Abstracts
Abstract
This paper presents the findings of a study on a fully online Bachelor’s level course in Health Sciences at a European University conducted to explore the influence of learning design on the formation and evolution of different types of communities of learning. The impetus for the study came from the well-established effectiveness of community-based learning, a need for understanding learning design and analytics within networked structures and, the lack of theoretical grounding for social network analysis (SNA) in previous literature. Our study uses the Integrated Methodological Framework (IMF) which employs SNA as the key methodology for exploring community-based learning in light of the Communities of Practice (CoP) and Community of Inquiry (CoI) frameworks. The course comprised of three differently designed successive discussion forums spanning three weeks each. Network diagrams and SNA measures clearly showed the impact of the different learning designs on student engagement in the discussion forums. Based on CoP and CoI structural components within the IMF, a comparative analysis of whole-network properties of the three networks indicated the formation of a CoP, initiated and mediated by the tutor in discussion 1, sustained by the students in discussion 2, and disintegrated due to lack of guidance and facilitation in discussion 3. Qualitative analysis on the content of discussion posts revealed the importance of group oriented messages in the formation of the CoP. The paper discusses findings in terms of implications for learning design and analytics in online learning and the role of the tutor in community formation.
Keywords:
- online learning,
- learning design,
- learning analytics,
- communities of practice,
- community of inquiry,
- social network analysis,
- online facilitation
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- Agostinho, S., Oliver, R., Harper, B., Hedberg, J., & Wills, S. (2002). A tool to evaluate the potential for an ICT-based learning design to foster "high-quality learning". In A. Williamson, A. Young, C. Gunn, & S. Clear (Eds.), Winds of change in the sea of learning. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 8-11). Auckland, NZ: UNITEC Institute of Technology. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/125/
- Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
- Biza, I., Jaworski, B., & Hemmi, K. (2014). Communities in university mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 161-176. doi: 10.1080/14794802.2014.918351
- Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies. Retrieved from https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2760c85a6db2aa933963b1410aaee04c7/cabird
- Boud, D., & Prosser, M. (2002). Appraising new technologies for learning: A framework for development. Educational Media International, 39(3), 237-245. doi: 10.1080/09523980210166026
- Carvalho, L. & Goodyear, P., eds. (2014). The architecture of productive learning environments. New York and London: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781135070182
- Carvalho, L., Goodyear, P., & De Laat, M. (2017). Place, space, and networked learning. In L. Carvalho, P. Goodyear, & M. De Laat (Eds.), Place based spaces for networked learning (pp. 1-10). New York and London: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Place-Based-Spaces-for-Networked-Learning/Carvalho-Goodyear-de-Laat/p/book/9781138850880
- Cohen J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychology Measurement, 20, 37-46. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104
- Cela, K. L., Sicilia, M. A., & Sanchez, S. (2015). Social network analysis in e-learning environments: A preliminary systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 219-246. doi: 10.1007/s10648-014-9276-0
- Conole, G. (2012). Designing for learning in an open world. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Analytics to literacies: The development of a learning analytics framework for multiliteracies assessment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(4), 284-305. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i4.1878
- De Laat, M. (2012). Enabling professional development networks: How connected are you? Heerlen: LOOK, Open Universiteit of the Netherlands. Retrieved from https://www.avs.nl/sites/default/files/documenten/artikelen/12014/De%20Laat%20-%20Enabling%20professional%20development%20networks.pdf
- De Laat, M., & Prinsen, F. R. (2014). Social learning analytics: Navigating the changing settings of higher education. Research & Practice in Assessment, 9, 51-60. Retrieved from http://www.rpajournal.com/dev/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/A5.pdf
- Donald, C., Blake, A., Girault, I., Datt, A., & Ramsay, E. (2009). Approaches to learning design: past the head and the hands to the HEART of the matter. Distance Education, 30(2), 179-199.
