Résumés
Abstract
This paper is focused on the practice of unsolicited, reflective diary writing as an act of externalizing internal dialogue. I suggest that it should be analyzed as an argumentative practice from the point of view of pragma-dialectics. In the first part of the paper, I demonstrate that internal communication can be examined from the perspective of pragma-dialectics because it is in line with its meta-theoretical principles (especially socialization and externalization). In the second part, I suggest that reflective diary writing should be conceived of as an argumentative activity type. I show that this practice is a conventionalized activity type that is preconditioned by implicit norms governing the conduct of argumentation.
Keywords:
- argumentative activity type,
- argumentative characterization,
- internal communication,
- pragma-dialectics,
- reflective diary writing
Résumé
Cet article se concentre sur la pratique de l'écriture non sollicitée et réfléchie d'un journal comme un acte d'extériorisation du dialogue interne. Je propose qu'elle soit analysée comme une pratique argumentative du point de vue de la pragma-dialectique. Dans la première partie de l'article, je démontre que la communication interne peut être examinée du point de vue de la pragma-dialectique parce qu'elle est conforme à ses principes méta-théoriques (en particulier la socialisation et l'extériorisation). Dans la deuxième partie, je suggère que la rédaction d'un journal réflexif soit conçue comme un type d'activité argumentative. Je montre que cette pratique est un type d'activité conventionnalisé qui est préconditionné par des normes implicites régissant la conduite de l'argumentation.
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Accardo, C. M., D. C. Aboyoun, B. A. Alford and J. T. Cannon. 1996. Diaries: Who keeps them and why. Perceptual and Motor Skills 82(2): 559-562.
- Alaszewski, Andy. 2006a. Diaries as a source of suffering narratives: A critical commentary. Health, Risk & Society 8(1): 43-58.
- Alaszewski, Andy. 2006b. Using diaries for social research. Sage Publi-cations.
- Alderson-Day, Ben and Charles Fernyhough. 2015. Inner speech: Development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiol-ogy. Psychological Bulletin 141(5): 931-965.
- Androutsopoulou, Athena, Eugenia Rozou and Mary Vakondiou. 2020. Voices of hope and despair: A narrative-dialogical inquiry into the diaries, letters, and suicide notes of Virginia Woolf. Journal of Con-structivist Psychology 33(4): 367-384.
- Aveling, Emma-Louise, Alex Gillespie and Flora Cornish. 2015. A qualitative method for analysing multivoicedness. Qualitative Re-search 15(6): 670-687.
- Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 2006. The dialogic imagination: Four essays, ed. Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
- Baud, David. 2001. Using journal writing to enhance reflective prac-tice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education (90): 9-18.
- Baumtrog, Michael D. 2018. Reasoning and arguing, dialectically and dialogically, among individual and multiple participants. Argumen-tation 32(1): 77-98.
- Billig, Michael 1996. Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Burt, Christopher D. B. 1994. An analysis of a self-initiated coping behavior: Diary-keeping. Child Study Journal 24(3): 171-189.
- Crowther, Barbara. 1999. Writing as performance: Young girls’ diaries. In Making meaning of narratives, eds. Ruthellen Josselson and Amia Lieblich, 197-221. Sage.
- Culley, Margo. 1985. A day at a time: The diary literature of American women from 1764 to the present. The Feminist Press at CUNY.
- Dijck, José van. 2004. Composing the self: Of diaries and lifelogs. The Fibreculture Journal 3. <http://three.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-012-composing-the-self-of-diaries-and-lifelogs/>.
- Eemeren, Frans H. van. 2010. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Eemeren, Frans H. van. 2016. Identifying argumentative patterns: A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics. Argumentation 30(1): 1-24.
- Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij and Jean H. M. Wagemans. 2014. Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Berlin: De Gruyter.
- Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson and Scott Jacobs. 1993. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Alabama: The University of Alabama Press.
- Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. 2002. Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presenta-tion. Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser. 2005. Theoretical con-struction and argumentative reality: An analytic model of critical discussion and conventionalised types of argumentative activity. In OSSA conference archive. URL accessed 5 October 2021: <http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA6/papers/9>.
- Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser 2006. Strategic maneuver-ing: A synthetic recapitulation. Argumentation 20(4): 381-392.
- Eemeren, Frans H. van, Peter Houtlosser, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. 2007. Argumentative indicators: A pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Fernyhough, Charles. 2004. Alien voices and inner dialogue: Towards a developmental account of auditory verbal hallucinations. New Ideas in Psychology 22(1): 49-68.
- Fisher, Roger and William Ury. 1981. Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
- Fothergill, Robert A. 1995. One day at a time: The diary as lifewriting. A/B: Auto/Biography Studies 10(1): 81-91.
- Geheran, Michael J. 2011. “I am fighting the hardest battle for my Germanness now”: Internal dialogues of Victor Klempe-rer. Psychology & Society 4(2): 21-39.
- Gillespie, Alex, Flora Cornish, Emma-Louise Aveling and Tania Zittoun. 2008. Conflicting community commitments: A dialogical analysis of a British woman’s World War II diaries. Journal of Community Psychology 36(1): 35-52.
- Gillespie, David. 1999. First person singular: The literary diary in twentieth-century Russia. The Slavonic and East European Review 77(4): 620-645.
- Greco, Sara. 2016. Analysing multiple addressivity in research inter-views: A methodological suggestion from argumentation theo-ry. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 8: 61-74.
- Greco, Sara. 2017. Using argumentative tools to understand inner dialogue. Argumentation 31(2): 331-358.
- Greco Morasso, Sara. 2013. Multivoiced decisions: A study of mi-grants’ inner dialogue and its connection to social argumenta-tion. Pragmatics & Cognition 21(1): 55-80.
