The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of how open universities depict their current institutional engagement in open educational practices. In view of the growth of programming for non-traditional students by conventional universities, particularly through online learning and increasing interest in open educational practices, the intention is to gain a better understanding of the unique contributions currently made, or potentially to be made, by open universities in comparison to conventional universities. The study is conducted through a content analysis of open university websites, exploring key themes related to access-oriented open educational practices derived from terms and related concepts in relevant literature. With the growth of distance education, online learning, and other emerging access-oriented open educational practices in traditional higher education, open universities should be uniquely situated to provide visible leadership in these domains. The open university website content analysis explores the extent to which this is the case.
- distance learning,
- open universities,
- open educational practices,
- online learning
Download the article in PDF to read it.
- Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Retrieved from https://hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/ReviewoftheOERMovement.pdf
- Commonwealth of Learning. (2018). A government policy development template to progress effective implementation of open educational resources (OER). Retrieved from http://oasis.col.org/handle/11599/2336
- Contact North. (2018). Searchable directory of more than 65 Open universities worldwide. Retrieved from https://teachonline.ca/tools-trends/universities
- Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 15-34. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
- Daniel, J., Kanwar, A., & Uvalic-Trumbic, S. (2009). Breaking higher education's iron triangle: Access, cost, and quality. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 41(2), 30-35. Retrieved from http://dspace.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/1442/2009_DanileKanwarUvalicTrumbic_BreakingIronTriangle_Transcript.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- Hanover Research. (2015). 2016 Trends in higher education marketing, enrollment, and technology. Retrieved from http://www.ct.edu/files/pdfs/workgroup-report-marketing-trends.pdf
- Harris, J., & Wihak, C. (2018). The recognition of non-formal education in higher education: Where are we now, and are we learning from experience? International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 33(1), n.p.
- Hasim, M. S., Hashim, A. E., Ariff, N. R. M., Sapeciay, Z., & Abdullah, A. S. (2018, February). Commitment to sustainability: A content analysis of website for university organisations. In S. Salleh & N. Yusuwan (Eds.), IOP conference series: Earth and environmental science (pp. 1-8). Bristol: IOP Publishing.
- Lane, A. (2009). The impact of openness on bridging educational digital divides. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(5), 1-12. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v10i5.637
- Li, K. C., & Wong, B. Y. Y. (2018). Revisiting the definitions and implementation of flexible learning. In K. C. Li, K. S. Yuen, & B. T. M. Wong (Eds.), Innovations in open and flexible education (pp. 3-13). Singapore: Springer.
- Li, K. C., Yuen, K. S., & Wong, B. T. M. (Eds.). (2018). Innovations in open and flexible education. Springer, Singapore.
- Mishra, S. (2017). Open educational resources: Removing barriers from within. Distance Education, 38(3), 369-380. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2017.1369350
- Orr, D., Weller, M., & Farrow, R. (2018). Report: Models for online, open, flexible and technology enhanced higher education across the globe–a comparative analysis. OER Hub. Retrieved from http://oerhub.net/data/report-models-for-online-open-flexible-and-technology-enhanced-higher-education/
- Peter, S., & Deimann, M. (2013). On the role of openness in education: A historical reconstruction. Open Praxis, 5(1), 7-14. doi: 10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.23
- Schuetze, H. G., & Slowey, M. (2002). Participation and exclusion: A comparative analysis of non-conventional students and lifelong learners in higher education. Higher Education, 44(3-4), 309-327. doi: 10.1023/A:1019898114335
- Shale, D. (1987). Innovation in international higher education: The open universities. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 2(1), 7-24.
- Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17), 137-146. Retrieved from https://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17
- Subotzky, G. & Prinsloo, P. (2011). Turning the tide: A socio critical model and framework for improving student success in open distance learning at the University of South Africa. Distance Education, 32(2), 177-193. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2011.584846
- Tait, A. (2008). What are open universities for? Open Learning, 23(2), 85-93. doi: 10.1080/02680510802051871
- Taylor, J. (2007). Open courseware futures: Creating a parallel universe. e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 10(1), 1-9. Retrieved from http://ascilite.org/archived-journals/e-jist/docs/vol10_no1/papers/full_papers/taylorj.htm
- Weller, M., Jordan, K., DeVries, I., & Rolfe, V. (2018). Mapping the open education landscape: Citation network analysis of historical open and distance education research. Open Praxis, 10(2), 109-126. doi: 10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.822
- Zhang, J. (2005). Content analysis of web sites from 2000 to 2004: A thematic meta-analysis (Master’s thesis, Texas A&M University). Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4269757.pdf