Résumés
Résumé
Cette étude propose et teste un modèle structurel des déterminants et des effets du conflit travail-famille mesuré de manière bidirectionnelle. Les données ont été collectées par questionnaire auprès de 1 356 employés ayant des responsabilités parentales. En général, les résultats confirment la qualité de l’ajustement du modèle proposé. Des recommandations sont exprimées pour favoriser un meilleur équilibre emploi-famille parmi le personnel et pour minimiser les conséquences négatives du conflit travail-famille tant pour les employés que pour les employeurs.
Summary
The purpose of this article is twofold: (1) to analyze the bi-directional work-family conflict, i.e., the influence of work characteristics on an employee’s family life (work→family conflict) and the influence of family characteristics on an employee’s professional life (family→work conflict) and, (2) to assess the validity of a structural model that encompasses both the determinants and the implications of both types of work↔family conflicts. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed structural model is the most exhaustive ever proposed for the investigation of work-family conflicts. Moreover, the study innovates by investigating a sample of Canadian organizations.
The research model investigates the determinants of both the work→family and family→work conflicts as well as the implications of each conflict on an individual’s life, either at work or at home (family). The implications of both conflicts on an individual’s overall life satisfaction are also measured. According to the model proposed in the paper, work characteristics such as organizational support, work involvement and professional roles should influence the work→family conflict while family characteristics such as family commitment, the number of children and spouse support should influence the family→work conflict. In addition, we argue that both the implications from the work→family conflict that are related to an individual’s professional life (satisfaction and job performance) and the implications from the family→work conflict that are related to an individual’s family life (satisfaction toward family life and spousal relations) influence a person’s overall life satisfaction.
Analyses rely on data drawn from a questionnaire that was developed by the authors. The study was made possible by the support of the Confederation of National Trade Unions (CNTU), a major Quebec labour movement, through its Women’s Office. Initially, the research team called executive members from each the seven labour federations comprising the CNTU to enquire if they would be willing to participate in the study and, if so, how many questionnaires should be sent to them by the Office. The only pre-requisite condition to respond to the questionnaire was for an employee’s to be supporting at least one child. Respondents put the completed questionnaire in a pre-addressed envelope to be received by one member of the research team. Respondents could either send the envelope directly to the research team or to a member of their Federation’s executive, who would then send it to the Office to be forwarded to the research team. Two weeks after the initial distribution of the questionnaires, a reminder was sent to each local union. From the 8,712 questionnaires that were sent to local unions comprising the seven Federations, 1,306 were returned for a response rate of 16% (50 respondents who indicated that they were not supporting any child were dropped from the sample).
The respondents hold different types of jobs: 391 are office clerks, 377 are professionals, 335 are technicians, 63 are production or maintenance workers, 11 are managers and 113 have another position. The respondents’ average age is 40, with 76% of them being women (n = 995) and 52% of them having two children (n = 677). Close to 85% of respondents live with a spouse, 36% of respondents have a junior college education (n = 467), 27% have a high school education (n = 351), 24% have an undergraduate degree (n = 319), 13% have a graduate education (n = 165) and 0.2% did not complete elementary school (n = 3).
Consistent with prior work, respondents perceive the work→family conflict (mean response = 3.92/7) to be more serious than the family→work conflict (mean response = 2.51/7). This finding may indicate that the boundaries around family life are more porous than those around work. For instance, in a conflict situation, employees tend to reduce their family responsibilities more than their professional responsibilities as, in contrast to family life, work implies formal performance reviews and compensation considerations. Moreover, in the short run, employees may perceive that they are more likely to suffer negative consequences if they neglect their professional responsibilities than if they neglect their family responsibilities.
Causal relations that are implied by the research model are tested through structural equations. The chi-square/degrees of freedom ratio is 3.53, which is acceptable by conventional standards. While most model-derived relations are validated, the following results are highlighted:
Work→family conflict determinants. While both organizational support and work commitment are shown to influence the conflict in the expected directions, their impact is not statistically significant. Job ambiguity as well as job conflicts and role confusion increase the level of this conflict (1.322***).
Family→work conflict determinants. Commitment towards the family has a positive but not statistically significant influence on this conflict. As expected, a higher number of children increases the level of this conflict (0.156***) while spousal support attenuates its extent (–0.673***).