- Harrison, Kimberly. 2003. Rhetorical rehearsals: The construction of ethos in confederate women’s civil war diaries. Rhetoric Review 22(3): 243-263.
- Hermans, Hubert J. M. 1996. Opposites in a dialogical self: Constructs as characters. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 9(1): 1-26.
- Hermans, Hubert J. M. 2001. The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology 7(3): 243-281.
- Hermans, Hubert J. M. 2003. The construction and reconstruction of a dialogical self. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 16(2): 89-130.
- Hermans, Hubert J. M. 2018. Society in the self. A theory of identity in democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hermans, Hubert. J. M. and Agniezska Hermans-Konopka. 2010. Dialogical self theory: Positioning and counter-positioning in a glob-alizing society. Cambridge University Press.
- Hubbs, Delaura L. and Charles F. Brand. 2005. The paper mirror: Understanding reflective journaling. Journal of Experiential Educa-tion 28(1): 60-71.
- Hyers, Lauri L. 2018. Diary methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kunt, Gergely. 2015. How do diaries begin? The narrative rites of adolescent diaries in Hungary. European Journal of Life Writing 4: 30-55.
- Larrain, Antonia and Andrés Haye. 2012. The role of rhetoric in a dialogical approach to thinking. Journal for the Theory of Social Be-haviour 42(2): 220-237.
- Lejeune, Phillipe. 2009. On Diary. Manoa: University of Hawaii Press.
- Levinson, Stephen C. 1992. Activity types and language. In Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, eds. Paul Drew and John Heritage, 66-100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Martinson, Deborah. 2003. In the presence of audience: The self in diaries and fiction. Ohio State University Press.
- McFerran, Shannon and Daniel G. Scott. 2013. The girls’ diary project: writing ourselves into being. Victoria: University of Victoria.
- Nienkamp, Jean. 2001. Internal rhetorics: Toward a history and theory of self-persuasion. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
- Nir, Dina. 2012. Voicing inner conflict: From a dialogical to a negotia-tional self. In Handbook of dialogical self theory, eds. Hubert J. M. Hermans and Thorsten Gieser, 284-300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Nir, Dina. 2016. Becoming the leader of your decisions. In Assessing and stimulating a dialogical self in groups, teams, cultures, and or-ganizations, ed. Hubert J. M. Hermans, 1-17. Springer.
- Oleś, Piotr and Małgorzata Puchalska-Wasyl. 2010. Between nature and culture? Dialogicity as a basic human feature. In Studies in the psy-chology of language and communication, ed. Barbara Bokus, 41-51. Warsaw: MATRIX Publisher.
- Paperno, Irina. 2004. What can be done with diaries? The Russian Review 63(4): 561-573.
- Rainer, Tristine. 1980. The new diary. How to use a journal for self-guidance and expanded creativity. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
- Rendall, Steven. 1986. On diaries. Diacritics 16(3): 56-65.
- Rocci, Andrea. 2005. Connective predicates in monologic and dialogic argumentation. Studies in Communication Sciences 5: 97-118.
- Rottenberg-Rosler, Biri, Shifra Schonmann and Emanuel Berman. 2009. Dear Diary: Catharsis and narratives of aloneness in adoles-cents’ diaries. Enquire 2(1): 133-156.
- Sederberg, Kathryn. 2017. Writing through crisis: Time, history, futuri-ty in German diaries of the second world war. Biography 40(2): 323-341.
- Seiffge-Krenke, Inge. 1997. Imaginary companions in adolescence: Sign of a deficient or positive development? Journal of Adolescence 20(2): 137-154.
- Sinats, Petra, Daniel G. Scott, Shannon McFerran, Madelaine Hittos, Carys Cragg, Theresa Leblanc and Daniela Brooks. 2005. Writing ourselves into being: Writing as spiritual self-care for adolescent girls. Part two. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality 10(3): 263-276.
- Surd-Büchele, Stefanie. 2011. On the relations between writing and thinking. Tätigkeitstheorie: E-Journal for Activity Theoretical Re-search in Germany 2(5): 121-141.
- Svačinová, Iva. 2021. Pragma-dialectical reconstruction of crisis diary writing as a communicative activity type. Argumentation 35(2): 237-264.
- Vygotsky, Lev. 1987. Thought and language, ed. Alex Kozulin. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
- Wagemans, Jean H. M. 2016. Constructing a periodic table of argu-ments. In OSSA conference archive. URL accessed 5 October 2021: <https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA11/papersandcommentaries/106>.
- Wal, Marijke J. van der and Gijsbert Rutten. 2013. Ego-documents in a historical-sociolinguistic perspective. In Touching the past: Studies in the historical sociolinguistics of ego-documents, eds. Marijke J. van der Wal and Gijsbert Rutten, 1-18. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing company.
- Zammuner, Vanda L. 2001. Diary kinds and functions, and adoles-cents’ motives for keeping a diary. In Proceedings of the 3rd confer-ence of the International Society for Quality of Life Studies (ISQOLS), eds. Ferran Casas and Carme Saurina, 453-474. Girona: Universidad de Girona.
- Zampa, Marta and Daniel Perrin. 2016. Arguing with oneself. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5(1): 9-28.
- Zittoun, Tania. 2014. Three dimensions of dialogical movement. New Ideas in Psychology 32: 99-106.
- Zittoun, Tania and Alex Gillespie. 2012. Using diaries and self-writings as data in psychological research. In Emerging methods in psychology, eds. Emily Abbey and Seth Surgan, 1-26. New Brunswick/New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.