Documents found

  1. 1081.

    Article published in Lurelu (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Volume 27, Issue 3, 2005

    Digital publication year: 2010

  2. 1082.

    Article published in Lurelu (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Volume 28, Issue 1, 2005

    Digital publication year: 2010

  3. 1083.

    Article published in Lurelu (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Volume 29, Issue 1, 2006

    Digital publication year: 2010

  4. 1084.

    Article published in Lurelu (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Volume 29, Issue 2, 2006

    Digital publication year: 2010

  5. 1085.

    Article published in Lurelu (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Volume 22, Issue 2, 1999

    Digital publication year: 2010

  6. 1086.

    Article published in Lurelu (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Volume 20, Issue 1, 1997

    Digital publication year: 2010

  7. 1087.

    Article published in Moebius (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Issue 30, 1986

    Digital publication year: 2010

  8. 1088.

    Article published in Séquences (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Issue 198, 1998

    Digital publication year: 2010

  9. 1089.

    Article published in Brèves littéraires (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Issue 86, 2013

    Digital publication year: 2013

  10. 1090.

    Article published in Revue générale de droit (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 30, Issue 3, 1999-2000

    Digital publication year: 2014

    More information

    Use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture and food has a great economic potential but it poses various important social and ethical issues such as loss of biological diversity, threat to economical growth of developing countries, threat of independence of farmers and violation to individual precautions for health protection, moral and religious principles.With a sustainable perspective, this paper deals with the possibilities of frame of law and ethic in these matters. Labelling and identification of GMOs in foods, separated commercial channels for ordinary agricultural products and those from modern biotechnology, are presented as the basis of a growing law. The adoption of the precautionary principle in the Protocol on biosafety leads to a clear labelling of GMOs. But the real scope of the precautionary principle will be known after the Conference of the Parties to this Protocol take the decision on the detailed requirements for this purpose no later than two years after the entry into force of this Protocol.