Implications from the work→family conflict. This conflict leads to less overall satisfaction toward life (–0.073***) as well as toward the family (–0.124***). However, this conflict does not seem to influence the satisfaction towards spousal relations.
Implications from the family→work conflict. This conflict has a negative effect on job performance (–0.78***). However, it has no implications on work satisfaction and on overall satisfaction towards life.
Overall satisfaction towards life. Only the work→family conflict influences this comprehensive measure of satisfaction.
Other relations inferred from the model. Organizational support to help achieve a better balance between work and family significantly enhances employees’ work satisfaction (0.484***) and job performance (0.319***). In addition, spousal support greatly increases an employee’s satisfaction towards spousal relations (0.965***) and family life (0.773***).
Since some of the determinants of the work-family conflicts are under the control of employees and/or organizations, our findings may suggest potential courses of action for organizations that strive to attenuate the magnitude of such conflicts. For instance, to minimize the work→family conflict and to optimize overall life satisfaction, employees and organizations must strive to create and offer jobs where roles are not susceptible to conflicts, are unambiguous and are not overstacked. Moreover, organizations have an incentive to support initiatives that allow employees to maintain a better balance between work and family as these initiatives lead to improved employees work satisfaction and job performance. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to analyze and to corroborate how organizational support in the management of the work-family conflict can influence employees’ job performance. Finally, our study indicates that employees who want to minimize the family→work conflict must choose a spouse who will support them in both their professional and family lives. While the number of children is a significant variable in explaining the family→work conflict, spousal support does appear to be the critical variable in that regard.
Resúmen
Este estudio propone y testa un modelo estructural de factores determinantes y efectos del conflicto trabajo – familia basandose en medidas bi-direccionales. Los datos han sido obtenidos mediante un cuestionario administrado a 1356 empleados en situación de responsabilidad parental. De manera general, los resultados confirman la calidad de ajuste del modelo propuesto. Diferentes recomendaciones son formuladas a fin de favorecer un mejor equilibrio empleo-familia para el personal y minimizar las consecuencias negativas del conflicto trabajo-familia tanto para los empleados que para los empleadores.
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Adams, G.A., L.A. King et D.W. King. 1996. « Relationships of Job and Family Involvement, Family Support, and Work-Family Conflict with Job and Life Satisfaction ». Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 81, 411–420.
- Allen, T.D. 2001. « Family-Supportive Work Environments : The Role of Organizational Perceptions ». Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 58, 414–435.
- American Society for Personnel Administrators. 1988. Employer and Child Care : The Human Resources Professional’s View. Alexandria, VA. : American Society for Personnel Administrators.
- Aryee, S. 1992. « Antecedents and Outcomes Among Married Professional Women : Evidence from Singapore ». Human Relations, vol. 45, no 8, 813–837.
- Aryee, S. et V. Luk. 1996. « Work and Nonwork Influences on the Career Satisfaction of Dual-Earner Couples ». Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 49, 38–52.
- Aryee, S., D. Field et V. Luk. 1999. « A Cross-Cultural Test of a Model of the Work-Family Interface ». Journal of Management, vol. 25, no 4, 491–511.
- Barling, J. et K.E. MacEwan. 1992. « Linking Work Experiences to Facets of Marital Functioning ». Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 13, 573–583.
- Beehr, T., J. Walsh et T. Taber. 1976. « Relationship of Stress to Individually and Organizationnally Valued States : Higher Order Needs as a Moderator ». Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 61, 41–47.
- Blais, M.R., R.J. Vallerand, L.G. Pelletier et N.M. Brière. 1989. « L’échelle de satisfaction de vie : validation canadienne-française du “Satisfaction with Life Scale” ». Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, vol. 21, no 2, 210–223.
- Bohen, H.B. et A. Viveros-Long. 1981. Balancing Jobs and Family Life : Do Flexible Work Schedules Help ? Philadelphia, PA : Temple University Press.
- Boles, J.S. et B.J. Babin. 1996. « On the Front Lines : Stress, Conflict, and the Customer Service Provider ». Journal of Business Research, vol. 37, no 1, 41–50.
