Résumés
Résumé
L’article présente le processus d’élaboration et de validation de l’échelle de la perception et du sentiment d’auto-efficacité des apprenants vis-à-vis de la vidéocommunication (ÉPAV). Basée sur la théorie sociocognitive de Bandura (1977, 1982, 1997/2007), cette échelle permet d’évaluer deux dimensions : la perception générale de la vidéocommunication et celle que l’individu a de son propre niveau de compétence dans ce contexte. Les résultats soutiennent la structure bidimensionnelle ainsi que la cohérence interne de l’ÉPAV. Des corrélations avec des mesures de la motivation et de l’expérience en vidéocommunication ainsi qu’avec des mesures de l’attention en appuient la validité.
Mots-clés:
- vidéocommunication,
- vidéoconférence,
- perception,
- auto-efficacité,
- attention,
- expérience,
- motivation,
- questionnaire,
- échelle de mesure,
- élaboration de test
Abstract
This article presents both the development and validation process of the learner’s perception and sense of self-efficacy towards videoconferencing scale (ÉPAV). Based on Bandura’s sociocognitive theory (1977, 1982, 1997/2007), this scale evaluates two dimensions: the general perception of videoconferencing and the perception that the individual has of his own level of competence in this context. The results support the bidimensional structure and the internal consistency of the ÉPAV. The correlations with measures of motivation and experience in videoconferencing as well as measures of attention support its validity.
Keywords:
- videoconferencing,
- perception,
- self-efficacy,
- attention,
- experience,
- motivation,
- questionnaire,
- rating scale,
- test construction
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Références
- Abbott, L., Dallat, J., Livingston, R. et Robinson, A. (1994). The application of videoconferencing to the advancement of independent group learning for professional development. Education and Training Technology International (ETTI), 31(2), 85-92.
- Acar, A. (2007). Teaching languages from a distance through multipoint videoconferencing. Foreign Language Annals, 40(2), 311-319.
- Anastasiades, P. S., Vitalaki, E. et Gertzakis, N. (2008). Collaborative learning activities at a distance via interactive videoconferencing in elementary schools: Parents’ attitudes. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1527-1539.
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
- Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
- Bandura, A. (2007). Auto-efficacité : le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle (2e éd.) (J. Lecomte, trad.). Bruxelles : De Boeck. (Ouvrage original publié en 1997 sous le titre Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York : W.H. Freeman).
- Beaulieu, M. et Jackson, F. (1996). La vidéocommunication : évaluation des expériences en pédagogie universitaire (rapport technique). Rimouski, Canada : Université du Québec à Rimouski.
- Biocca, F., Harms, C. et Burgoon, J. K. (2004). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence, 12(5), 456-480.
- Bourdeau, J. (2002). Vers une intégration pédagogique de la vidéocommunication dans la formation des maîtres. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 28(2), 289-304.
- Bourdeau, J., Ouellet, M. et Gauthier, R. (1998). Interactivity in videoconference-based telepresentations. Dans T. Ottmann et I. Tomek (dir.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA/ED-TELECOM 98. World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia & World Conference on Educational Telecommunications (p. 233-237). Charlottesville, VA : Association for the Advancement of Computer in Education [AACE].
- Bramble, W. J. et Martin, B. L. (1995). The Florida Teletraining Project: Military training via two-way compressed video. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(1), 6-26.
- Brown, K. G., Rietz, T. A. et Sugrue, B. (2005). The effects of videoconferencing, class size and learner characteristics on training outcomes. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 18(1), 59-73.
- Buhendwa, F. M. (1996). Preservice teachers’ computer literacy: Validation of an instrument to measure self-efficacy for computer-based technologies (rapport de recherche). (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED404355)
- Callas, P. W., Bertsch, T. F., Caputo, M. P., Flynn, B. S., Doheny-Farina, S. et Ricci, M. A. (2004). Medical student evaluations of lectures attended in person or from rural sites via interactive videoconferencing. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 16(1), 46-50.
- Capner, M. (2000). Videoconferencing in the provision of psychological services at a distance. Journal of Telemedecine and Telecare, 6(6), 311-319.
- Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 323-337.
- Collins, A., Neville, P. et Bielaczyc, K. (2000). The role of different media in designing learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 144-162.
- Collis, B., Peters, O. et Pals, N. (2000). Influences on the educational use of the WWW, e-mail and videoconferencing. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(2), 108-119.
- Collis, B., Peters, O. et Pals, N. (2001). A model for predicting the educational use of information and communication technologies. Instructional Science, 29(2), 95-125.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. et Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 526-536.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K. et Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. Cambridge, UK. : Cambridge University Press.
- Dal Bello, A., Knowlton, E. et Chaffin, J. (2007). Interactive videoconferencing as a medium for special education: Knowledge acquisition in preservice teacher education. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43(1), 38-46.
- Daley, L. K., Spalla, T. L., Arndt, M. J. et Warnes, A. (2008). Videoconferencing and Web-based conferencing to enhance learning communities. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(2), 78-81.
