Documents found

  1. 301.

    Article published in Relations (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Issue 770, 2014

    Digital publication year: 2014

  2. 303.

    Article published in Relations industrielles (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 24, Issue 1, 1969

    Digital publication year: 2005

  3. 304.

    Article published in Nouvelles pratiques sociales (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 4, Issue 1, 1991

    Digital publication year: 2008

  4. 305.

    Jacques, Daniel D.

    Le royaume de la confusion

    Article published in L'Inconvénient (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Issue 72, 2018

    Digital publication year: 2018

  5. 310.

    Article published in Philosophiques (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 48, Issue 1, 2021

    Digital publication year: 2021

    More information

    Continuing from their joint work in the 1980s, Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe both started developing a new theory of populism in the early 2000s. This paper defines it as a double ontology of politics, which includes both enmity — the dissociative dimension of the political-and deliberation — the associative dimension. In order to distinguish their approach from right-wing populism, Laclau and Mouffe resort to uncompromising anti-essentialism which casts history out of the construction of the political subject. Doing so, they assimilate consistent anti-colonial and anti-racist movements to conservatism and reaction. These confusions originate in insufficient problematization of the racial question and anti-racism activism, that the authors often invoke but never analyze properly. These shortcomings require a reformulation of left-wing populism of which the question of pluralism could provide the starting point.