- Fink, J. E., & Inkelas, K. K. (2015). A history of learning communities within American higher education In M. Benjamin (Ed.), Learning communities from start to finish: New directions for student services (pp. 5-15). Wiley Online Library. doi: 10.1002/ss.20113
- Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. New York: RoutledgeFalmer. doi: 10.4324/9780203166093
- Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitation cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148. doi: 10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
- Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (2004). Research on networked learning: An overview. In P. Goodyear, S. Banks, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell, (Eds.), Advances in research on networked learning (pp. 1-9). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-7909-5_1
- Howell-Richardson, C., & Mellar, H. (1996). A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer mediated communication courses. Instructional Science, 24, 47-69. doi: 10.1007/BF00156003
- Hughes, J., Jewson, N., & Unwin, L. (2007). Introduction. In J. Hughes, N. Jewson, & L. Unwin (Eds.), Communities of practice: Critical perspectives (pp. 1-10). London: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/Communities-Practice-Perspectives-Jason-Hughes/dp/0415364744
- Jan, S. K., & Vlachopoulos, P. (2018). Social network analysis: A framework for identifying communities in higher education online learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. doi: 10.1007/s10758-018-9375-y
- Jan, S. K., Vlachopoulos, P., & Parsell, M. (in press). Social network analysis and learning communities in higher education online learning: A systematic literature review. Online Learning.
- Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.523
- Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
- Lockyer, L., Heathcote, E., & Dawson, S. (2013). Informing pedagogical action: Aligning learning analytics with learning design. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1439-1459. doi: 10.1177/0002764213479367
- Matthews, R. (1994). Enriching teaching and learning through learning communities. In T. O'Banion (Eds.), Teaching and learning in the community college. Washington, DC: The American Association of Community Colleges. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/Teaching-Learning-Community-College-OBanion/dp/0871172666
- Merriam-Webster. (2017). Merriam-Webster dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/community
- Moule, P. (2007). Challenging the five-stage model for e-learning: A new approach. Research in Learning Technology, 15(1), 2-36. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v15i1.10911
- Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/Building-Learning-Communities-Cyberspace-Jossey-Bass/dp/0787944602
- Pike, G. R. (1999). The effects of residential learning communities and traditional residential living arrangements on educational gains during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 40(3), 269-284. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232494922_The_Effects_of_Residential_Learning_Communities_and_Traditional_Residential_Living_Arrangements_on_Educational_Gains_During_the_First_Year_of_College
- Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8-22. Retrieved from http://iaied.org/pub/951/file/951_paper.pdf
- Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page. doi: 10.4324/9780203465424
- Salmon, G. (2003). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/1559/
- Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). A re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: Social network and content analysis. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 10-21. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.002
- Shea, P., Hayes, S., Smith, S. U., Vickers, J., Bidjerano, T, Gozza-Cohen, M., ... Tseng, C. (2013). Online learner self-regulation: Learning presence viewed through quantitative content- and social network analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 427-461. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1466
- Socnetv. (2017). Social network analysis and visualization software, v.2.3. Retrieved from http://socnetv.org/
- Smith, B. L. (2001, Summer/Fall). The challenge of learning communities as a growing national movement. Association of American Colleges & Universities, Peer Review, 4(1). Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/challenge-learning-communities-growing-national-movement
- Stacey, E. (2002). Social presence online: Networking learners at a distance. Education and Information Technologies, 7(4), 287-294.
- Tinto, V. (1998). Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 167-177. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/article/30046
- Vlachopoulos, P., & Cowan, J. (2010). Reconceptualising moderation in asynchronous online discussions using grounded theory. Distance Education, 31(1), 23-36.
- Vlachopoulos, P. (2012). The importance of power dynamics in the development of asynchronous online learning communities. In M. Brown, M. Hartnett, & T. Stewart (Eds. ), Proceedings of ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference 2012. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/42718/
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity [Kindle Edition]. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
- Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & De Laat, M. (2011) Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: A conceptual framework. Open University of the Netherlands. Retrieved from http://wenger-trayner.com/documents/Wenger_Trayner_DeLaat_Value_creation.pdf
- Zhao, C., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115-138. doi: 10.1023/B:RIHE.0000015692.88534.de