- Boles, J.S., M.W. Johnston, et J.F. Hair jr. 1997. « Role Stress, Work-Family Conflict and Emotional Exhaustion : Inter-Relationships and Effects on Some Work-Related Consequences ». Journal of Personnel Selling & Sales Management, vol. 17, no 1, 17–28.
- Burke, R.J. 1988. « Some Antecedents and Consequences of Work-Family Conflict ». Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, vol. 3, no 4, 287–302.
- Campbell, C.S. 2000. « Work/Family Border Theory : A New Theory of Work/Family Balance ». Human Relations, vol. 53, no 6, 747–770.
- Campbell, C.S. 2001. « Work Cultures and Work/Family Balance ». Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 58, 348–365.
- Capelli, P., J. Constantine et C. Chadwick. 2000. « It Pays to Value Family : Work and Family Tradeoff Reconsidered ». Industrial Relations, vol. 39, 175–198.
- Carlson, D.S. et P.L. Perrewé. 1999. « The Role of Social Support in the Stressor-Strain Relationship : An Examination of Work-Family Conflict ». Journal of Management, vol. 25, no 4, 513–540.
- Carlson, D.S. et K.M. Kacmar. 2000. « Work-Family Conflict in the Organization : Do Life Role Values Make a Difference ? ». Journal of Management, vol. 26, no 5, 1031–1054.
- Carlson, D.S., K.M. Kacmar, et L.J. Williams. 2000. « Construction and Initial Validation of a Multidimensional Measure of Work-Family Conflict ». Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 56, 249–276.
- Chagnon, Y. 1986. « Outil de mesure de la culture organisationnelle ». Mémoire de maîtrise, Faculté des études supérieures, Université de Montréal.
- Chenevier, L. 1996. « Les variables influençant l’ampleur du conflit “travail-famille” ressenti par l’employé(e) ». Mémoire de maîtrise, École des Hautes Études Commerciales de Montréal.
- Crouter, A.C. 1984. « Spillover from Family to Work : The Neglected Side of the Work Family Interface ». Human Relations, vol. 37, 425–442.
- Deneault, K. 1996. « Les effets des appuis organisationnels sur le conflit travail-famille et sur la vie professionnelle et sur la vie personnelle des employés ». Mémoire de maîtrise, École des Hautes Études Commerciales de Montréal.
- Deschamps, M. 1996. « Les effets du conflit “travail-famille” sur la vie professionnelle et sur la vie personnelle ». Mémoire de maîtrise, École des Hautes Études Commerciales de Montréal.
- Diener, E. 1984. « Subjective Well-Being ». Psychological Bulletin, 95.
- Duxbury, L. et C. Higgins. 1991. « Gender Differences in Work-Family Conflict ». Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 76, no 1, 60–74.
- Duxbury, L., C. Higgins et C. Lee. 1993. « The Impact of Job Type and Family Type on Work-Family Conflict and Perceived Stress : A Comparative Analysis ». Ressources Humaines, ASAC ’93, vol. 14, no 9, 21–29.
- Edwards, J.R., R.D. Caplan et R.V. Harrison. 1998. « Person-Environment Fit Theory : Conceptual Foundations, Empirical Evidence, and Directions for Future Research ». Theories of Organizational Stress. C.L. Cooper, dir. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 28–67.
- Edwards, J.R. et N.P. Rothbard. 2000. « Mechanisms Linking Work and Family : Clarifying the Relationship Between Work and Family Constructs ». Academy of Management Review, vol. 25, no 1, 178–199.
- French, J.R.P., R.D. Caplan et R.V. Harrison. 1982. The Mechanisms of Job Stress and Strain. New York : Wiley.
- Friedman, D.E. 1990. « Work and Family : The New Strategic Plan ». Human Resource Planning, vol. 13, no 3, 19–89.
- Frone, M.R. et R.W. Rice. 1987. « Work-Family Conflict : The Effect of Job and Family Involvement ». Journal of Occupational Behavior, vol. 8, 45–53.
- Frone, M.R., M. Russell et L.M. Cooper. 1992. « Antecedents and Outcomes of Work-Family Conflict : Testing a Model of the Work-Family Interface ». Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 77, no 1, 65–78.
- Frone, M.R., M. Russell et M.L. Cooper. 1997. « Relation of Work-Family Conflict to Health Outcomes : A Four Year Longitudinal Study of Employed Parents ». Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, vol. 70, no 4, 325–335.
