Résumés
Abstract
In this article, we summarize research on Prince Edward Island where a Prince Edward Island teacher, identifying as an a/r/tographer, designed a digital and multiliteracies unit, as part of a directed studies course in her Master of Education program. Small in scope, this single participant case study was designed to give a fuller picture to three difficulties teachers often face when teaching new literacies. These are (1) applying multiliteracies theory, (2) thinking across literacies domains, and (3) assessing literacies holistically. Findings are derived from our six research conversations, and our discussion highlights the necessity of artistic ways of being and thinking for teacher education programs in the 21st century.
Résumé
Dans cet article, nous résumons les recherches au sein desquelles un enseignant de l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard — s’identifiant comme un a/r/tographe — a créé une unité numérique et multilittéraire dans le cadre d’un cours d’études dirigées d’un programme de maitrise en éducation. Bien que d’ampleur modeste, cette étude de cas s’attardant à un seul participant a été élaborée dans le but de tracer le portrait complet de trois difficultés fréquemment rencontrées par les enseignants lorsqu’ils enseignent de nouvelles littératies. Ces difficultés consistent à (1) appliquer la théorie relative aux multilittératies; (2) adopter un mode de pensée interlittératies et (3) évaluer les littératies de manière globale. Les conclusions sont fondées sur six conversations tenues dans le cadre de la recherche, et notre article met en lumière la nécessité de repenser la formation des maitres au 21e siècle, pour y intégrer des manières artistiques d’être et de réfléchir.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Biesta, G. (2012). Receiving the gift of teaching: From “learning from” to “being taught by.” Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32(5), 449-461.
- Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Ashton, D. (2008). Education, globalization and the future of the knowledge economy. European Educational Research Journal, 7(2), 131-156.
- Crook, C., & Bennett, L. (2007). Does using a computer disturb the organization of children’s writing? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25(2), 313-321.
- Dochy, F., Mien, S., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(1), 533-568.
- Dutro, E., Selland, M. K., & Bien, A. C. (2013). Revealing writing, concealing writers: High-stakes assessment in an urban elementary classroom. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(2), 99-141. doi: 10.1177/1086296X13475621
- Irwin, R. L., Beer, R., Springgay, S., & Grauer, K. (2006). The rhizomatic relations of A/r/tography. Studies in Art Education, 48(1), 70-88.
- Irwin, R. L., & O’Donoghue, D. (2012). Encountering pedagogy through relational art practices. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 31(3), 221-236.
- Irwin, R. L., & Springgay, S. (2008). A/r/tography as practice based research. In S. Springgay, R. L. Irwin, C. Leggo, & P. Gouzouasis (Eds.), Being with A/r/tography (pp. xiii-xxvii). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
- MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (2008). Handbook of writing research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- McKnight, D. (2006). The gift of curriculum method. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 8(2),171-183.
- McManus, J. (2013, March 1). Untitled [poem]. Daily Haiku. Retrieved from http://www.dailyhaiku.org/haiku/2013-march-01
- New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
- Norris, J. (2011). Towards the use of the ‘Great Wheel’ as a model in determining the quality and merit of arts-based projects (research and instruction). International Journal of Education & the Arts, 12, 1-24. Retrieved from http://www.ijea.org/v12si1/index.html
- Pegrum, M., (2009). From blogs to bombs: The future of digital technologies in education. Crawley, Australia: UWA Publishing.
- Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Pring, R. (2004). Philosophy of educational research. London, United Kingdom: Continuum.
- Richardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 923-949). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Literate expertise. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 172-194). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
- Senior, R. (2010). Connectivity: A framework for understanding effective language teaching in face-to-face and online learning communities. RELC Journal, 41(2), 137-147.
- Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., & Gielen, S. (2006). On the dynamics of students’ approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching / learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16(1), 279-294.
- Wiebe, S. (2008). Resonation in writing. In S. Springgay, R. Irwin, C. Leggo, & P. Gouzouasis (Eds.), Being with a/r/tography (pp. 95-107). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
- Wiebe, S. (2010). A poet’s journey as a/r/togrpher: Teaching poetry to create a community of practice with junior high school students. Learning Landscapes, 4(1), 239-255.
- Wiebe, S. (2013). How do I teach writing in a digital and global world? In K. James, T. Dobson, & C. Leggo (Eds.), English in middle and secondary classrooms (pp. 223-227). Toronto, ON: Pearson.
- Wiebe, S., & Caseley Smith, C. (2016). Teacher and student a/r/tographers creating cellphilms. In C. Burkholder, K. MacEntee, & Jo. Schwab (Eds.), What’s a Cellphilm?: Integrating mobile phone technology into participatory arts based research and activism (pp. 87-103). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
- Wiebe, S., & Morrison-Robinson, D. (2013). Becoming a/r/tographers while contesting rationalist discourses of work. Multi-Disciplinary Research in the Arts, 3(2), 1-18.
- Wiebe, S., Sameshima, P., Irwin, R., Leggo, C., Grauer, K., & Gouzouasis, P. (2007). Re-imagining arts integration: Rhizomatic relations to the everyday. Journal of Educational Thought,41(3), 263-280.
- Williamson, B. (2013). The future of curriculum. School knowledge in a digital age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Wolsey, T. D., & Grisham, D. L. (2007). Adolescents and the new literacies: Writing engagement. Action in Teacher Education, 29(2), 29-38.