- Dallat, J., Fraser, G., Livingston, R. et Robinson, A. (1992a). Expectations and practice in the use of video-conferencing for teaching and learning: An evaluation. Research in Education, 48, 92-102.
- Dallat, J., Fraser, G., Livingston, R. et Robinson, A. (1992b). Teaching and learning by videoconferencing at the University of Ulster. Open Learning, 7(2), 14-22.
- Demers, B., Beaulieu, M., Harvey, L. et Chouinard, L. (1998). L’implantation d’un réseau de vidéocommunication : le cas de l’UQAR. Distances, 2(2), 49-66.
- Dussault, M., Deaudelin, C., Brodeur, M. et Richer, J. (2002). Validation de l’échelle du sentiment d’efficacité des enseignants à l’égard de l’intégration des TIC en classe (SETIC). Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 25(2-3), 1-10.
- Dussault, M., Villeneuve, P. et Deaudelin, C. (2001). L’échelle d’autoefficacité des enseignants : validation canadienne-française du « Teacher efficacy scale ». Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 27(1), 181-194.
- Ellis, D. et Mayrose, J. (2003). The success of emergency telemedicine at the State University of New York at Buffalo. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, 9(1), 73-79.
- Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J. et Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Gibson, S. et Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582.
- Gillies, D. G. (2008). Student perspectives on videoconferencing in teacher education at a distance. Distance Education, 29(1), 107-118.
- Giroux, P. (2007). Étude systémique de facteurs liés à l’attention en contexte de vidéocommunication chez des apprenants universitaires de premier cycle. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Canada. doi:10.1522/030018885
- Goddard, R. et Goddard, Y. (2001). A multilevel analysis of the relationship between teacher and collective efficacy in urban schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 807-818.
- Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes towards the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63-69.
- Harvey, L., Beaulieu, M., Demers, B. et Proulx, J. (1998). Enseignement synchrone médiatisé à distance : Internet, vidéoconférence, ou de retour à la classe régulière? Distances, 2(2), 27-48.
- Harvey, L., Beaulieu, M., Gendron, M., Demers, B., Pilon, D. et Allain, M. (1998). Enseignement synchrone médiatisé : les premiers jalons. Dans M. Bourbonnais et L. Sauvé (dir.), Partenaires de la technologie éducative : université, milieu scolaire et entreprise (p. 165-172). Sainte-Foy, Canada : Télé-université.
- Hinson, J., DiStefano, C. et Daniel, C. (2003). The Internet self-perception scale: Measuring elementary students’ levels of self-efficacy regarding Internet use. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(2), 209-228.
- Klein, D., Davis, P. et Hickey, L. (2005). Videoconferences for rural physicians’ continuing health education. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 11(suppl. 1), 97-99.
- Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179-211.
- Lee, L. (2007). Fostering second language oral communication through constructivist interaction in desktop video conferencing. Foreign Language Annals, 40(4), 635-649.
- Lemaire, E. D. et Greene, G. (2003). A comparison between three electronic media and in-person learning for continuing education in physical rehabilitation. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 9(1), 17-22.
- Lemaire, P. (1999). Psychologie cognitive. Paris : De Boeck et Larcier.
- Marchand, L., Loisier, J. et Bernatchez, P. (1999). L’enseignement supérieur par vidéoconférence et support télématique en français au Canada : développement d’une approche pour les professeurs (rapport de recherche). Ottawa, Canada : Bureau des technologies d’apprentissage [BTA].
- Miner, A. G., Glomb, T. M. et Hulin, C. L. (2001, avril). Mood at work: Experience sampling using palmtop computers. Dans H. Weiss (prés.), Experience sampling methods (ESM) in organizational research. Symposium tenu dans le cadre de la 16th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
- Mohammed, Y. Q., Waddington, G. et Donnan, P. (2008). Face-to-face vs. real-time clinical education: No significant difference. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 5(4), 287-296.
- Motamedi, V. (2001). A critical look at the use of videoconferencing in United States distance education. Education and Training Technology International (ETTI), 122(2), 386-394.
- Nance, K. L. et Strohmaier, M. (1998). Faculty development and distance education. Dans T. Ottmann et I. Tomek (dir.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA/ED-TELECOM 98. World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia & World Conference on Educational Telecommunciations (p. 1853-1854). Charlottesville, VA : Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education [AACE].
- Nance, K. L. et Strohmaier, M. (1999). Effective distance education via interactive video. Dans B. Collis et R. Oliver (dir.) Proceedings of Ed-Media 1999 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (p. 1462-1463). Charlottesville, VA : Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education [AACE].
- Norušis, M. J. (1993). SPSS for Windows, Professional Statistics, Release 6.0. Chicago, IL : SPSS.
- O’Dowd, R. (2007). Evaluating the outcomes of online intercultural exchange. English Language Teachers Journal, 61(2), 144-152.
- Parrish, M. (2008). Dancing the distance: iDance Arizona videoconferencing reaches rural communities. Research in Dance Education, 9(2), 187-208.
- Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R. et Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
- Piché, S. (2003). Précurseurs motivationnels des performances sportive et scolaire. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, Université Laval, Canada. Récupéré du site Archimède, Université Laval : http://www.theses.ulaval.ca/2003/20726/20726.pdf
- Rees, C. et Haythornthwaite, S. (2004). Telepsychology and videoconferencing: Issues, opportunities and guidelines for psychologists. Australian Psychologist, 39(3), 212-219.
- Reynolds, A. et Anderson, R. H. (1992). Selecting and developing media for instruction. New York : Van Nostrand Reinhold.
- Rich, Y., Lev, S. et Fisher, S. (1996). Extending the concept and assessment of teacher efficacy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(6), 1015-1025.
- Roblyer, M., Freeman, J., Donaldson, M. B. et Maddox, M. (2007). A comparison of outcomes of virtual school courses offered in synchronous and asynchronous formats. Internet & Higher Education, 10(4), 261-268.
- Romiszowski, A. J. (1981). Designing instructional systems – Decision making in course planning and curiculum design. New York : Nichols.
- Romiszowski, A. J. (1988). The selection and use of instructional media – For improved classroom teaching and for interactive, individualized instruction. Londres/New York : Kogan Page et Nichols.
- Saklofske, D. H., Michayluk, J. O. et Randhawa, B. S. (1988). Teachers’ efficacy and teaching behaviors. Psychological Reports,63, 407-414.
- Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
- Salomon, G. (1983). The differential investment of mental effort in learning from different sources. Educational Psychologist, 18(1), 42-50.
- Salomon, G. (1984). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 647-658.
- Samii, A., Ryan-Dykes, P., Tsukuda, R. A., Zink, C., Franks, R. et Nichol, W. P. (2006). Telemedicine for delivery of health care in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 12(1), 16-18.
- Saw, K. G., Majid, O., Ghani, N. A., Atan, H., Idrus, R. M., Rahman, Z. A. etal. (2008). The videoconferencing learning environment: Technology, interaction and learning intersect. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 475-485.
- Senécal, C., Vallerand, R. J. et Guay, F. (2001). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Toward a motivational model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 176-186.
- Simon, H. A. (1986). The role of attention in cognition. Dans S. L. Friedman, K. A. Klivington et R. W. Peterson (dir.), The brain, cognition and education (p. 105-115). Orlando, FL : Academic Press.
- Skopek, T. A. et Schuhmann, R. A. (2008). Traditional and non-traditional students in the same classroom? Additional challenges of the distance education environment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 11(1), 6.
- Stafford, T. F. et Lindsey, K. L. (2007). IP teleconferencing in the wired classroom: Gratifications for distance education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 18(2), 227-232.
- Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality : dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of communication, 42(4), 73-93.
- Stolovitch, H. D. et La Rocque, G. (1983). Introduction à la technologie de l’instruction. Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Canada : Préfontaine.
- Tabachnick, B. G. et Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5e éd.). Boston, MA : Allyn & Bacon.
- Tiene, D. (1997a). Student perspectives on distance learning with interactive television. Techtrends, 42(1), 41-47.
- Tiene, D. (1997b). Teaching via two-way television: The instructor’s perspective. International Journal of Instructional Design, 24(2), 123-131.
- Turner, J. W. (2001). Telepsychiatry as a case study of presence: Do you know what you are missing? Dans P. Whitten (dir.), Health and the new media [numéro special]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(4).
- Uekawa, K., Borman, K. et Lee, R. (2001, avril). Assessing student engagement in mathematics and science classroom using the experience sampling method. Communication présentée à la Conference for Urban Systemic Initiative [USI] and Comprehensive Partnerships for Mathematics and Science Achievement [CPMSA] Data Managers, Local Evaluators, Project Directors and Urban Study Groups, Tampa, FL. Récupéré du site de la conférence : http://www.systemic.com/siconf2001/pdf/papers/29.pdf
- Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M. et Pelletier, L. G. (1989). Construction et validation de l’échelle de motivation en éducation (EME). Revue canadienne des sciences comportementales, 21(3), 323-349.
- van Boxel, P., Anderson, K. et Regnard, C. (2003). The effectiveness of palliative care education delivered by videoconferencing compared with face-to-face delivery. Palliative Medicine, 17(4), 344-358.
- Voyer, J., Valois, P. et Rémillard, B. (2000). La sélection des participants. Dans R. J. Vallerand et U. Hess (dir.), Méthodes de recherche en psychologie (p. 91-132). Montréal, Canada : Gaëtan Morin.
- Wheeler, S. (2000). User reactions to videoconferencing: Which students cope best? Education Media International, 37(1), 31-38.
- Xu, L. Q., Lei, B. et Hendriks, E. (2002). Computer vision for a 3-D visualisation and telepresence collaborative working environment. BT Technology Journal, 20(1), 64-74.
- Yair, G. (2000a). Educational battlefields in America: The tug-of-war over students’ engagement with instruction. Sociology in Education, 73(4), 247-269.
- Yair, G. (2000b). Not just about time: Instructional practices and productive time in school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(4), 485-512.