Cinémas is a specialty journal primarily concerned with cinematographic studies and theoretical or analytical projects that embrace different approaches, methods and disciplines (aesthetics, semiotics, history, communications, human sciences, art history, etc.) likely to stimulate reflection. Particular attention is given to research into the changes underway with regard both to creative practices and theoretical discourse.
Cinemas is an independent journal run by a non-profit organization.
It receives support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Fonds de recherche du Québec - Société et culture, as well as support from the University of Montreal (Department of Art History and Cinematographic Studies, Faculty of Arts and Sciences).
It is a member of the Canadian Association of Learned Journals.
It is a signatory of the Joint Declaration of Principles of the Coalition for Diversity and Inclusion in Scholarly Communications.
Université de Montréal, Pavillon Lionel-Groulx
Case postale 6128, succursale Centre-ville
Montréal (Québec) H3C 3J7
Université de Montréal, Pavillon Lionel-Groulx
3150 rue Jean-Brillant, 2e étage, local c-2168
Montréal (Québec) H3T 1N9
Cinémas is an open-access journal.
Back issues (63 issues)
Permanent archiving of articles on Érudit is provided by Portico.
Editorial policy and ethics
Cinémas publishes three issues a year. Each issue usually comprises a thematic dossier, placed under the responsibility of a researcher, and a "Miscellaneous" section.
Cinémas is indexed in the following databases: Scopus, EBSCOhost, Érudit, FIAF International Index to Film Periodicals, Isidore, Google Scholar, MLA International Bibliography, Persée, Proquest and SDM Repère.
In accordance with the Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications and the Politique de diffusion en libre accès des Fonds de recherche du Québec, any article published by Cinémas is available online without restriction upon publication.
Graduate students and postdoctoral fellows may submit an article to the journal. Articles of students or postdoctoral fellows are evaluated according to the same criteria and receive the same treatment as articles from established researchers. The status of the author is not revealed to the evaluators and is not taken into account at any point in the editorial process.
Any article published by the journal was selected at the end of the process described below, whose guiding principles are independence, impartiality, transparency and confidentiality.
1. Validation of the manuscript
The manuscript is first reviewed by the editorial team to check if it meets the standards of the article submission protocol. The manuscript is then subject to an initial assessment by the Editor in Chief, who determines whether the article meets the basic scientific criteria of the journal.
2. Peer review
An anonymous version of the manuscript is evaluated by a minimum of 2 researchers selected expressly by the Editor in Chief according to their competence and their specialization.
Each evaluator must complete an evaluation form, which contains specific questions to guide their thinking and analysis. The evaluator is thus invited to consider the relevance of the article for the journal (and for the thematic dossier, if applicable), to evaluate the scientific qualities and the originality of the text, to judge the quality of writing and style, to suggest possible modifications or corrections and, finally, to make their final recommendation. The evaluator can also annotate the manuscript.
A minimum period of 3 weeks is granted to the evaluator to allow them to make a careful reading, to conduct the necessary research to verify the arguments defended and to issue a well-considered opinion. A minimum of 2 favorable opinions is required for the article to be selected for publication.
The article can be accepted without modification, accepted subject to (minor or major) modifications or refused. The decision is up to the Editor in Chief, who informs the author by sending them an evaluation report where the comments of the evaluators are transcribed in full (preserving their anonymity).
3. Editorial verification
The author whose article is accepted has a period of between 30 and 90 days to revise their manuscript with regard to the evaluation report.
The second version of the article is evaluated by a member of the Editorial Board, who can accept it as is or request additional modifications—in which case the third version of the manuscript is evaluated by the Editor in Chief, who determines if the changes made are satisfactory.
The manuscript then enters the editorial chain.
Any reference to earlier publications should be clearly identified.
Plagiarism is the total or partial use, literal or disguised, of an idea, a statement, a text, or any element, whether published or not, by passing it for one's own or omitting to provide the exact source according to the standards of scholarly publishing. Cinemas categorically rejects any plagiarism and do not differentiate cases according to their severity or magnitude; any obvious case of plagiarism entails the same measures.
Plagiarism noted prior to publication results in immediate rejection of the article and automatic rejection of any subsequent submission by the author.
