Documents found

  1. 10361.

    Article published in Locke Studies (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 24, 2024

    Digital publication year: 2024

    More information

    This article uses the methods that Locke advocated in his Essay Concerning Human Understanding to evaluate manuscript evidence from five different schemes and two drafts of the Fundamental Constitutions of Carolina, to thereby determine what role, if any, John Locke had in writing it, and in advocating for slavery and absolutism. It focuses on the influential claims put forward by David Armitage 20 years ago, that Locke was responsible for actively promoting slavery in Carolina’s Fundamental Constitutions. It enables the reader to view, and judge, the relevant evidence. The author concludes, and invites the reader to conclude, that Armitage’s main claims lack foundation in the manuscript evidence. That evidence instead points towards the legal power of those who owned Carolina, the Lords Proprietors, and to the crown, which granted Carolina’s charter, and to the logic of a different theory of government, patriarchalism, for the rationale behind both slavery and absolutism. The central ideas behind slavery and colonization were epitomized, as Locke understood, by Sir Robert Filmer, who wrote the book to which Locke responded in his Two Treatises of Government. Filmer’s ally, Sir Henry Spelman, like Filmer a deeply committed royalist who believed in the king’s unlimited prerogatives, composed the original 1629 Carolina charter that shaped the Fundamental Constitutions. Misattributing the authorship of particular clauses to Locke is a symptom of a larger failure to distinguish the impact of momentous debates over authority and race in the seventeenth century. Locke’s theories did, in practice as well as principle, reject the theory of domination put forward by Filmer, and argued instead for human rights and democracy that were inclusive and capacious. The manuscript evidence has the potential to reshape how modern democratic theory is understood in the present.

    Keywords: Locke, Fundamental Constitutions of Carolina, slavery, absolutism, manuscripts, Sir Robert Filmer, Lords Proprietors, Two Treatises of Government, Human understanding, law, human rights, democracy, race, racism, evidence, Patriarchalism, David Armitage, seals, legality, Carolina

  2. 10362.

    Champagne, Christine and Labart, Pierre-Olivier

    Les cahiers du CRISES et de l’ARUC selon la grille de Katarsis

    ARUC-ÉS / CRISES

    2007

  3. 10365.

    Article published in International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 26, Issue 2, 2025

    Digital publication year: 2025

    More information

    When students enter higher education, self-regulated learning (SRL) involving goal setting, planning, monitoring, and reflection is crucial for academic success. This study systematically reviews SRL strategies, supporting technologies, and their impacts, especially with the shift to online learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Following Kitchenham’s guidelines, 121 articles from ScienceDirect and Scopus were reviewed. Key SRL strategies include goal setting, cognitive and metacognitive processes, time management, self-reflection, help-seeking, and monitoring. Technologies such as learning management systems (LMS), massive open online courses (MOOCs), artificial intelligence (AI), collaborative platforms, and learning analytics support SRL by providing personalized feedback and facilitating autonomous learning. Benefits include improved performance, motivation, and engagement, while challenges involve limited access to digital resources, technical issues, resistance to change, and inadequate instructor training. Addressing these barriers is essential for optimizing SRL implementation, guiding future research and educational practice.

    Keywords: self-regulated learning strategies, self-directed learning strategies, educational technologies, systematic literature review

  4. 10366.

    Article published in History of Science in South Asia (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 1, 2013

    Digital publication year: 2013

    More information

    Hypotheses of a Mesopotamian origin for the Vedic and Chinese star calendars are unfounded. The Yangshao culture burials discovered at Puyang in 1987 suggest that the beginnings of Chinese astronomy go back to the late fourth millennium BCE. The instructive similarities between the Chinese and Indian luni-solar calendrical astronomy and cosmology therefore with great likelihood result from convergent parallel development and not from diffusion.

  5. 10369.

    Éditions Thémis

    1993

  6. 10370.

    Centre études internationales et mondialisation

    2000