (2013). Exploring students' acceptance of e-learning using Technology Acceptance Model in Jordanian universities. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 9(2), 4-18.
- Al-Adwan, A., & Smedley, J. (2012). Implementing e-learning in the Jordanian higher educationsystems: Factors affecting impact. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 121-135.
- Ali, R., & Arshad, M. (2016). Perspectives of students' behavior towards mobile learning (M-learning) in Egypt: an extension of the UTAUT model. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 6(4), 1109-1114.
- AlKailani, M. (2016). Factors affecting the adoption of internet banking in Jordan: An extended TAM model. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 10(1), 39-52
- Almarabeh, T., & Mohammad, H. (2013). E-learning in the Jordanian higher education system: Strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats. Journal of American Science, 9(3), 281-287.
- Almasri, A. (2015). Readiness and mobile learning process for higher education students in Jordanian universities. International Journal of Multidisplinary Research, 5(1), 85-96.
- Arpaci, I. (2014). A comparative study of the effects of cultural differences on the adoption of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 699-712.
- Aypay, A., Celik, H., & Aypay, A. (2012). Technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers in turkey. The Turkish Online of Educational Technology, 11(4), 264-272.
- Callum, K. (2010). Attitudes of educators to the introduction of mobile technology. Retrieved from http://www.citrenz.ac.nz/conferences/2010/papers10/139.pdf
- Callum, K., & Jeffrey, L. (2013). The influence of students' ICT skills and their adoption of mobile learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 303-314.
- Callum, K., Jeffrey, L., & Kinshuk, I. (2014). Factors impacting teachers' adoption of mobile learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13(1), 141-162.
- Carte, T., & Russell, C. (2003). In pursuit of moderation: nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 479-501.
- Celik, H. (2016). Customer online shopping anxiety the unified theory of acceptance and use technology (UTAUT) framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics , 28(2), 278-307.
- Celik, I., Sahin, I., & Aydin, M. (2014). Reliability and validity study of the mobile learning adoption scale developed based on the diffusion of innovations theory. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(4), 300-316.
- Cheng, Y. (2014). Exploring the intention to use mobile learning: the moderating role of personal innovativeness. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 16(1), 40-61.
- Concannon, F., Flynn, A., & Compbell, M. (2005). What campus-based students think about the quality and benefits of e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 501-512.
- Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 139-339.
- Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.
- Deb, S. (2011). Effective distance learning in developing countries using mobile and multimedia technology. International of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 6(2), 33-40
- Farley, H., Murphy, A., & Rees, S. (2013, December). Revisiting the definition of Mobile Learning. In Proceedings of the 30th Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Conference (ASCILITE 2013) (pp. 283-287). Macquarie University.
- Hadi, F., & Kishik, A. (2014). Acceptance of mobile learning among university students in Malysia. Journal of Computing and organizational Dynamics, 1(1), 1-14.
- Hair, F., Hult, G., & Ringle, M. (2013). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Hair, J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414-433.
- Hassan, U., Nawaz, M., Syed, T., Arfeen, M., Naseem, A., & Noor, S. (2015). Investigating students' behavioural intention towards adoption of mobile learning in higher education instructions of Pakistan. Technical Journal, 20(3), 34-47.
- Hossain, M., & El Saddik, A. (2008). A biologically inspired multimedia content repurposing system in heterogenous environments. Multimedia Systems, 14(3), 135-143.
- Huang, R. (2014). Exploring the moderating role of self-management of learning in mobile English learning. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 255-267.
- Iqbal, S., & Qureshi, I. (2012). M-learning adoption: A perspective from a developing country. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 148-164.
- Jackman, G. (2014). Investigating the factors influencing students' accepting mobile learning: the cave hill campus experience. Caribbean Educational Research Journal, 2(2), 14-32.
- Jambulingam, M. (2013). Behavioural intention to adopt mobile technology among tertiary students. World Applied Sciences Journal, 22(9), 1262-1271.
- Joo, Y., Lim, K., & Lim, E. (2014). Investigating the structural relationship among perceived innovation attributes, intention to use and actual use of mobile learning in an online university in South Korea. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 427-439.
- Jung, H. (2014). Ubiquitous learning: determinants impacting learners' satisfaction and performance with smartphones. Language learning & technology, 18(3), 97-119.
- Koufteros, A. (1999). Testing a model of pull production: A paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modelling. Journal of operations Managemen t, 17(1), 467-488.
- Liaw, S., Hatala, M., & Huang, H. (2010). Investigating acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: based on activity theory approach. Computers and Education, 54(2), 446-454.