- Frone, M., J.K. Yardley et K.S. Markel. 1997. « Developing and Testing an Integrative Model of the Work-Family Interface ». Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 50, 145–167.
- Goff, S.J., M.K. Mount et R.L. Jamison. 1990. « Employer Supported Child Care, Work/Family Conflict and Absenteeism : A Field Study ». Personnel Psychology, vol. 43, 793–809.
- Good, L.K. et C.E. Young. 1996. « Assessing Hierarchical Differences in Job-Related Attitudes and Turnover Among Retail Managers ». Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 24, no 2, 148–157.
- Greenhaus, J.H. et R.E. Kopelman. 1981. « Conflict Between Work and Nonwork Roles : Implications for the Career Planning Process ». Human Resource Planning, vol. 4, 1–10.
- Greenhaus, J.H. et N.J. Beutell. 1985. « Sources of Conflict Between Work and Family Roles ». Academy of Management Review, vol. 10, 76–88.
- Gutek, B.A., S. Searle et L. Kepla. 1991. « Rational versus Gender Role Explanations for Work-Family Conflict ». Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 76, no 4, 560–568.
- Hartmann, H.I. 1981. « The Family as the Locus of Gender, Class, and Political Struggle : The Example of Housework ». Signs, vol. 6, 366–394.
- Higgins, C.A., L.E. Duxbury et R.H. Irving. 1992. « Work-Family Conflict in the Dual-Career Family ». Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 51, 51–75.
- Higgins, C.A., L.E. Duxbury et K.L. Johnson. 2000. « Part-Time Work for Women : Does It Really Help Balance Work and Family ». Human Resource Management, vol. 39, no 1, 17–32.
- Holohan, C.K. et L.A. Gilbert. 1979a. « Conflict Between Major Life Roles : Women and Men in Dual Career Couples ». Human Relations, vol. 32, 451–467.
- Holohan, C.K. et L.A. Gilbert. 1979b. « Interrole Conflict for Working Women : Carrers versus Jobs ». Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 64, 86–90.
- Judge, T.A., J.W. Boudreau et R.D. Bretz. 1994. « Job and Life Attitudes of Male Executives ». Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 79, 767–782.
- Kanungo, R.N. 1982. « Measurement of Job and Work Involvement ». Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 67, 341–349.
- Katz, M. et C. Piotrkowski. 1983. « Correlates of Family Roles Strain Among Employed Black Women ». Family Relations, vol. 32, 331–339.
- Keith, R. et R. Schafer. 1980. « Role Strain and Depression in Two Job Families ». Family Relations, vol. 29, 483–488.
- Kelly, R.F. et P. Voydanoff. 1985. « Work-Family Role Strain among Employed Parents ». Family Relations, vol. 34, no 3, 367–374.
- Kinnunen, U. et S. Mauno. 1998. « Antecedents and Outcomes of Work-Family Conflict Among Employed Women and Men in Finland ». Human Relations, vol. 51, no 2, 157–177.
- Kopelman, R.E., J.H. Greenhaus et T.F. Connolly. 1983. « A Model of Work, Family, and Interrole Conflict : A Construct Validation Study ». Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol. 32, 198–215.
- Kossek, E.E. et C. Ozeki. 1998. « Work-Family Conflict, Policies, and the Job-Life Satisfaction Relationship : A Review and Directions for Organizational Behavior-Human Resources Research ». Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 83, no 2, 139–149.
- Larouche, V. 1980. Inventaire de satisfaction au travail. École de relations industrielles, Université de Montréal.
- Leiter, M.P. et M.J. Durup. 1996. « Work, Home, and In-Between : A Longitudinal Study of Spillover ». Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol. 32, no 1, 29–47.
- Lero, D.S., L.M. Brockman, A.R. Pence, H. Goelman et K.L. Johnson. 1993. Étude nationale canadienne sur la garde des enfants : avantages et flexibilités en milieu de travail : tour d’horizon des expériences vécues par les parents. No 89–530F au catalogue de Statistique Canada. Ottawa : Statistique Canada et Développement des ressources humaines.
- Lobel, S.A. 1991. « Allocation of Investment in Work and Family Roles : Alternatives Theories and Implications for Research ». Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, 507–521.
