Abstracts
Abstract
Background: While many Area of Focused Competency (AFC) Diplomas are available to those who have completed Pediatric residency training, it is not known which competencies are enhanced within each AFC discipline. Our objective was to determine which CanMEDS roles were targeted by existing AFCs available to those who have completed Pediatric residency training and identify gaps within CanMEDs roles that may be fulfilled by the development of new AFCs.
Methods: A qualitative study was undertaken using document analysis methodology to compare CanMEDS competencies across AFCs available to those with Royal College examination eligibility or certification in Pediatrics. RCPSC Competency Training Requirements documents were used to compare and contrast the competencies in each AFC with competencies established in Pediatric residency training. Key and Enabling Competencies were compared for each CanMEDS role to identify differences.
Results: Ten AFCs were identified with eligibility requirements including Royal College examination eligibility or certification in Pediatrics. All 10 AFCs included at least one new Medical Expert competency, for a total of 42 unique competencies in this role across all AFCs. The Scholar role had only 10 new competencies across seven AFCs, while only one AFC added a single unique competency in the Collaborator role.
Conclusions: The majority of new competencies contributed by AFCs lie within the CanMEDS role of Medical Expert. The Scholar and Collaborator roles have the least differences when comparing competencies of existing AFCs to those competencies established in Pediatric residency training. Developing additional AFCs that offer advanced skills in these roles may help close this gap within the discipline of Pediatrics.
Résumé
Contexte : Bien que de nombreux diplômes de domaines de compétence ciblée (DCC) soient accessibles aux personnes ayant terminé leur résidence en pédiatrie, nous ne savons pas quelles sont les compétences qui sont approfondies dans chaque discipline de DCC. Notre objectif était de déterminer les rôles CanMEDS visés par les DCC actuellement accessibles aux personnes ayant terminé leur résidence en pédiatrie et de repérer les lacunes dans les rôles CanMEDS qui pourraient être comblées par l’élaboration de nouveaux DCC.
Méthodes : Nous avons réalisé une étude qualitative au moyen d’analyse de documents pour comparer les compétences CanMEDS dans les DCC ouverts aux personnes admissibles à l’examen du Collège royal ou ayant une certification en pédiatrie. Les documents sur les exigences de formation du CRMCC ont été utilisés pour comparer les compétences de chaque DCC et les compétences visées dans le cadre de la formation postdoctorale en pédiatrie. Les compétences clés et les compétences habilitantes ont été comparées pour chaque rôle CanMEDS afin de repérer les différences.
Résultats : Nous avons trouvé 10 DCC dont les conditions d’admissibilité comprennent l’admissibilité à l’examen du Collège royal ou la certification en pédiatrie. Chacun de ces 10 DCC comprenait au moins une nouvelle compétence d’expert médical et un total de 42 nouvelles compétences propres à ce rôle ont été répertoriées pour l’ensemble des DCC. Pour le rôle d’érudit, nous n’avons trouvé que 10 nouvelles compétences dans sept programmes de DCC, et pour celui de collaborateur, il n’y a qu’une nouvelle compétence dans un programme de DCC.
Conclusions : La majorité des nouvelles compétences développées dans les DCC relèvent du rôle CanMEDS d’expert médical. Les rôles d’érudit et de collaborateur présentent le moins de différences lorsqu’on compare les compétences ciblées dans les DCC existants et celles visées dans le cadre de la formation postdoctorale en pédiatrie. La création de DCC supplémentaires permettant l’acquisition de compétences plus poussées dans ces rôles pourrait contribuer à combler cette carence au sein de la discipline de la pédiatrie.
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Area of Focused Competence (AFC) diploma. Royalcollege.ca. 2022 Available from: https://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/credentials-exams/exam-eligibility/areas-focussed-competence-afc-diploma-e [Accessed on Mar 3, 2022].
- The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Accreditation of Areas of Focused Competence (AFC) programs. Royalcollege.ca. 2022. Available from: https://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/accreditation-pgme-programs/accreditation-areas-focussed-competence-afc-programs-e. [Accessed on Mar 3, 2022].
- The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Discipline recognition: Areas of Focused Competence (AFC) programs. Royalcollege.ca. 2022. Available from: https://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/specialty-discipline-recognition/categories/discipline-recognition-areas-focused-competence-afc-programs-e. [Accessed on Mar 3, 2022].
- The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. New AFC accreditation system. Royalcollege.ca. 2022. Available from: https://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/accreditation-pgme-programs/areas-of-focused-competence-accreditation-system-e. [Accessed on Mar 3, 2022].
- The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Information by discipline. Royalcollege.ca. 2022 Available from: https://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/ibd-search-e [Accessed on Mar 3, 2022].
- Get proofed. Research paradigms: explanations and examples Getproofed.com. 2022. Available from: https://getproofed.com.au/writing-tips/research-paradigms-explanation-and-examples/ [Accessed on Nov 30, 2022].
- Bowen GA. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J. 3 August 2009;9(2):27-40.
- Rohwer A, Schoonees A, Young T. Methods used and lessons learnt in conducting document reviews of medical and allied health curricula – a key step in curriculum evaluation. BMC Med Ed 2 November 2014;14(1):236.
- Dalglish SL, Khalid H, McMahon SA. Document analysis in health policy research: the READ approach. Health Pol Planning. 11 November 2020;35(10):1424-31.
- O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
- Al Maawali A, Puran A, Schwartz S, Johnstone J, Bismilla Z. The current state of general Pediatric fellowships in Canada. Pediatrics & child health. 2021;26(6):353-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxaa136
- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71