- Liew, B.T., Kang, M., Yoo, E., & You, J. (2013). Investigating the determinants of mobile learning acceptance in Korea. In J. Herrington, A. Couros, & V. Irvine (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2013 (pp. 1424-1430). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- Liu, Y. (2008). An adoption model for mobile learning. In Proceeding for the IADIS international Conference e-Commerce. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Liu, Y., Han, S., & Li, H. (2010). Understanding the factors driving m-learning adoption: a literature review. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(4), 210-116.
- Lu, J., Chun-Chun-Sheng, Y., & Chang, L. (2005). Facilitating conditions, wireless trust and adoption intention. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(1), 17-24.
- Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Computer & Education, 68(1), 76-85.
- Masrek, M. N. (2015. May 12th - 15th). Predictors of mobile learning adoption: The case of Universiti Teknologi MARA. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT), Jordan.
- Mojtahed, R., Nunes, J., & Peng, G. (2011. July 20). The role of the technology acceptance model in information systems research. In Proceedings of the IADIS International workshop on information systems research trends, approaches and methodologies (ISRTAM), Italy.
- Mtebe, J., & Raisamo, R. (2014). Investigating students' behavioral intention to adopt and use mobile learning in higher education in East Africa. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 10(3), 4-20.
- Nassuora, A. (2013). Students' acceptance of mobile learning for higher education in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Learning Management Systems, 1(1), 1-9.
- Osman, M., El-Hussein, M., & Cronje, J. (2010). Defining mobile learning in the higher education landscape. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 12-21.
- Poong, Y., Yamaguchi, S., & Takada, J. (2016). Investigating the drivers of mobile learning acceptance among young adults in the world heritage town of Luang Prabang, Loas. Information Development, 33(1), 57-71.
- Prajapati, M., & Patel, J. (2014). The factors influencing in mobile learning adoption: A literature review. International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering and Management, 3(9), 133-138.
- Rogers, E. (2005). Diffusion of innovation. New York: Free Press.
- Sahin, I. (2006). Detailed review of Rogers' diffusion of diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology-related students based on Rogers' theory. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 14-23.
- Sarrab, M., Al Shibli, I., & Badursha, N. (2016). An empirical study of factors driving the adoption of mobile learning in Omani higher education. International Review of research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4), 331-349.
- Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. (2011). Multi-group analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: alternative methods and empirical results. In M. Sarstedt, M. Schwaiger, & C. R. Taylor (Eds.) Measurement and research methods in international marketing: Advances in international marketing (vol. 22, pp. 195-218). United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Seliaman, M., & Al-Turki, M. (2012). Mobile learning adoption in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Computer, Electronical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering, 6(9), 1129-1131.
- Shaukat, M., & Zafar, J. (2010). Impact of sociological and organisational factors on information technology adoption: An analysis of selected Pakistani companies. European Journal of Social Sciences, 13(2), 305-320.
- Shorfuzzaman, M., & Alhussein, M. (2016). Modeling learners' readiness to adopt mobile learning: A perspective from a GCC higher education institution. Mobile Information Systems, 1(1), 1-10.
- Smith, J., Murphy, K., & Manhoney, S. (2003). Towards identifying factors underlying readiness for online learning: an exploratory study. Distance Education, 24(1), 57-67.
- Tabor, S. (2016). Making mobile learning work: Student perceptions and implementation factors. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice. 15(1), 75-98
- Telecommunication Regulatory Commission. (2016). Telecom markets statistics and surveys. Retrieved from http://www.trc.gov.jo/Pages/viewpage.aspx?pageID=1006
- Thomas, T., Singh, L., & Gaffar, K. (2013). The utility of the UTAUT model in explaining mobile learning adoption in higher education in Guyana. International Journal of Educational and Development using Information and Communication technology, 9(3), 71-85.
- Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ. The International Review of Research in Open and Distrusted Learning, 8(2), 129-138.
- Ugur, N., Koc, T., & Koc, M. (2016). An analysis of mobile learning acceptance by college students. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies, 6(2), 2146-7463.
- Venkatesh, V. (1999). Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS quarterly, 23(2), 239-260.
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davies, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
- Wang, S., Wu, C., & Wang, Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92-118.
- Wong, K. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1-32.
- Yang, S. (2013). Understanding undergraduate students' adoption of mobile learning model: a perspective of extended UTAUT2. Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 8(10), 969-979.
- Zou, X., & Zhang, X. (2013). Effect of different score reports of web-based formative test on students' self-regulated learning. Computers & Education, 66(1), 54-63.