- Love, M., E. Galinski et D. Hugues. 1987. « Work and Family : Research Findings and Models for Change ». ILR Report, vol. 25, no 1, 13–20.
- Netemeyer, R.G., J.S. Boles et R. McMurrian. 1996. « Development and Validation of Work-Family Conflict and Family-Work Conflict Scales ». Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 81, 400–410.
- O’Driscoll, M.P., D.R. Ilgen et K. Hildreth. 1992. « Time Devoted to Job and Off-Job Activities, Interrole Conflict and Effective Experiences ». Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 77, 272–279.
- Parasuraman, S., J.H. Greenberg, S.R. Rabinowitz, A.G. Bedeian et K.W. Mossholder. 1989. « Work and Family Variables as Mediators of the Relationship between Wives’ Employment and Husbands’ Well-Being ». Academy of Management Journal, vol. 32, 185–201.
- Parasuraman, S. et J.H. Greenhaus. 1992. « Role Stressors, Social Support, and Well Being among Two-Career Couples ». Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 13, no 4, 339–356.
- Pleck, J.H., G.L. Staines et L. Lang. 1980. « Conflict Between Work and Family Life ». Monthly Labor Review, vol. 103, 29–32.
- Rice, R.W., M.R. Frone et D.B. McFarlin. 1992. « Work-Nonwork Conflict and the Perceived quaLity of Life ». Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 13, 155–168.
- Rizzo, J. R., R.J. House et S.I. Lirtzman. 1970. « Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organisations ». Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 15, no 2, 150–163.
- Spanier, G.B. 1976. « Measuring Dyadic Adjustment : New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads ». Journal of Marriage and the Family, vol. 38, 15–28.
- Stephens, G.K. et S.M. Sommer. 1996. « The Measurement of Work to Family Conflict ». Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 56, 475–486.
- St-Onge, S., G. Guérin, R. Trottier, V. Haines et M. Simard. 1994. « L’équilibre travail-famille : un nouveau défi pour les organisations ». Gestion, revue internationale de gestion, vol. 19, no 2, 64–73.
- St-Onge, S. et G. Guérin. 1997. « Le conflit emploi-famille : validation du modèle causes-conséquences ». GRH face à la crise : GRH en crise. M. Tremblay et B. Sire, dir. Montréal : Les Presses HEC, 243–257.
- Suchet, M. et J. Barling. 1986. « Employed Mother : Interrole Conflict, Spouse Support and Marital Functioning ». Journal of Occupational Behavior, vol. 7, 167–178.
- Thomas, L.T. et D.C. Ganster. 1995. « Impact of Family-Supportive Work Variables on Work-Family Conflict and Strain : A Control Perspective ». Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 80, no 1, 6–15.
- Vinokur, A.D., P.F. Pierce et C.L. Buck. 1999. « Work-Family Conflicts of Women in the Air Force : Their Influence on Mental Health and Functioning ». Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 20, 865–878.
- Voydanoff, P. 1988. « Work Role Characteristics, Family Structure Demands, and Work/Family Conflict ». Journal of Marriage and the Family, vol. 50, 749–761.
- Weiss, H.M. et S. Adler. 1984. « Personality and Organizational Behavior ». Research in Organizational Behavior. L.L. Cummings and M. Staw, dir. Greenwich, CT : JAI Press, vol. 6, 1–50.
- Wheaton, B., B. Muthen, D.F. Alwin et G.F. Summers. 1977. « Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models ». Sociological Methodology, San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 84–136.
- Wiley, D.L. 1987. « The Relationship Between Work/Nonwork Role Conflict and Job-Related Outcomes : Some Unanticipated Findings ». Journal of Management, vol. 13, no 3, 467–472.
- Williams, K.J et G.M. Alliger. 1994. « Role Stressors, Mood Spillover, and Perceptions of Work-Family Conflict in Employed Parents ». Academy of Management Journal, vol. 37, 837–868.
- Yang, N., C.C. Chen, J. Choi et Y. Zou. 2000. « Sources of Work-Family Conflict : A Sino-U.S. Comparison of the Effects of Work and Family Demands ». Academy of Management Journal, vol. 43, no 1, 113–123.
- Zedeck, S. 1992. Work, Family and Organization. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.