If plagiarism is found after the publication of the article, the journal will issue a statement and will make sure to limit the impact of this plagiarism, including by clearly identifying the offending text.
In all cases, the journal will report the situation to the home institution of the author, to the agencies funding its research, if any, as well as to the persons it considers to be directly concerned (for example, the author's academic advisor or the plagiarized author).
One exception is provided: in the case of inadvertent self-plagiarism discovered before publication, and only in this case, the author will first have the opportunity to make the necessary corrections and changes so that his text conforms to the policies of the journal. Changes will be evaluated by the Editor in Chief, who will determine if they are satisfactory.
Information for contributors
The manuscript must be, in its totality, original and unpublished, in any medium and in any language.
The author must sign a publishing agreement. This document "seeks a balance between the rights and obligations of the parties, in the context of the uses of publishing and the laws of Quebec, for the wide dissemination of the text by all available technological means." The author remains the copyright owner of the article, but agrees to grant the publisher all the rights required to operate the journal according to current and future uses. For this purpose, the author grants to the publisher a non exclusive license which authorizes, in the language of the article, throughout the world and for the duration of the rights on the journal to reproduce the article by all processes and in all formats.
To submit an article for the "Miscellaneous" section, please contact the team by email at email@example.com.
Your message must include your name, affiliation and postal address, as well as your manuscript (DOCX format) and, if applicable, your illustrations (JPEG or TIFF formats).
To submit an article for a thematic dossier, please contact the researcher responsible for that dossier.
Your manuscript must be a maximum of 50 000 characters, with spaces, including the endnotes and the bibliography.
It must be accompanied by an abstract of approximately 1 000 characters.
Your manuscript must include an accurate and complete bibliography. References must be presented in Chicago Author-Date style.
Images must have a minimum resolution of 300 dots per inch (DPI). Each image must be transmitted separately.
If an image does not belong to the public domain, it is incumbent on the author to identify the rights holders and to obtain their agreement for its reproduction. The rights holders must sign a license agreement. Reproduction rights, if any, must be paid by the author. The journal team accompanies the author in this process.
The author must indicate, by the mention "Fig. X " followed by the caption, where each of the illustrations should appear in the article. The caption must describe the image, specify the source and mention the rights holders, should they require so.
To propose a dossier
To propose a thematic dossier for which you want to have the editorial responsibility, please contact the team by email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Your message must include your name, affiliation, and the elements described below, in a single file in DOCX format.
The Editorial Committee of the journal evaluates the thematic dossier proposals. The Editor in Chief sends a detailed notice of acceptance or refusal to the proposer. If the thematic dossier proposal is accepted, the Managing Editor contacts the proposer to plan the rest of the editorial process.
The proposer must clearly present in 2 000 words the chosen theme, emphasizing the relevance of the subject in relation to the development of knowledge in film studies. The proposal must have a provisional title.
The proposer must submit 7 article projects of 500 words, written by the prospective collaborators. The Editorial Committee reserves the right to request the addition or removal of one or more article project. The publication of each article is conditional upon the author's signature of the publishing agreement and its acceptance at the end of the evaluation process.
The proposer may be the author or co-author of one of the article projects. There must be at least 1 graduate student or postdoctoral fellow among the prospective collaborators. At least 2 article projects must be in English. Equitable representation of the genders and minorities is strongly encouraged.
For each article project, the proposer must provide a 150-word notice specifying the professional title, affiliation and research interests of its author.
Editor in Chief
Richard Bégin (Université de Montréal)
Marta Boni (Université de Montréal)
Viva Paci (Université du Québec à Montréal)
Aboubakar Sanogo (Carleton University)
Emmanuelle André (Université Paris 7, France)
Vincent Bouchard (Indiana University, États-Unis)
Laurent Guido (Université de Lille, France)
Todd McGowan (University of Vermont, États-Unis)
Dominique Nasta (Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgique)
Beate Oschner (Universität Konstänz, Allemagne)
Heui-Tae Park (Sungkyunkwan University, Corée du Sud)
Leonardo Quaresima (Università di Udine, Italie)
Maxime Scheinfeigel (Université Montpellier 3, France)
Adolfo Vera (Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile)