Documents found

  1. 1.

    Article published in Entre les lignes (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Volume 5, Issue 3, 2009

    Digital publication year: 2010

  2. 2.

    Brazeau, Jacques

    Commentaire

    Article published in Recherches sociographiques (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 3, Issue 1-2, 1962

    Digital publication year: 2005

  3. 4.

    Veillette, Sylviane and Merri, Maryvonne

    À la recherche du monde vécu

    Article published in Phronesis (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 9, Issue 3-4, 2020

    Digital publication year: 2020

    More information

    This article provides a critical view of the didactic transposition of the dominant approach to psychology, which is now extended to the psychology of education. First, we present the scientific principles used in psychology training. These principles concern the notion of participant, privileged research objects and the activity of the researcher. Following Habermas (1987), we demonstrate that this psychology participates in a “colonization of the lifeworld” and in its historico-cultural narrowing. Finally, we propose an epistemological and methodological alternative allowing a re-reading of these three principles in a historico-cultural perspective.

    Keywords: Contrôle, Corpus préexistants, Exhaustivité, Préoccupations, Control, Corpus, Exhaustivity, Preoccupation, Pre-existing

  4. 6.

    Thesis submitted to Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

    2010

  5. 7.

    Thesis submitted to Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

    1993

  6. 8.

    Thesis submitted to Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

    1992

  7. 9.

    Thesis submitted to Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

    1985

  8. 10.

    Article published in Philosophiques (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 36, Issue 2, 2009

    Digital publication year: 2010

    More information

    AbstractThe aim of this essay is to identify and to analyze some key aspects of Husserl's critique of Natorp's psychology in the fifth Logical Investigation. After dividing Husserl's argumentation into four main objections, we show that what is at stake in all of them is the idea of an empirical psychology in Brentano's style. From that perspective we comment two of the most significant questions raised by the Husserl-Natorp debate : the nature of the difference between psychical and physical, the possibility of objectifying phenomenal contents. We then attempt to clarify in what sense Husserl's and Natorp's answers to these two questions are diametrically opposed. We conclude by some remarks on the intrinsic weaknesses of Natorp's approach.