Citer cet article
- MLA
-
Glusker, Ann. « PubMed’s Native Interface Remains the Best Tool for Systematic Searching of its Biomedical Citations / Wildgaard, L. E., & Lund, H. (2016). Advancing PubMed? A comparison of third-party PubMed/Medline tools. Library Hi Tech, 34 (4), 669-684. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1108/LHT-06-2016-0066. » Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, volume 12, numéro 2, 2017, p. 166–168. https://doi.org/10.18438/B88S9K
- APA
-
Glusker, A. (2017). Compte rendu de [PubMed’s Native Interface Remains the Best Tool for Systematic Searching of its Biomedical Citations / Wildgaard, L. E., & Lund, H. (2016). Advancing PubMed? A comparison of third-party PubMed/Medline tools. Library Hi Tech, 34 (4), 669-684. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1108/LHT-06-2016-0066]. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(2), 166–168. https://doi.org/10.18438/B88S9K
- Chicago
-
Glusker, Ann « PubMed’s Native Interface Remains the Best Tool for Systematic Searching of its Biomedical Citations / Wildgaard, L. E., & Lund, H. (2016). Advancing PubMed? A comparison of third-party PubMed/Medline tools. Library Hi Tech, 34 (4), 669-684. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1108/LHT-06-2016-0066 ». Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 12, no 2 (2017) : 166–168. https://doi.org/10.18438/B88S9K
Exporter la notice de cet article
RIS
EndNote, Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
ENW
EndNote (version X9.1 et +), Zotero
BIB
BibTeX, JabRef, Mendeley, Zotero