Documents found

  1. 31.

    Review published in Informal Logic (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 40, Issue 1, 2020

    Digital publication year: 2020

  2. 32.

    Review published in Informal Logic (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 39, Issue 3, 2019

    Digital publication year: 2019

  3. 33.

    Article published in Revue québécoise de linguistique (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 24, Issue 2, 1996

    Digital publication year: 2009

    More information

    ABSTRACTThis article is based on a description of the various processes involved in second language acquisition through the analysis of verbal interactions. We will examine the dynamics involved in the process of second language learning. These dynamics, far from being essentially based on morphosyntactic issues, relate to interaction management. For the learner, becoming competent means being able to interact in the conversation as a full participant. Specifically it is a question of knowing how to manage the impact of the discourse, by having for example an adequate mastery of argumentation and modalisation. However, this mastery implies acquiring morphosyntactic tools. We will thus analyse the dialectic between interactional issues and linguistic means. If interaction is a means to learning, it must also be learnt.

  4. 35.

    Thesis submitted to Université de Montréal

    2004

    More information

    Thèse numérisée par la Direction des bibliothèques de l'Université de Montréal.

  5. 36.

    Thesis submitted to Université de Montréal

    1989

    More information

    Mémoire numérisé par la Direction des bibliothèques de l'Université de Montréal.

  6. 37.

    Thesis submitted to Université de Montréal

    1992

    More information

    Mémoire numérisé par la Direction des bibliothèques de l'Université de Montréal.

  7. 38.

    Thesis submitted to Université de Montréal

    1998

    More information

    Mémoire numérisé par la Direction des bibliothèques de l'Université de Montréal.

  8. 40.

    Article published in Informal Logic (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 38, Issue 4, 2018

    Digital publication year: 2018

    More information

    In this paper the role of images in argumentative settings is analyzed from a cognitive angle. In particular, the proposal of this paper is to see visual argumentation as a specific form of extended and distributed cognition. In order to develop this idea, some of Wittgenstein’s insights are used to put evidence produced by research on temporal-spatial reasoning processes into philosophical perspective. Some contemporary argumentative analyses of visual argumentation are also discussed using commercial and political examples. The paper finishes with the notion of collective minds in order to specify the general idea of arguing with images as extended cognition.