Abstracts
Abstract
Emotion has long been a question of great interest in a wide range of fields. As a general rule, emotions are categorized as positive, which we seek, and negative, from which we turn away. However, empirically-backed connectivists claim that even negative emotions produce positive effects on student performance. What is less clear is how this process happens. This study had two primary aims. First, to assess the prevalence and distribution of emotions in connectivist environments. Second, to provide in-depth and experiment-based analysis that shows how and when negative emotions have their positive effect. Data for this study were mainly collected using an aided think-aloud protocol with nine participants, each of whom received ten tasks. Findings of the current study confirmed the dominance of negative emotions in connectivist learning environments and presented a model that could explain the variation of empirical results. Implications for researchers and teachers in distance education are discussed.
Keywords:
- connectivism,
- emotion,
- control-value theory,
- online learning,
- higher education
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- Aldahdouh, A. A. (2017). Does artificial neural network support connectivism’s assumptions? International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 14(3), 3-26. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3063496
- Aldahdouh, A. A. (2018a). Jumping from one resource to another: how do students navigate learning networks? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(45). doi: 10.1186/s41239-018-0126-x
- Aldahdouh, A. A. (2018b). Visual inspection of sequential data: A research instrument for qualitative data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(1631-1649). Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol23/iss7/10
- Aldahdouh, A. A. (2019). Individual learning experience in connectivist environment: A qualitative sequence analysis. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(2), 488-509. Retrieved from https://www.ijres.net/index.php/ijres/article/view/536
- Aldahdouh, A. A., & Osório, A. J. (2016). Planning to design MOOC? Think first! The Online Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 4(2), 47-57. Retrieved from https://www.tojdel.net/journals/tojdel/articles/v04i02/v04i02-06.pdf
- Aldahdouh, A. A., Osório, A. J., & Caires, S. (2015). Understanding knowledge network, learning and connectivism. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(10), 3-21. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3063495
- Ament, V., & Edwards, R. (2018). Better teaching and more learning in mobile learning courses: Towards a model of personable learning. In I. A. Sanchez, P. Isaias, & L. Rodrigues (Eds.), 14th International Conference Mobile Learning 2018 (pp. 214-218). NY: Curran Associates. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED590379.pdf
- Artino, A. R. (2009). Think, feel, act: Motivational and emotional influences on military students’ online academic success. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(2), 146-166. doi: 10.1007/s12528-009-9020-9
- Artino, A. R., & Jones, K. D. (2012). Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.006
- Cabrero, R. S., & Román, Ó. C. (2018). Psychopedagogical predecessors of connectivism as a new paradigm of learning. International Journal of Educational Excellence, 4(2), 29-45. doi: 10.18562/IJEE.037
- Capdeferro, N., & Romero, M. (2012). Are online learners frustrated with collaborative learning experiences? International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 26. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1127
- Clarà, M., & Barberà, E. (2013). Learning online: Massive open online courses (MOOCs), connectivism, and cultural psychology. Distance Education, 34(1), 129-136. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2013.770428
- Downes, S. (2007). Learning networks in practice. In D. Ley (Ed.), Emerging technologies for learning. Coventry: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. Retrieved from https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100202135119/http://partners.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/research/emerging_technologies07_chapter2.pdf
- Downes, S. (2008). Places to go: Connectivism & connective knowledge. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(1), 1-2. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol5/iss1/6
- Downes, S. (2009). New tools for personal learning. Presented at MEFANET 2009 Conference, Brno, Czech Republic. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/presentation/234
- Downes, S. (2016, March 10). NRC01PL 07 - The MOOC ecosystem [Video File]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxstCBbIrUs&feature=youtu.be
- Downes, S. (2019). Recent work in connectivism. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 22(2), 112-131. Retrieved from https://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2019/Downes.pdf
- Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 78(3), 215-250. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215
- Guan, Z., Lee, S., Cuddihy, E., & Ramey, J. (2006). The validity of the stimulated retrospective think-aloud method as measured by eye tracking. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI ’06, 1253-1262. doi: 10.1145/1124772.1124961
- Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(7), 74-93. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i7.1041
- Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(3), 1-8. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.523
- Kuusela, H., & Paul, P. (2000). A comparison of concurrent verbal protocol analysis retrospective. American Journal of Psychology, 113(3), 387-404. doi: 10.2307/1423365
- Lane, A. M., Whyte, G. P., Terry, P. C., & Nevill, A. M. (2005). Mood, self-set goals and examination performance: The moderating effect of depressed mood. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(1), 143-153. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.12.015
- Limbu, L., & Markauskaite, L. (2015). How do learners experience joint writing: University students’ conceptions of online collaborative writing tasks and environments. Computers and Education, 82, 393-408. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.024
- Mackness, J., & Bell, F. (2015). Rhizo14: A rhizomatic learning cMOOC in sunlight and in shade. Open Praxis, 7(1), 25-38. doi: 10.5944/openpraxis.7.1.173
- Marchand, G. C., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2012). The role of emotion in the learning process: Comparisons between online and face-to-face learning settings. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 150-160. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.10.001
- Ministry of Education and Higher Education. (2016). Higher Education Statistical Yearbook 2015/2016. Ramallah, Palestine: Ministry of Education & Higher Education.Retrieved from http://www.mohe.pna.ps/Portals/0/MOHEResources/Statistics/dalil2016-1.pdf?ver=2016-09-20-130110-623
- Noteborn, G., Bohle Carbonell, K., Dailey-Hebert, A., & Gijselaers, W. (2012). The role of emotions and task significance in virtual education. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 176-183. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.03.002
- Pando, V. F. (2018). Teaching trends in virtual education: An interpretative approach. Propósitos y Representaciones, 6(1), 485-505. doi: 10.20511/pyr2018.v6n1.167
- Pekrun, R. (2014). Emotions and learning. Brussels, Belgium: International Academy of Education. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002276/227679e.pdf
- Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 115-135. doi: 10.1037/a0013383
- Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions. In R. Pekrun (Ed.), Emotion in Education (pp. 13-36). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-012372545-5/50003-4
- Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002
- Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Perry, R. P., Kramer, K., Hochstadt, M., & Molfenter, S. (2004). Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of the test emotions questionnaire (TEQ). Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 17(3), 287-316. doi: 10.1080/10615800412331303847
- Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. P. (2014). The control-value theory of achievement emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 120-141). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Sharpe, R., & Benfield, G. (2012). Internet-based methods. In J. Arthur, M. Waring, R. Coe, & L. Hedge (Eds.), Research methods and methodologies in education (pp. 193-201). London, UK: SAGE Publications.
- Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10. Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
- Siemens, G. (2006). Connectivism: Learning theory or pastime of the self-amused. Manitoba, Canada: Learning Technologies Centre. Retrieved from https://altamirano.biz/conectivismo.pdf
- Siemens, G., & Conole, G. (2011). Connectivism: Design and delivery of social networked learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), i-iv. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/994/1831
- Siemens, G., & Tittenberger, P. (2009). Handbook of emerging technologies for learning. Manitoba, Canada: University of Manitoba. Retrieved from https://www.bucks.edu/media/bcccmedialibrary/documents/academics/facultywebresources/Handbook_Emerging-Technologies.pdf
- Tempelaar, D. T., Niculescu, A., Rienties, B., Gijselaers, W. H., & Giesbers, B. (2012). How achievement emotions impact students’ decisions for online learning, and what precedes those emotions. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 161-169. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.10.003
- Tschofen, C., & Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 124-143. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1143
- Valiente, C., Swanson, J., & Eisenberg, N. (2012). Linking students’ emotions and academic achievement: When and why emotions matter. Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 129-135. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00192.x
- Van Den Haak, M. J., De Jong, M. D. T., & Schellens, P. J. (2004). Employing think-aloud protocols and constructive interaction to test the usability of online library catalogues: A methodological comparison. Interacting with Computers, 16(6), 1153-1170. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2004.07.007
- Verhagen, P. (2006). Connectivism : A new learning theory? University of Twente, 3-10. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/doc/88324962/Connectivism-a-New-Learning-Theory
- Wang, Z., Chen, L., & Anderson, T. (2014). A framework for interaction and cognitive engagement in connectivist learning contexts. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 121-141. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1709
- Zembylas, M. (2008). Adult learners’ emotions in online learning. Distance Education, 29(1), 71-87. doi: 10.1080/01587910802004852